Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Equipping faith leaders for the contentious 2024 election season

Bible on an American flag
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

Lawler is director of the Walker Leadership Institute at Eden Seminary. Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" (Abingdon Press, 2017) and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

The 2024 election season is underway, and the potential for increased polarization within our communities comes with it. As religious leaders, we hold a unique position of influence and trust. Our congregations and communities often look to us for guidance during times of uncertainty and conflict. However, the rapidly changing social and political landscape can leave even the most seasoned leaders unprepared.

That is why the Bridge Alliance, in collaboration with the Walker Leadership Institute at Eden Seminary, co-created the Praxis Cohort. This groundbreaking initiative supports and trains religious leaders in preparation for the challenging 2024 election season. The cohort recently held its inaugural virtual convening, drawing faith practitioners and others nationwide into a collaborative and educational forum.


Our vision is to create a network of faith leaders equipped with the knowledge, skills and spiritual grounding necessary to navigate the complexities of the modern political climate. Through this program, participants engage with theology, political science, conflict resolution and community organizing experts. The goal is not to dictate a political stance but to foster an environment where leaders can thoughtfully engage with contentious issues and guide their communities with compassion and wisdom.

The Jan. 27 convening of the cohort was a testament to the hunger for such learning and community. Faith practitioners from various denominations and backgrounds shared their experiences, concerns and hopes for the future. The event featured a series of workshops, keynotes, and discussions, all focusing on building resilience, fostering dialogue, contextualization, and understanding the intersection of faith and politics.

One of the highlights was the panel discussion on "A Spirituality to Sustain," where seasoned faith leaders shared their insights on maintaining faithfulness to spiritual precepts and practices amid differing political views within communities of faith. Another critical session was "Working in the Public Sphere," with the Rev. Ben Sander III, Denver’s chief equity officer, who shared theological imperatives and ethical considerations for faith-informed engagement in public space and discourse. The training provided was both practical and profound.

A vital training component emphasizes praxis – the intersection of theory and action. Therefore, participants are encouraged to implement what they learn within their communities through voter registration drives, hosting public forums, or simply fostering a more inclusive and understanding atmosphere within their congregations.

In the coming months, cohort participants will learn to harness the power of digital tools for community organizing, engage in role-playing exercises to prepare for difficult conversations, and develop strategies for self-care and spiritual resilience. The curriculum is dynamic and adapted to the needs of the cohort members and the unfolding political context.

The electoral season ahead is undoubtedly fraught with uncertainties, but the Praxis Cohort is an example of hope. Bridge Alliance and the Walker Leadership Institute believe investing in spiritual leaders is an investment towards healthy and more unified communities. As we expand the program and reach more faith leaders across the country, we are confident this will have a positive impact in the face of division and strife.

The 2024 election season may be contentious, but it also presents growth and transformation opportunities. Through the Praxis Cohort, we aim to empower faith leaders to be agents of peace and change, guiding their communities with a spirit of love and understanding that transcends political boundaries.

Interested faith leaders and social entrepreneurs desiring a cohort learning community are welcome to join Praxis. Together, with other diverse leaders committed to navigating the challenges ahead with courage and faith, you will not be alone in endeavoring to bring about a more just and representative democratic exercise this election season and beyond.

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Political outrage is rising—but dismissing the other side’s anger deepens division. Learn why taking outrage seriously can bridge America’s partisan divide.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Taking Outrage Seriously: Understanding the Moral Signals Behind Political Anger

Over the last several weeks, the Trump administration has deployed the National Guard to the nation’s capital to crack down on crime. While those on the right have long been aghast by rioting and disorder in our cities, pressing for greater military intervention to curtail it, progressive residents of D.C. have tirelessly protested the recent militarization of the city.

This recent flashpoint is a microcosm of the reciprocal outrage at the heart of contemporary American public life. From social media posts to street protests to everyday conversations about "the other side," we're witnessing unprecedented levels of political outrage. And as polarization has increased, we’ve stopped even considering the other political party’s concerns, responding instead with amusement and delight. Schadenfreude, or pleasure at someone else’s pain, is now more common than solidarity or empathy across party lines.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping.

Recent data shows that Americans view members of the opposing political party overly negatively, leading people to avoid political discourse with those who hold different views.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

How To Motivate Americans’ Conversations Across Politics

Introduction

A large body of research shows that Americans hold overly negative distortions of those across the political spectrum. These misperceptions—often referred to as "Perception Gaps"—make civil discourse harder, since few Americans are eager to engage with people they believe are ideologically extreme, interpersonally hostile, or even threatening or inferior. When potential disagreement feels deeply uncomfortable or dangerous, conversations are unlikely to begin.

Correcting these distortions can help reduce barriers to productive dialogue, making Americans more open to political conversations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less