Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Redefining America's political lingua franca

Hand waving an American flag

"Freedom, a word that should inspire, has been distorted to justify the unchecked pursuit of individual interests at the expense of collective well-being," writes Johnson.

nicoletaionescu/Getty Images

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

A seismic shift has occurred in America's race, identity and power discourse. Like tectonic plates beneath the Earth's surface, long-held assumptions are adjusting and giving way to a reimagined lingua franca for civic engagement. This revived language of liberation redefines the terms of debate. It empowers us to reclaim and reinvigorate words once weaponized principally against marginalized communities.


At the forefront of this lexical revolution are concepts like patriotism, exceptionalism and freedom — terms long co-opted by those seeking to uphold a status quo rooted in inequality. Historically, patriotism has been wielded as a bludgeon against those demanding change, branded as "un-American" for daring to question the nation's shortcomings. Exceptionalism, the idea that America is inherently superior to other countries, has fueled hubris and hindered self-reflection. Freedom, a word that should inspire, has been distorted to justify the unchecked pursuit of individual interests at the expense of collective well-being.

Yet, a linguistic wave made of activists, influencers, former school teachers, politicos and their laity is reclaiming these words, imbuing them with the promised radical potential. You and me, we are not just bystanders but a catalytic current in this wave. Patriotism is being redefined as pursuing a more perfect union — a relentless critique of injustice, liberty and a steadfast demand for equity. Exceptionalism gives way to a global perspective recognizing America's flaws and seeking wisdom beyond its borders. Freedom is being reimagined as the collective liberation of all people.

This vision invites us all to be part of the change rather than the unfettered liberty of the privileged few.

Alongside this reclamation, new terms' meanings are emerging to capture the shifting zeitgeist. “Weird” has become a badge of honor and dishonor at the same time. In some contexts, weird rings positively for those embracing the beauty of difference in a society long dominated by homogenous norms. In other contexts, weird is the label of dishonor and shame denoting acts, attitudes or articulations that alienate or are very odd. “Declinist” describes pessimists who mourn a bygone era of unquestioned dominance rather than rolling up their sleeves to build a more equitable future. "Vibe" encapsulates the intangible yet undeniable sense of connectedness and shared purpose that fuels movements for change.

The lexical revolution unfolding before us is not merely an exercise in clever wordplay; it represents a fundamental resistance to narratives that have long justified inequality in our society. This linguistic phenomenon is an act of cultural insurgency, where people wrestle away the power to name their reality from systemic forces committed to preserving the existing social order.

Today's electorate attests that language can reflect and shape our worldview. It is about everyday citizens actively envisioning a world in which everyone has the power to define their place. It is a testament to the power of language as a force for change, and it holds the promise of a more inclusive and equitable future.

Furtherance of liberation language requires mindfulness of words' inherent power to inspire and arrest development. Liberationists of every stripe must continue to challenge, question and actively redefine the terms of our discourse, ever pushing toward a lingua franca that genuinely reflects the radical promise of equality and justice for all.

In reclaiming language, one reclaims one's power and inalienable right to be in the world anew.


Read More

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less