Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Beyond Party Lines

Opinion

Beyond Party Lines
An illustration to symbolize two divided groups.
Getty Images / Andrii Yalanskyi

The American Experiment tested whether groups with diverse interests could unite under a declaration of common principles. In this moment, we face a critical juncture that tests whether distrust and political fervor could drive Americans to abandon or deny everything that unites us.

Henry Bolingbroke contends that party spirit inspires “Animosity and breeds Rancor.” Talking of his countrymen, he wrote, “We likewise derive, not our Privileges (for they were always ours) but a more full and explicit Declaration”; Whigs and Tories can unite on this alone. That Declaration of Ours was penned by Thomas Jefferson when his colonists repelled the redcoats at the Siege of Charleston and when Washington’s troops were awaiting battle in Manhattan. The American Declaration set out those principles, which united the diverse colonies. And the party system, as Bolingbroke said, brought animosity and weakened the Union. Critics disputed these claims. William Warburton attacked Bolingbroke as an evil-speaker with “dog-eloquence”—claimed his calls for party reform were an aristocratic conspiracy to cement the power of elites. An anonymous critic argued that the government is a union of unrelated people where laws supplant the natural bonds between families. Then, the government of the United States would not exist, or would not exist long.


The American Experiment unified the colonies with diverse interests under common principles—protecting the natural rights of all people. Today, our union stands divided. Americans view their “enemy” with disdain; politicians denounce their opposition as racists, groomers, baby killers, elitists, and un-American tyrants. It seems Americans may abandon those uniting principles, the foundation of our union, to “win” or destroy the indefensible other side.

Biden said in a 2022 speech, “Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.” While Trump has called Democrats un-American and treasonous. Both men launched fiery language at their opponents to garner support for their agendas and bids for reelection. Sadly, this is the precedent in modern politics, where politicians portray half the country as immoral, unpatriotic, and dangerous.

Republican and Democratic politicians have transparently acted against the Constitution and the founding principles. Trying to keep the former President off the ballot, Republicans voted to impeach Biden officials on fourteen occasions, silencing their opposition by banning books, unlawfully prosecuting hate speech, and attacking the Judiciary for upholding our laws and checking the power of the President. Furthermore, the two-party system has established an order protecting the power and influence of members of Congress: Winning their seats uncontested and serving for decades, unpunished for favoring the interests of lobbyists, and becoming lavishly wealthy from insider trading, unreported gifts, and corruption.

The sharp rise in political violence is another sign of failing democracies. According to Statista, less than 10 percent of Americans felt political violence was justifiable in 2017; three years later, 30 percent of Americans felt violence could be the means for meeting their political goals. FBI Director Christopher Wray gave a heartfelt testimony in 2022, saying, “I feel like every day I’m getting briefed on someone throwing a Molotov cocktail at someone for some issue. It’s crazy.”

On New Year's Day, a veteran broke through a police vehicle and rammed into a crowd, leaving thirteen people killed. This is among several acts that we remember: Paul Pelosi being assaulted and hit in the head with a hammer, the political assassination attempts on Trump, the massacre in Charlottesville, and the recent plot to abduct Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer for her COVID policies. Americans are promoting change through acts of brutality; they have lost faith in their leadership and feel their liberties are in jeopardy. They believe the other side is attempting to destroy democracy and take away their rights. People are concerned about the state of the Second and First Amendments, affordable healthcare, exposing children to the alleged LGBTQ agenda, depriving people of transgender healthcare, and restricting abortion access.

Our anonymous critic had one concern, which I hope will encourage those still listening to speak loudly, animate people blinded by politics, and talk to the unreceptive crowd. He concludes, on the fallen states, one ambitious, vengeful, or capricious man “is enough to arm all the rest, without any private Views of their own, to the worst and blackest Purposes.” The people who fight tyranny on party lines are waiting for this one man—such people are already being exploited to ignore what they would have previously found vile, such as breaking up families, insurrection, or Democratic Congressman Tom Suozzi suggesting violence against President Trump, saying, “This is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly.” Some voters are numb to insurrection and threatening violence against the President, deporting students, separating families, and prosecuting free speech. This seems a credible threat to political stability, which demonstrates the dangers of our partisan divide, not just to civility or the interests of voters, but the real threat of tyranny and oppression. Americans must remove themselves from one-sided media and inflammatory politics. They must make themselves impartial to partisan insults and simplistic narratives. They must strip our politicians of their stage and stature, judging the ideas—if any—behind their punchy words and wheedling speeches.

People have become flooded with fear-mongering and political attacks. Americans, the majority, are rejecting their personal feelings and blindly supporting their side, which has led to more political violence and breaches of our Constitution and founding principles. People who blindly follow their party and have few of their own are exploited by any politician who rises, seeking to uproot American democracy and take power.

Luke Harris is an op-ed author who writes about the US, UK, and international politics, policy, and culture. He has been published in outlets like the North American Anglican and the Conservative Woman.

Read More

Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

As political violence threatens democracy, defending free speech, limiting government overreach, and embracing pluralism matters is critical right now.

Getty Images, Javier Zayas Photography

The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

The assassinations of conservative leader Charlie Kirk and Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota have triggered endorsements of violence and even calls for literal war on both the far right and far left. Fortunately, an overwhelming majority of Americans reject political violence, but all of us are in a fight to keep our diverse and boisterous brand of democracy alive. Doing so requires a renewed commitment to pluralism and a clear-headed recognition of the limits of government, especially when proposals entail using the criminal justice system to punish speech.

Pluralism has been called the lifeblood of a democracy like ours, in which being an American is not defined by race or religion. It requires learning about and accepting our differences, and embracing the principle that, regardless of them, every person is entitled to be protected by our Constitution and have a voice in how we’re governed. In contrast, many perpetrators of political violence rationalize their acts by denying the basic humanity of those with whom they disagree. They are willing to face the death penalty or life in prison in an attempt to force everyone to conform to their views.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman sitting down and speaking with a group of people.

The SVL (Stories, Values, Listen) framework—which aims to bridge political divides with simple, memorable steps for productive cross-partisan conversations—is an easy-to-use tool for making an impact at scale.

Getty Images, Luis Alvarez

Make Talking Politics Easier and More Scalable: Be SVL (Stories, Values, Listen)

How can one have a productive conversation across the political spectrum?

We offer simple, memorable guidance: Be SVL (pronounced like “civil”). SVL stands for sharing Stories, relating to a conversation partner’s Values, and closely Listening.

Keep ReadingShow less
St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

People attend a mass and ceremony for a new mural dedicated to New York City’s immigrant communities and honoring the city’s first responders at St. Patrick’s Cathedral on September 21, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

In a bold fusion of sacred tradition and contemporary relevance, artist Adam Cvijanovic has unveiled a sweeping new mural at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City—one that reimagines the historic narthex as a vibrant ode to peace, migration, and spiritual continuity.

In an age of polarization and performative politics, it’s rare to find a work of art that speaks with both spiritual clarity and civic urgency. Yet that’s exactly what “What’s So Funny About Peace, Love and Understanding” accomplishes. The piece is more than a visual upgrade to a “dreary” entranceway—it’s a theological and cultural intervention, one that invites every visitor to confront the moral stakes of our immigration discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less