Skip to content
Project 2025
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories
Plumes of smoke rise over the oil depot tanks hit by joint Israel-U.S.

Russia is Winning the War in Iran. Earth is Losing

​A group of youngsters help posting posters.

Combating America’s Toxic Polarization: Lessons from Northern Ireland’s Troubles

Cathy Alderman: Housing Is Healthcare

Cathy Alderman: Housing Is Healthcare

Full frame shot of pins that say “vote” with red, white, and blue American flag theme.

Spirit of 1776 – Rejected by Project 2025, Embraced by NPVIC

Democracy’s Crisis in Plain Sight: A Republic in Authoritarian Drift

Democracy’s Crisis in Plain Sight: A Republic in Authoritarian Drift

Defer to the Preamble

Defer to the Preamble
Getty Images
Leland R. Beaumont
By Leland R. BeaumontJul 12, 2023
Leland R. Beaumont
Leland R. Beaumont is a contributor for The Fulcrum, a nonpartisan publication dedicated to strengthening democracy by fostering informed civic engagement and elevating diverse perspectives.
See More Writings by author

Leland R. Beaumont is an independent wisdom researcher who is seeking real good. He is currently developing the Applied Wisdom curriculum on Wikiversity.

The many split decisions by the U.S. Supreme court justices demonstrate the ambiguity inherent in the U.S. Constitution. Fortunately, the Founding Fathers made their intentions clear in the P reamble to the Constitution where they say:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

This Preamble makes it clear the Founding Fathers intended the Constitution to “…promote the general Welfare …” of the people.

Compare the clarity of the Preamble to the dangerously ambiguous language of the Second Amendment. Ratified on December 15, 1791, it states:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

If one adopts an originalist view of the Constitution, which asserts that all statements in the Constitution must be interpreted based on the original understanding, then the Second Amendment means that if you are a member of a state militia and that militia is well regulated, you are free to carry your musket.

However, almost 250 years later in the era of high powered assault weapons interpretations of the Second Amendment now allow the purchase and open carry of assault type weapons, such as the AR-15-style rifle. This weapon has been prominent in mass shootings in the United States.

Fortunately, the clarity of the Preamble can help us resolve the ambiguity of the Second Amendment.

Knowing the Founding Fathers intended the Constitution to “…promote the general Welfare …” of the people we should ask ourselves if allowing purchase and use of AR-15-style rifles promotes the general welfare of the people.

This question can be answered empirically, for example by comparing the welfare of those killed and injured by AR-15 style rifles to the various benefits enjoyed by their owners. This information should be used by justices to form their opinions as they interpret the wishes of the Founding Fathers.

Promoting general welfare means that the government should see to it that the citizens of our country enjoy good fortune, health, and happiness to the benefit of as many people as possible, not just a few. By paying close attention to the preamble of the Constitution today’s Supreme Court will do a better job of fulfilling the wishes of our Founding Fathers.


Latest news

Grandmother and adult granddaughter sitting on windowsill
Economy

Washington’s Failure to Face Generation Imbalance is Divisive

Young group of people standing in circle using mobile phones outside. Unrecognizable teen friends watching social media content on smartphone app. Technology lifestyle concept.

Teens Are Confiding in AI. Instead, They Should Help Shape It.

Border Patrol surveillance network expands across Michigan highways
Rule of Law

Border Patrol surveillance network expands across Michigan highways

Read More

This Sheriff’s Office Says Racial Profiling Reforms Are Too Costly. Auditors Found It Misused $163 Million.

The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office misused $163 million intended to address racial profiling reforms, according to a court-mandated audit.

Illustrations by Shoshana Gordon, ProPublica.

This Sheriff’s Office Says Racial Profiling Reforms Are Too Costly. Auditors Found It Misused $163 Million.

More than $7,000 in cable TV subscriptions.

An $11,000 golf cart.

Keep ReadingShow less
When the Connection Frays: Systems, Stroke, and Institutional Fragility
a stethoscope and a heart on a table
Photo by Marek Studzinski on Unsplash

When the Connection Frays: Systems, Stroke, and Institutional Fragility

Three months ago, I had a stroke. Minor, as strokes go—my cognition is intact, my body largely functional. But something has changed in the wiring, and what I am observing in my own recovery has reframed how I think about institutional fragility and why complex systems fail where we least expect them to.

The Word I Cannot Find

Here is what a minor stroke actually feels like from the inside.

Keep ReadingShow less
High-Deductible Health Plans Are Being Sold as a Cure. They Aren’t.
a pile of pills and money sitting on top of a table
Photo by Çağlar Oskay on Unsplash

High-Deductible Health Plans Are Being Sold as a Cure. They Aren’t.

Recently, during rounds, I met a patient who almost missed her own heart attack. She'd had chest pain for hours before she finally came in. Clinicians know what those hours cost. When asked why she had waited, her answer made my own heart sink. She had a high-deductible health plan — an HDHP — which meant she would owe thousands of dollars before her insurance paid a single cent.

"It's like I don't even have insurance," she told me from her hospital bed, asking when someone from financial assistance would be able to speak to her.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democracy Awards Honor Bipartisan Excellence in Congressional Service
white concrete building under cloudy sky during daytime
Photo by Harold Mendoza on Unsplash

Democracy Awards Honor Bipartisan Excellence in Congressional Service

Now in their ninth year, the Democracy Awards are the Congressional Management Foundation’s (CMF) flagship program recognizing excellence in non-legislative achievement on Capitol Hill. Founded in 1977, CMF is the premier bipartisan 501(c)(3) foundation dedicated to strengthening the First Branch by providing Members of Congress and their staff with hands-on, actionable support and essential resources that help them govern effectively, better serve constituents, and strengthen the institution. Across seven categories, these bipartisan awards honor Members of Congress and their staff for outstanding public service and contributions to strengthening the First Branch.

Each year, following an open self-nomination season, one Democratic office and one Republican office are recognized in each award category, along with four recipients of the Chief of Staff of the Year award. Applications for the 2026 season opened in late January, and throughout the spring, CMF conducted 47 interviews across 45 congressional offices from a pool of 154 applications. Winners were selected by an independent panel in May and will be honored at both a Winner’s luncheon in June and a formal ceremony in Washington, D.C. in July. Through this process, the Democracy Awards shine a light on the exceptional work taking place on Capitol Hill that too often goes unnoticed.

Keep ReadingShow less
© Copyright 2026