Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

We have entered the 'After Babel' stage of existence

Opinion

Jonathan Haidt

On Wednesday, Feb. 28, at 3 pm ET (12 pm PT), Citizen Connect will stream “After Babel: The Fragmentation of Everything,” with special guest Dr. Jonathan Haidt. The program is presented in partnership with Florida Humanities, the National Endowment for the Humanities and The Village Square, an organization with a mission to build civic trust between people who don’t look or think alike in American hometowns.


Learn more about the program and register here.

Program description: What if, at a pinnacle of our civilization’s technological achievement, everything just broke — the institutions we’ve come to rely upon in navigating a modern complex world, the shared stories that hold a large and diverse democratic republic together, and even a common language through which to navigate the rising tide of crisis. According to renowned social psychologist and author Jonathan Haidt, this describes our current reality, one that he calls “After Babel.” In this new normal, we are scattered by a digital environment into feuding tribes that are governed by mob dynamics and driven by a minority of ideological outliers, made stupid at warp speed by group think, and — thanks to social media — armed with billions of metaphorical “dart guns” with which to immediately wound “the enemy” in ways that are hardly only metaphorical. What could go wrong?

About Dr. Haidt: Jonathan Haidt is a social psychologist and professor of ethical leadership at New York University’s Stern School of Business. He’s the author of four books, two of which became New York Times best sellers, including “The Happiness Hypothesis,” “The Coddling of the American Mind” and “The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion” — and the forthcoming “The Anxious Generation.” He’s been named a top 100 global thinker by Foreign Policy magazine and one of the world’s 65 best thinkers of the year by Prospect magazine. His four TED Talks have been viewed more than 7 million times.


Read More

Meeting, handshake and business people with deal in office for funding approval and success.

Four Reds and four Blues reached unanimous Points of Agreement on immigration, then presented them to Reps. Fitzpatrick and Suozzi. Here’s how it worked.

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images

On Immigration, Common Ground May Be Closer Than We Think

Immigration has become one of the issues pulling Americans apart. Earlier this month, at a constituent conversation in Bristol, Pennsylvania, I watched eight Americans with very different political views offer a glimpse of how it does not have to stay that way.

Four “Reds” and four “Blues” — terms used for participants on the political right and left — sat across from Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) and Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), the Republican and Democratic co-chairs of the House Problem Solvers Caucus, to present something increasingly unusual in our politics: unanimous Points of Agreement on immigration developed through an earlier Common Ground Workshop.

Keep ReadingShow less
Visitor at the reflecting pools to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center

A visitor pauses at the reflecting pools to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center at the National 9/11 Memorial & Museum on September 11, 2026, in New York City.

(Photo by Jeenah Moon - Pool/Getty Images)

The Moral Distance Between Our Dead and Theirs

Last month, I watched the ceremonies marking the 25th anniversary of September 11.

I listened as family members read the names of the dead. Children and grandchildren talked about people whose absence still shapes their lives. Nearly 3,000 people were killed that morning. At the 9/11 Memorial, they are remembered as individuals.

Keep ReadingShow less
​A sign directs pedestrians towards the United States in Tijuana, Mexico. A person walks in the foreground.

A sign directs pedestrians towards the United States on January 16, 2019 in Tijuana, Mexico.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Immigration, Borders, and Belonging: Toward a More Honest Conversation

This week, Germany’s far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) won nearly 44 percent of the vote in Saxony-Anhalt, more than twice the Christian Democrats’ share and the AfD’s strongest state-election result. Anti-immigration sentiment and nationalism helped drive the campaign.

I first visited Germany in 1986 and have returned many times. Career-related assignments have repeatedly taken me to the Netherlands and Austria as well. Through four decades of travel and conversations with ordinary Europeans, I have noticed a marked change since 2016. Over the past decade, concerns about immigration have surfaced more frequently, not only in Germany but across Europe.

Keep ReadingShow less