Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Crowd Surfing Through Revolution

Opinion

Crowd Surfing Through Revolution
silhouette photo of man jumped off on top of people inside party hall
Photo by Zach Lucero on Unsplash

Picture this: A person launches themselves into a crowd at a concert, and for a moment, everything hangs in the balance. Will they fall? Will they float? It all depends on countless hands moving in coordination, strangers united in a common purpose. Some push up while others stabilize, creating a dynamic, living system that defies gravity.

At this moment, we are all suspended between falling and flying, carried by a wave of global resistance that nobody controls but all can help shape. Think about what makes crowd surfing work. It's not just about the individual being carried – it's about the collective choreography happening beneath. With too much force in one direction, you fall. Not enough support in another, you crash. The magic happens in the balance.


Interestingly, in crowd surfing, a crowd isn't just supporting passive weight but responding to and directing movement. The hoisted subject must work with the crowd, read its energy, and trust collective wisdom. The same is true for present-day movements. Gone are the days of top-down leadership, with single charismatic figures directing the masses. Instead, we're seeing what scholars call "distributed leadership"—thousands of local organizers reading the moment, making real-time decisions, and trusting the movement's collective intelligence.

Consider what happened during the March Treasury Actions. When federal agents targeted movement leaders in DC, local organizers in 50 cities instantly adopted the strategy. The crowd didn't drop the movement – it redistributed the weight. Within hours, what was supposed to be a massive protest in the capital became 50 simultaneous actions, each locally led but globally connected.

Such a concept is the new physics of protest: distributed yet coordinated, fluid yet focused, responsive yet resolute. Yet, challenges do exist. Just as crowd surfing can go wrong, movements can falter. Sometimes, the energy dissipates, coordination fails, and fear overcomes trust. The question isn't whether these moments will come—they always do. The question is whether we've built systems resilient enough to recover.

Thus, the global or dispersed nature of resistance becomes crucial. When movements falter in one place, they surge in another. When tactics fail in one context, they're refined and redeployed in another. The wave keeps moving, learning, and adapting. Often, the powers-that-be only discern the surface chaos and perceive that these movements lack structure. They don't recognize that this apparent chaos is a higher form of order – the same kind of emergent coordination you see in flocks of birds or schools of fish: no central control but profound collective intelligence.

Understanding this new dynamic is crucial for faith leaders and community organizers. Our role isn't to control the wave—it's to help people trust it, to help communities read its patterns, and to help movements maintain their balance between passion and strategy, disruption and sustainability. Crowd surfing works because people believe it will work. The moment that trust disappears, gravity wins. The same holds true for movement work. Movements are sustained not just by strategy and resources, but through collective faith—confidence in one another, the possibility of change, and coordinated action.

As I write this, my phone alerts me to another spontaneous protest forming downtown. The pattern is familiar now: a call goes out, people show up, the crowd forms, and the movement surges. Some will say it's chaos. But look closer. There's wisdom in this wave, strategy in this surge, and power in this pattern.

We're all crowd surfing now, carried by a wave of global resistance bigger than any of us. The question isn't whether we'll fall or fly. We'll learn to move with the wave, trust the collective, and become part of something larger than ourselves. Because, in the end, that's what this moment demands—not just resistance but resonance, not just protest but participation in a global movement that's rewriting the rules of power itself. The wave is here, and the crowd is ready. The only question is: Are we prepared to trust its carrying capacity?

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.


Read More

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view of teenage boy walking with arm around friends

Why many young men feel politically and socially adrift, how changing gender roles affect masculinity, self-esteem, relationships, and the future of society.

Maskot / Getty Images

Lost Boys - What Is the Role of a Man in Today's Society?

A recent New York Times article stated that young males who provided an important swing vote for Trump in 2024 are discouraged by what Trump has done and not done while in office. But they are nevertheless not particularly inclined to vote Democratic because they don't see the Party as welcoming their view of masculinity and they don't know where they fit in this society.

These young men assume that because the Party supports equality for women in the workplace and because many young women no longer have marriage and having children at the top of their agenda, the Party would not be a welcoming home for them. They see themselves as striving for the masculinity of their fathers' or grandfathers' day, where the man was the breadwinner in the family and had respect and authority. Not the weaker half in relationships with women.

Keep ReadingShow less