Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Equipping faith leaders for the contentious 2024 election season

Opinion

Bible on an American flag
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

Lawler is director of the Walker Leadership Institute at Eden Seminary. Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" (Abingdon Press, 2017) and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

The 2024 election season is underway, and the potential for increased polarization within our communities comes with it. As religious leaders, we hold a unique position of influence and trust. Our congregations and communities often look to us for guidance during times of uncertainty and conflict. However, the rapidly changing social and political landscape can leave even the most seasoned leaders unprepared.

That is why the Bridge Alliance, in collaboration with the Walker Leadership Institute at Eden Seminary, co-created the Praxis Cohort. This groundbreaking initiative supports and trains religious leaders in preparation for the challenging 2024 election season. The cohort recently held its inaugural virtual convening, drawing faith practitioners and others nationwide into a collaborative and educational forum.


Our vision is to create a network of faith leaders equipped with the knowledge, skills and spiritual grounding necessary to navigate the complexities of the modern political climate. Through this program, participants engage with theology, political science, conflict resolution and community organizing experts. The goal is not to dictate a political stance but to foster an environment where leaders can thoughtfully engage with contentious issues and guide their communities with compassion and wisdom.

The Jan. 27 convening of the cohort was a testament to the hunger for such learning and community. Faith practitioners from various denominations and backgrounds shared their experiences, concerns and hopes for the future. The event featured a series of workshops, keynotes, and discussions, all focusing on building resilience, fostering dialogue, contextualization, and understanding the intersection of faith and politics.

One of the highlights was the panel discussion on "A Spirituality to Sustain," where seasoned faith leaders shared their insights on maintaining faithfulness to spiritual precepts and practices amid differing political views within communities of faith. Another critical session was "Working in the Public Sphere," with the Rev. Ben Sander III, Denver’s chief equity officer, who shared theological imperatives and ethical considerations for faith-informed engagement in public space and discourse. The training provided was both practical and profound.

A vital training component emphasizes praxis – the intersection of theory and action. Therefore, participants are encouraged to implement what they learn within their communities through voter registration drives, hosting public forums, or simply fostering a more inclusive and understanding atmosphere within their congregations.

In the coming months, cohort participants will learn to harness the power of digital tools for community organizing, engage in role-playing exercises to prepare for difficult conversations, and develop strategies for self-care and spiritual resilience. The curriculum is dynamic and adapted to the needs of the cohort members and the unfolding political context.

The electoral season ahead is undoubtedly fraught with uncertainties, but the Praxis Cohort is an example of hope. Bridge Alliance and the Walker Leadership Institute believe investing in spiritual leaders is an investment towards healthy and more unified communities. As we expand the program and reach more faith leaders across the country, we are confident this will have a positive impact in the face of division and strife.

The 2024 election season may be contentious, but it also presents growth and transformation opportunities. Through the Praxis Cohort, we aim to empower faith leaders to be agents of peace and change, guiding their communities with a spirit of love and understanding that transcends political boundaries.

Interested faith leaders and social entrepreneurs desiring a cohort learning community are welcome to join Praxis. Together, with other diverse leaders committed to navigating the challenges ahead with courage and faith, you will not be alone in endeavoring to bring about a more just and representative democratic exercise this election season and beyond.

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Democrats can reclaim America’s founding principles, rebuild the rural economy, and restore democracy by redefining the political battle Trump began.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Defining the Democrat v. Republican Battle

Winning elections is, in large part, a question of which Party is able to define the battle and define the actors. Trump has so far defined the battle and effectively defined Democrats for his supporters as the enemy of making America great again.

For Democrats to win the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections, they must take the offensive and show just the opposite–that it is they who are true to core American principles and they who will make America great again, while Trump is the Founders' nightmare come alive.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Trump and the MAGA movement have twisted the meaning of patriotism. It’s time we collectively reclaim America’s founding ideals and the Pledge’s promise.

Getty Images, LeoPatrizi

Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Republicans have always claimed to be the patriotic party, the party of "America, right or wrong," the party willing to use force to protect American national interests abroad, the party of a strong military. In response, Democrats have not really contested this perspective since Vietnam, basically ceding the patriotic badge to the Republicans.

But with the advent of Donald Trump, the Republican claim to patriotism has gotten broader and more troubling. Republicans now claim to be the party that is true to our founding principles. And it is not just the politicians; they have support from far-right scholars at the Heritage Foundation, such as Matthew Spalding. The Democratic Party has done nothing to counter these claims.

Keep ReadingShow less
Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

As political violence threatens democracy, defending free speech, limiting government overreach, and embracing pluralism matters is critical right now.

Getty Images, Javier Zayas Photography

The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

The assassinations of conservative leader Charlie Kirk and Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota have triggered endorsements of violence and even calls for literal war on both the far right and far left. Fortunately, an overwhelming majority of Americans reject political violence, but all of us are in a fight to keep our diverse and boisterous brand of democracy alive. Doing so requires a renewed commitment to pluralism and a clear-headed recognition of the limits of government, especially when proposals entail using the criminal justice system to punish speech.

Pluralism has been called the lifeblood of a democracy like ours, in which being an American is not defined by race or religion. It requires learning about and accepting our differences, and embracing the principle that, regardless of them, every person is entitled to be protected by our Constitution and have a voice in how we’re governed. In contrast, many perpetrators of political violence rationalize their acts by denying the basic humanity of those with whom they disagree. They are willing to face the death penalty or life in prison in an attempt to force everyone to conform to their views.

Keep ReadingShow less