Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Crowd Surfing Through Revolution

Crowd Surfing Through Revolution
silhouette photo of man jumped off on top of people inside party hall
Photo by Zach Lucero on Unsplash

Picture this: A person launches themselves into a crowd at a concert, and for a moment, everything hangs in the balance. Will they fall? Will they float? It all depends on countless hands moving in coordination, strangers united in a common purpose. Some push up while others stabilize, creating a dynamic, living system that defies gravity.

At this moment, we are all suspended between falling and flying, carried by a wave of global resistance that nobody controls but all can help shape. Think about what makes crowd surfing work. It's not just about the individual being carried – it's about the collective choreography happening beneath. With too much force in one direction, you fall. Not enough support in another, you crash. The magic happens in the balance.


Interestingly, in crowd surfing, a crowd isn't just supporting passive weight but responding to and directing movement. The hoisted subject must work with the crowd, read its energy, and trust collective wisdom. The same is true for present-day movements. Gone are the days of top-down leadership, with single charismatic figures directing the masses. Instead, we're seeing what scholars call "distributed leadership"—thousands of local organizers reading the moment, making real-time decisions, and trusting the movement's collective intelligence.

Consider what happened during the March Treasury Actions. When federal agents targeted movement leaders in DC, local organizers in 50 cities instantly adopted the strategy. The crowd didn't drop the movement – it redistributed the weight. Within hours, what was supposed to be a massive protest in the capital became 50 simultaneous actions, each locally led but globally connected.

Such a concept is the new physics of protest: distributed yet coordinated, fluid yet focused, responsive yet resolute. Yet, challenges do exist. Just as crowd surfing can go wrong, movements can falter. Sometimes, the energy dissipates, coordination fails, and fear overcomes trust. The question isn't whether these moments will come—they always do. The question is whether we've built systems resilient enough to recover.

Thus, the global or dispersed nature of resistance becomes crucial. When movements falter in one place, they surge in another. When tactics fail in one context, they're refined and redeployed in another. The wave keeps moving, learning, and adapting. Often, the powers-that-be only discern the surface chaos and perceive that these movements lack structure. They don't recognize that this apparent chaos is a higher form of order – the same kind of emergent coordination you see in flocks of birds or schools of fish: no central control but profound collective intelligence.

Understanding this new dynamic is crucial for faith leaders and community organizers. Our role isn't to control the wave—it's to help people trust it, to help communities read its patterns, and to help movements maintain their balance between passion and strategy, disruption and sustainability. Crowd surfing works because people believe it will work. The moment that trust disappears, gravity wins. The same holds true for movement work. Movements are sustained not just by strategy and resources, but through collective faith—confidence in one another, the possibility of change, and coordinated action.

As I write this, my phone alerts me to another spontaneous protest forming downtown. The pattern is familiar now: a call goes out, people show up, the crowd forms, and the movement surges. Some will say it's chaos. But look closer. There's wisdom in this wave, strategy in this surge, and power in this pattern.

We're all crowd surfing now, carried by a wave of global resistance bigger than any of us. The question isn't whether we'll fall or fly. We'll learn to move with the wave, trust the collective, and become part of something larger than ourselves. Because, in the end, that's what this moment demands—not just resistance but resonance, not just protest but participation in a global movement that's rewriting the rules of power itself. The wave is here, and the crowd is ready. The only question is: Are we prepared to trust its carrying capacity?

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Political outrage is rising—but dismissing the other side’s anger deepens division. Learn why taking outrage seriously can bridge America’s partisan divide.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Taking Outrage Seriously: Understanding the Moral Signals Behind Political Anger

Over the last several weeks, the Trump administration has deployed the National Guard to the nation’s capital to crack down on crime. While those on the right have long been aghast by rioting and disorder in our cities, pressing for greater military intervention to curtail it, progressive residents of D.C. have tirelessly protested the recent militarization of the city.

This recent flashpoint is a microcosm of the reciprocal outrage at the heart of contemporary American public life. From social media posts to street protests to everyday conversations about "the other side," we're witnessing unprecedented levels of political outrage. And as polarization has increased, we’ve stopped even considering the other political party’s concerns, responding instead with amusement and delight. Schadenfreude, or pleasure at someone else’s pain, is now more common than solidarity or empathy across party lines.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping.

Recent data shows that Americans view members of the opposing political party overly negatively, leading people to avoid political discourse with those who hold different views.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

How To Motivate Americans’ Conversations Across Politics

Introduction

A large body of research shows that Americans hold overly negative distortions of those across the political spectrum. These misperceptions—often referred to as "Perception Gaps"—make civil discourse harder, since few Americans are eager to engage with people they believe are ideologically extreme, interpersonally hostile, or even threatening or inferior. When potential disagreement feels deeply uncomfortable or dangerous, conversations are unlikely to begin.

Correcting these distortions can help reduce barriers to productive dialogue, making Americans more open to political conversations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less