Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

New research finds Arizona GOP rejected Trump and MAGA candidates

Kari Lake on stage

Republican Kari Lake lost her bid for governor of Arizona in 2022 because a significant number of "crossover" voters cast ballots for her Democratic opponent.

Gina Ferazzi/Getty Images

Rosenfeld is the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

In 2020’s presidential election, Fox News called Arizona early for Joe Biden – enraging Donald Trump and his supporters, who quickly claimed the election was stolen. In 2022, Kari Lake, the Trump loyalist running for governor, issued similar cries when the vote count revealed that she had lost her race to Democrat Katie Hobbs, then secretary of state.

Not everyone jumped to conspiratorial conclusions. A trio of retired election technologists and analysts with years of experience parsing every ballot for voting patterns was first to issue a factual explanation of what had happened. In 2020, the researchers – a Democrat, Republican and independent – found that tens of thousands of voters in greater Phoenix and Tucson voted for most of the Republicans on their ballots, but not for Trump.


The analysts have since updated their research with Arizona’s 2022’s results and 2024’s closed presidential primaries. Their findings, which are not a poll or estimate but are based on parsing every vote cast on every ballot, found that growing numbers of Republicans are rejecting conspiracy-minded candidates. Moreover, these otherwise loyal Republicans voted for Democrats in numbers that led to Democratic victories in those contests.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

“The result indicates growing disenchantment and a significant uptick in voter disgust manifested by a surge in cross-party voting,” wrote Larry Moore, lead author and the retired founder and CEO of Clear Ballot, a federally certified firm specializing in auditing every vote cast. “The findings suggest a challenging landscape for MAGA-aligned candidates in 2024.”

With scores of 2024 federal and statewide candidates who still claim that Trump did not lose in 2020, their Arizona analysis – in a key battleground state with outsized influence – suggests that the public is tiring of stolen election conspiracies. Moreover, it points to a split-ticket voting pattern that may anticipate that will unfold this fall – as Trump and many GOP candidates continue to attack elections and Trump faces other legal jeopardy.

The researchers, who call themselves “The Audit Guys,” also included Tim Halvorsen, Clear Ballot’s former chief technology officer, and Benny White, a retired pilot, lawyer, and longtime election analyst for the Arizona Republican Party. Their latest work was vetted by academics who have studied election technologies and are familiar with the data used.

The team analyzed a massive spreadsheet (or database) called the cast vote record that lists every choice and vote on every ballot. It is the only election record that reveals who voters did and did not vote for. For varying reasons, most political scientists, pollsters, media, and political parties do not conduct or publish similar voting-pattern analyses.

After 2020’s presidential election, the trio was first to document that otherwise loyal Arizona Republicans – those who voted for a majority of GOP candidates on their ballot – did not vote for Trump. That analysis focused on two counties where more than 70 percent of Arizona voters live. Their latest analysis revisited that research and found “disaffected” Republicans in 2020 and 2022 voted for the Democratic candidate over Trump or Trump loyalist candidates in sufficient numbers to affect the race’s outcome.

“The Republican base eroded from 2020 to 2022 as a growing number of voters cast their ballots for Republican candidates down-ballot but not for the top of the ticket,” their report said. “More troubling for Republicans, an increasing number of voters didn’t simply skip the top of the ticket or cast protest votes for write-ins or third-party candidates but voted Democratic while supporting Republican candidates for lower office.”

“These [cross-over] voters gave victories to Joe Biden over Donald Trump (0.31%), Mark Kelly over Blake Masters (5%), Katie Hobbs over Kari Lake (0.7%), Adrian Fontes over Mark Finchem (4.8%) and Kris Mayes over Abe Hamadeh (0.01%) in races for President, U.S. Senate, Governor, Secretary of State, and Attorney General,” it continued.

There was “a slight increase in the Disaffection index for GOP voters, from 6.2% [in 2020] to 7.1% [in 2022],” the report said. “Over the same time, the percentage of disaffected Arizona Republicans who cast ballots for Democrats (i.e., Disgust index) grew from 65% to 86%.”

While there was a similar pattern of disaffected Democrats in 2020 – those supporting Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential candidacy or voting for Trump – the size of that bloc of voters paled in comparison to “disaffected” and “disgusted” Republicans.

“In 2020, 3.6% of Joe Biden’s Arizona vote came from disgusted Republicans. In 2022, the top of the Democratic ticket got 5.6% of its votes from disgusted MAGA-supportive voters,” the researchers said. “In contrast, the percentage of the MAGA vote from disgusted Democratic-supportive voters declined from 2.2% in 2020 to 0.6% in 2022. This data confronts the “whataboutism” arguments [conspiracies and false claims] with facts.”

Looking at 2022’s governor’s race – where lawyers for Lake, who is now running for Senate, told a court in late March that she had “defamed” Phoenix’s top election official (a Republican) by lying about her loss – the researchers noted that “4.2% of Democrat Katie Hobbs’ support – 33,0412 votes – came from disgusted Republican-supportive voters. By comparison, Hobbs’ margin of victory was 17,117 [votes].”

These trends appear to be continuing in 2024’s closed presidential primaries, they said.

“In the Arizona primary on March 19, 2024, two weeks after Nikki Haley suspended her campaign, 21% of voters in Arizona did not vote for Trump—a measure of disaffection with the presumptive nominee,” the report said. “By contrast, Biden’s Index of Disaffection in Democratic closed primaries is 13% – higher than in 2022 – but there is little indication that voters disaffected with Biden will vote for Trump.”

These findings suggest that cross-party voting will continue in 2024’s presidential election as Trump – and scores of GOP candidates following his cues will be on the general election ballot. Moreover, many polls have found notable numbers of Republicans are reluctant to vote for Trump if he is convicted in any of the lawsuits and prosecutions he now faces.

Read More

silhouettes of people arguing in front of an America flag
Pict Rider/Getty Images

'One side will win': The danger of zero-sum framings

Elwood is the author of “Defusing American Anger” and hosts thepodcast “People Who Read People.”

Recently, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was surreptitiously recorded at a private event saying, about our political divides, that “one side or the other is going to win.” Many people saw this as evidence of his political bias. In The Washington Post, Perry Bacon Jr. wrote that he disagreed with Alito’s politics but that the justice was “right about the divisions in our nation today.” The subtitle of Bacon’s piece was: “America is in the middle of a nonmilitary civil war, and one side will win.”

It’s natural for people in conflict to see it in “us versus them” terms — as two opposing armies facing off against each other on the battlefield. That’s what conflict does to us: It makes us see things through war-colored glasses.

Keep ReadingShow less
David French

New York Times columnist David French was removed from the agenda of a faith-basd gathering because we was too "divisive."

Macmillan Publishers

Is canceling David French good for civic life?

Harwood is president and founder of The Harwood Institute. This is the latest entry in his series based on the "Enough. Time to Build.” campaign, which calls on community leaders and active citizens to step forward and build together.

On June 10-14, the Presbyterian Church in America held its annual denominational assembly in Richmond, Va. The PCA created considerable national buzz in the lead-up when it abruptly canceled a panel discussion featuring David French, the highly regarded author and New York Times columnist.

The panel carried the innocuous-sounding title, “How to Be Supportive of Your Pastor and Church Leaders in a Polarized Political Year.” The reason for canceling it? French, himself a long-time PCA member, was deemed too “divisive.” This despite being a well-known, self-identified “conservative” and PCA adherent. Ironically, the loudest and most divisive voices won the day.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young girl holding a sparkler and wearing an American flag shirt
Rebecca Nelson/Getty Images

Three approaches to Independence Day

Anderson edited "Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework," has taught at five universities and ran for the Democratic nomination for a Maryland congressional seat in 2016.

July Fourth is not like Christmas or Rosh Hashanah, holidays that create a unified sense of celebration among celebrants. On Christmas, Christians throughout the world celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ. On Rosh Hashanah, Jews throughout the world celebrate the Jewish New Year.

Yet on the Fourth of July, apart from the family gatherings, barbecues and drinking, we take different approaches. Some Americans celebrate the declaration of America's independence from Great Britain and especially the value of freedom. And some Americans reject the holiday, because they believe it highlights the self-contradiction of the United States, which created a nation in which some would be free and some would be enslaved. And other Americans are conflicted between these two points of view.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fireworks on July 4
Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

One country, one constitution, one destiny

Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."

“One country, one constitution, one destiny,” Daniel Webster said in a historic 1837 speech defending the American Union.

This of Fourth of July, 187 years after Webster’s speech and the 248th anniversary of the signing of our Declaration of Independence, Webster would no doubt be dismayed to find his quote reconstrued by popular opinion to read something like this:

“Divided country, debated constitution, and as for destiny, we’re going to hell in a hand-basket.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Rich Harwood
Harwood Institute

Meet the change leaders: Rich Harwood

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

After working on more than 20 political campaigns and two highly respected nonprofits, Rich Harwood set out to create something entirely different. He founded what is now known as The Harwood Institute for Public Innovation in 1988, when he was just 27 years old (and is now its president). Soon after, he wrote the ground-breaking report “Citizen and Politics: A View from Main Street,” the first national study to uncover that Americans did not feel apathetic about politics, but instead held a deep sense of anger and disconnection.

Over the past 30 years, Rich has innovated and developed a new philosophy and practice for how communities can solve shared problems, create a culture of shared responsibility and deepen people’s civic faith. The Harwood practice of Turning Outward has spread to all 50 states and is being used in 40 countries.

Keep ReadingShow less