Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Crowd Surfing Through Revolution

Opinion

Crowd Surfing Through Revolution
silhouette photo of man jumped off on top of people inside party hall
Photo by Zach Lucero on Unsplash

Picture this: A person launches themselves into a crowd at a concert, and for a moment, everything hangs in the balance. Will they fall? Will they float? It all depends on countless hands moving in coordination, strangers united in a common purpose. Some push up while others stabilize, creating a dynamic, living system that defies gravity.

At this moment, we are all suspended between falling and flying, carried by a wave of global resistance that nobody controls but all can help shape. Think about what makes crowd surfing work. It's not just about the individual being carried – it's about the collective choreography happening beneath. With too much force in one direction, you fall. Not enough support in another, you crash. The magic happens in the balance.


Interestingly, in crowd surfing, a crowd isn't just supporting passive weight but responding to and directing movement. The hoisted subject must work with the crowd, read its energy, and trust collective wisdom. The same is true for present-day movements. Gone are the days of top-down leadership, with single charismatic figures directing the masses. Instead, we're seeing what scholars call "distributed leadership"—thousands of local organizers reading the moment, making real-time decisions, and trusting the movement's collective intelligence.

Consider what happened during the March Treasury Actions. When federal agents targeted movement leaders in DC, local organizers in 50 cities instantly adopted the strategy. The crowd didn't drop the movement – it redistributed the weight. Within hours, what was supposed to be a massive protest in the capital became 50 simultaneous actions, each locally led but globally connected.

Such a concept is the new physics of protest: distributed yet coordinated, fluid yet focused, responsive yet resolute. Yet, challenges do exist. Just as crowd surfing can go wrong, movements can falter. Sometimes, the energy dissipates, coordination fails, and fear overcomes trust. The question isn't whether these moments will come—they always do. The question is whether we've built systems resilient enough to recover.

Thus, the global or dispersed nature of resistance becomes crucial. When movements falter in one place, they surge in another. When tactics fail in one context, they're refined and redeployed in another. The wave keeps moving, learning, and adapting. Often, the powers-that-be only discern the surface chaos and perceive that these movements lack structure. They don't recognize that this apparent chaos is a higher form of order – the same kind of emergent coordination you see in flocks of birds or schools of fish: no central control but profound collective intelligence.

Understanding this new dynamic is crucial for faith leaders and community organizers. Our role isn't to control the wave—it's to help people trust it, to help communities read its patterns, and to help movements maintain their balance between passion and strategy, disruption and sustainability. Crowd surfing works because people believe it will work. The moment that trust disappears, gravity wins. The same holds true for movement work. Movements are sustained not just by strategy and resources, but through collective faith—confidence in one another, the possibility of change, and coordinated action.

As I write this, my phone alerts me to another spontaneous protest forming downtown. The pattern is familiar now: a call goes out, people show up, the crowd forms, and the movement surges. Some will say it's chaos. But look closer. There's wisdom in this wave, strategy in this surge, and power in this pattern.

We're all crowd surfing now, carried by a wave of global resistance bigger than any of us. The question isn't whether we'll fall or fly. We'll learn to move with the wave, trust the collective, and become part of something larger than ourselves. Because, in the end, that's what this moment demands—not just resistance but resonance, not just protest but participation in a global movement that's rewriting the rules of power itself. The wave is here, and the crowd is ready. The only question is: Are we prepared to trust its carrying capacity?

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

As political violence threatens democracy, defending free speech, limiting government overreach, and embracing pluralism matters is critical right now.

Getty Images, Javier Zayas Photography

The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

The assassinations of conservative leader Charlie Kirk and Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota have triggered endorsements of violence and even calls for literal war on both the far right and far left. Fortunately, an overwhelming majority of Americans reject political violence, but all of us are in a fight to keep our diverse and boisterous brand of democracy alive. Doing so requires a renewed commitment to pluralism and a clear-headed recognition of the limits of government, especially when proposals entail using the criminal justice system to punish speech.

Pluralism has been called the lifeblood of a democracy like ours, in which being an American is not defined by race or religion. It requires learning about and accepting our differences, and embracing the principle that, regardless of them, every person is entitled to be protected by our Constitution and have a voice in how we’re governed. In contrast, many perpetrators of political violence rationalize their acts by denying the basic humanity of those with whom they disagree. They are willing to face the death penalty or life in prison in an attempt to force everyone to conform to their views.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman sitting down and speaking with a group of people.

The SVL (Stories, Values, Listen) framework—which aims to bridge political divides with simple, memorable steps for productive cross-partisan conversations—is an easy-to-use tool for making an impact at scale.

Getty Images, Luis Alvarez

Make Talking Politics Easier and More Scalable: Be SVL (Stories, Values, Listen)

How can one have a productive conversation across the political spectrum?

We offer simple, memorable guidance: Be SVL (pronounced like “civil”). SVL stands for sharing Stories, relating to a conversation partner’s Values, and closely Listening.

Keep ReadingShow less
St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

People attend a mass and ceremony for a new mural dedicated to New York City’s immigrant communities and honoring the city’s first responders at St. Patrick’s Cathedral on September 21, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

In a bold fusion of sacred tradition and contemporary relevance, artist Adam Cvijanovic has unveiled a sweeping new mural at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City—one that reimagines the historic narthex as a vibrant ode to peace, migration, and spiritual continuity.

In an age of polarization and performative politics, it’s rare to find a work of art that speaks with both spiritual clarity and civic urgency. Yet that’s exactly what “What’s So Funny About Peace, Love and Understanding” accomplishes. The piece is more than a visual upgrade to a “dreary” entranceway—it’s a theological and cultural intervention, one that invites every visitor to confront the moral stakes of our immigration discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less