Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Cross-partisan study labels ongoing election audits an 'existential threat'

Arizona election review

Pro-Trump organizers recount the ballots in Maricopa County, Ariz.

Courtney Pedroza/Getty Images

The continuing efforts to subvert the 2020 election results on behalf of former President Donald Trump, despite no evidence of widespread voter fraud, are damaging to democracy and costly to taxpayers, a new report found.

The so-called audits being organized by pro-Trump conspiracy theorists in several battleground states have "severe deficiencies in basic security, accuracy, reliability and transparency," according to a 30-page report, released Thursday.

Rather than being a partisan attempt to attack the audits, this report is the result of a cross-partisan collaboration between the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice, center-right R Street Institute and nonpartisan Protect Democracy, an anti-authoritarian watchdog.


The ongoing partisan election review in Maricopa, Arizona's most populous county, follows on the heels of a hand-recount of all ballots cast there and multiple investigations of the voting machines — none of which found any signs of fraud.

While the Arizona audit has received national attention, it's not an isolated incident. Similar efforts are also being conducted in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Researchers at the Brennan Center, Protect Democracy and R Street found that these partisan reviews fail to meet all or some of the following basic standards of objectivity.

  • Transparency: public audit plans, processes and records.
  • Objectivity: auditors who are, and appear to be, independent and free of conflicts of interest.
  • Pre-written, comprehensive procedures: standardized and consistently implemented processes designed to achieve accuracy.
  • Competence: conducted by election administration experts.
  • Security: ballots and equipment remain in election official control.

"The five so-called 'audits' are dressed up as fact-finding missions, but they are meant to create evidence that doesn't exist — fake proof of the myth that the 2020 election was somehow wrongly decided and false validation for the restrictions on the vote now sweeping the country," said Gowri Ramachandran, counsel in the Brennan Center's Election Reform Program and one of the authors of the report.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

These partisan efforts "stand in stark contrast," the report states, to the formal audits that election officials in the five states have already conducted, which confirmed Joe Biden's presidential victory and found no evidence of voter malfeasance.

"Despite these facts, Trump supporters continue to make false claims of fraud in support of these endeavors to transfer federal election materials to inexperienced, political actors for review," the report states.

Matthew Germer, a fellow in the Governance Program at the R Street Institute and one of the authors, said the findings highlight the need for election audits to be conducted by "trustworthy, nonpartisan professionals." The report also "lays out in stark relief just how unreliable and dangerous the partisan 'audits' sweeping the country really are," he said.

These partisan election reviews are also coming at a high cost for taxpayers, literally. The Arizona audit alone has racked up $2.4 million in expenses so far, mostly due to the fact that Maricopa County will need to replace all of its voting machines that have been compromised by this interference.

Wisconsin's review is estimated to cost more than $63,000, Pennsylvania's is estimated at $25,000 and Michigan's is estimated at just over $5,000. The cost of Georgia's review is not yet clear.

"While these so-called audits cost taxpayers money, their real cost is the damage they do to the health of our democracy," said Sara Chimene-Weiss, counsel at Protect Democracy and one of the authors. "These so-called 'audits' are not legitimate reviews, but instead are taxpayer-funded disinformation campaigns aimed at weakening Americans' faith in democracy."

The bottom line, per the report, is that these partisan efforts pose "an existential threat to our democracy."

"If every election continues to be litigated and relitigated without end, even where there is no evidence of fraud and multiple audits have confirmed the results, there is a serious threat voters will lose faith in our democratic process and will refuse to accept results they do not like," the report concludes.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less