Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Gas prices up again? What’s going on?

Cash in a gas tak
tzahiV

Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America.

I pulled into a gas station near San Francisco, and my eyes popped out of my head: $6 a gallon!

Here we go again, the roller coaster of gas prices. And it’s not just in California. Since January, the national average price has increased 57 cents to $3.66 per gallon, almost a 20 percent increase.

Who or what causes gas prices at the pump to soar like this? Is it Saudi Arabia/OPEC, Russia, inflation, Middle East wars, price gouging by oil companies, paid-off politicians? Like everyone else, usually I just grumble and pay, but this time I got mad and went looking for answers.


First I asked the manager at the gas station. “It’s the price of oil, nothing I can do about it,” he said.

Some quick research verified that, indeed, the price of oil rose recently from $78 per barrel to $85. But that only accounted for about 17 cents of the increase.

So then I looked on the website of the Western States Petroleum Association, a pro-industry trade group. I also searched the website of the Department of Energy. Those two organizations don’t always agree, but both said that there is no single cause of changing gas prices, blaming it on several factors including:

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

  • The price of raw crude oil, which makes up half the cost at the pump. That price is determined by fluctuating global supply, but also by a global oil cartel, the Saudi-led Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, which sets oil production quotas for each country to restrict competition and keep the price artificially high.
  • The cost to refine crude oil into gasoline, including occasional refinery production shutdowns, scheduled and unscheduled.
  • Seasonal factors, such as changing from cheaper gas blends used in the winter, leading to a natural price spike in the spring.
  • Spot shortages, sometimes caused by geopolitical tensions. The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East have been significant factors, with crude oil prices now 34 percent higher than pre-Covid averages.
  • Local add-on taxes, which vary state to state.

Further complicating matters, pump prices don’t usually reflect market conditions that day or week, but reflect costs incurred weeks, even months before, making cause and effect harder to track.

Oh boy. It’s getting difficult to find the right group to blame. But the elephant in the room is whether the oil industry is price gouging consumers. Can we figure that out, at least?

The California Energy Commission found that when gasoline prices jumped to $5.70 per gallon in September 2023, the state’s oil refiners more than doubled their 66 cent margin from the previous January, the largest increase ever ... even though crude oil prices and other factors didn’t double. The state’s oil refiners ultimately made three times more than before.

Also, two anti-monopoly lawsuits have been filed recently, which present compelling evidence that the largest U.S. shale oil producers have conspired with OPEC to keep gas prices high.

To many energy experts, this gathering data strongly indicates that oil producers and refiners are gouging consumers. Oil companies hauled in $63 billion in just 90 days. Somehow the oil industry always finds its way to the pig trough.

That’s depressing. Is there nothing President Joe Biden and other elected politicians can do?

In October 2022, Biden mounted the bully pulpit, accusing the oil companies of profiteering during the Ukraine-Russia war. He singled out ExxonMobil, which reported a record $19.7 billion earnings in three months, saying “Exxon made more money than God.”

In addition to applying political pressure and issuing threats to tax the oil companies’ excessive profits, Biden tapped into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to release 180 million barrels of oil, the largest release in U.S. history.

Did it work? The price of gas fell from over five dollars to $3.76 per gallon, and naturally the Biden administration took credit. His opponents said prices would have declined anyway.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom passed a first-in-the-nation law to increase transparency through extensive monitoring of oil refiners for excessive profit-making, and authorizing price caps as well as penalties for price gouging. California has the nation’s highest average gas prices at $5.41 per gallon, almost $2 higher than the national average. It requires a cleaner, more expensive fuel blend that only certain refineries can deliver, sometimes leading to production shortages. Californians value having cleaner air, but they pay a premium price for it.

And so it goes. My conclusion? Gas prices come and go like the weather. Fortunately current prices are below last summer's prices, and well below the record high in 2022 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine drove the national average to over $5 per gallon. So that’s progress.

Yes, there is certainly price-gouging going on, because the magnitude and timing of the profit surge is too much of a coincidence to believe otherwise. But it’s hard to say how much, or to legally prove it.

And while refinery production shortages and winter/summer blending issues can drive up gas prices locally, nationwide price swings are almost always due to the OPEC-driven global prices for oil. It’s misleading to blame a president for large price spikes when that phenomenon is happening around the world.

So given all these complex factors, here’s my prediction for gas prices: It’s just like with the weather — highs tonight, lows tomorrow and precipitation is expected.

Read More

Young adults shopping for clothes

Members of Gen Z consume at an unsustainable rate: clothes, makeup, technology and every other imaginable product.

RyanJLane/Getty Images

Mass consumerism and the hypocrisy of Gen Z

Pruthi is a professor of entrepreneurship at San Jose State University, where she is a co-founder and director ofHonorsX, and a public voices fellow with The OpEd Project. Kharbanda is a senior at Presentation High School in San Jose, Calif.

California lawmakers recently approved two bills banning grocery and convenience stores statewide from offering customers reusable plastic bags. These bills are the next step in combating plastic waste, but what about the waste from mass consumerism that has come to pervade our lives?

Through the past decades, we have been trained to shop, purchase and consume products to solve our problems. While mending old clothing or refurbishing used goods have become things of the past, new products that are ubiquitously promoted are cramming our stores, screens, mailboxes and nearly every aspect of our lives.

Growing up in the digital age, Gen Z is the prime target for this consumerist culture. Their lives are catered toward finding flaws with what they currently own and buying the next best thing. In the process, our world lays waste, proving the disastrous effects of those spending habits.

Keep ReadingShow less
Iceberg hiding money below
wenmei Zhou/Getty Images

The hidden iceberg: Why corporate treasury spending matters

Freed is president and co-founder of the Center for Political Accountability.

Too much media coverage and other political analyses focus on contributions by corporate political action committees but overlook the serious consequences of political contributions made directly from corporate treasury funds.

In talks with corporate executives, the default too often is almost exclusively on company political engagement through its PAC. This ignores what one political scientist has likened to an iceberg of spending, where disclosure is not required (and hence is “dark money”) or is partial (only by the recipient, not the donor) and totals are much greater than the amounts allowed for PAC spending.

Keep ReadingShow less
hand reaching out over an American flag
Nikolay Ponomarenko/Getty Images

Big Philanthropy to the rescue? Think again.

Cain has served in leadership roles at numerous foundations, nonprofits and for-profit corporations. He was a founding partner of American Philanthropic.

As the media and elites across America take up a fight to “save democracy,” Big Philanthropy is casting itself in the role of superhero. Since 2011, the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for High Impact Philanthropy reports, some $5.7 billion has gone to programs supporting U.S. democracy, with grant announcements that often depict foundations as stepping up to forestall a doomsday.

The Carnegie Corporation, warning of a “fragility of our democracy ... unimaginable just a few years ago,” has pledged to strengthen social cohesion and combat polarization. The MacArthur Foundation is partnering with Carnegie and the Ford and Knight foundations, among others, in the $500 million Press Forward effort to “address the crisis in local news.” As Knight president Alberto Ibargüen put it to the New York Times: “There is a new understanding of the importance of information in the management of community, in the management of democracy in America.”

Keep ReadingShow less
American flag and business imagery
Sean Gladwell/Getty Images

How your company can follow the model for political spending

Freed is president and co-founder, Hanna is research director, and Sandstrom is strategic advisor at the Center for Political Accountability.

With corporate political disclosure and accountability accepted as the norm, the next step for responsible companies is to put in place a framework for approaching, governing and assessing their election-related spending. The framework would establish policies for when or whether to spend and a process for evaluating the benefits and risks associated with a decision to use corporate resources to advance a political cause or candidate.

Keep ReadingShow less
Superhero businessman revealing American flag
BrianAJackson/Getty Images

Are U.S. companies living up to their commitments to democracy?

Fordham is a PhD student in political science at the University of Washington. Brumbach is an associate professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley.

“[A]s a company, we have a responsibility to engage. For this reason, we are working together with other businesses through groups like the Business Roundtable to support efforts to enhance every person’s ability to vote.”

These were the words of AT&T CEO John Stankey, responding to a Georgia law that limited absentee voting. A similar bill proposed in Texas prompted Dell CEO Michael Dell to issue the following statement: “Free, fair, equitable access to voting is the foundation of American democracy. Those rights — especially for women, communities of color — have been hard-earned. Governments should ensure citizens have their voices heard. HB6 does the opposite, and we are opposed to it.”

The pattern is clear: U.S. business leaders are increasingly vocal in support of democratic institutions.

Keep ReadingShow less