Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Kathy Placencia

Rhode Island election official discusses transparency, top-down election administration, building trust among the community, and her love of sunsets.

News

Kathy Placencia is the director of elections for Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg M. Amore.

Kathy Placencia is the director of elections for Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg M. Amore.

Issue One.

More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.

Kathy Placencia is the director of elections for Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg M. Amore. Before joining the Department of State, Placencia served as the administrator of elections for the City of Providence for 17 years.


Placencia is a member of the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) and the Elections Assistance Commission (EAC). Placencia’s leadership led to her starring in the esteemed documentary “No Time to Fail,” which showcased election officials during the historic 2020 election. She frequently travels the nation to speak on panels to discuss the documentary and her expertise in elections.

Placencia previously served as a board member for Omni Development Corporation on the advisory board for R.I.S.E (Realizing Inspiration & Sustaining Excellence) Women’s Leadership Conference and as a board member of the Providence YMCA. She received her Bachelor of Science with a concentration in Human Services from Springfield College.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Issue One: How did you end up in the election administration profession?

Kathy Placencia: Totally by mistake. My background is in finance, and that's where I thought I wanted to be. I took a chance and went on an interview with our former secretary of state, Nellie Gorbea, who was then the deputy secretary in 2004. I was hired on the spot and started my job as the executive administrative assistant in the Department of Elections in March of 2004, the day before the presidential preference primary in Rhode Island.

In November of 2005, I was hired as the administrator of elections for the city of Providence, which is the largest community in Rhode Island. Then, I came back as the director of elections for our current secretary in January of 2023.

Issue One: What part of the election administration story in Rhode Island isn’t told enough, or isn’t widely understood enough?

Kathy Placencia: Here in Rhode Island, it's the roles and responsibilities of each entity. We have the Department of State, Elections Division, the Board of Elections, and our 39 municipalities, or 39 cities and towns that run their elections, because we are a top-down state. We're the only office that's led by an elected official. That can mean that we have to do extra work here to clarify what isn't in our purview. We are the people that are receiving the most calls related to elections.

We also deal with the Board of Elections, who actually tabulate and certify elections and are in charge of the election equipment, or the voting equipment. Our office is also in charge of civic education for the state, and we conduct a lot of mock elections in high schools. We're also in charge of the ballot creation and proofing and creating election guides for our local boards of canvassers, voters, and candidates. Then the 39 cities and towns run their local elections under the jurisdiction of the state Board of Elections. That is what is most misunderstood here in Rhode Island.

Issue One: What is a top-down state?

Kathy Placencia: The state Board of Elections is in charge of the procurement of the election equipment. Each of the 39 municipalities in Rhode Island operate in the same manner. They're not purchasing their own equipment. The state is purchasing the election equipment for them and the state Board of Elections maintains their election equipment. The cities and towns are in charge of hiring each of their polling officials to run elections in their communities, but the polling officials are trained by the state Board of Elections. The state is in charge of making sure that the ballot order for each community is perfect, and we place the ballot order based on previous voter turnout and what we feel the turnout will be.

Issue One: What are some of the greatest challenges to building confidence in elections in Rhode Island?

Kathy Placencia: The greatest challenges are mis- and disinformation. We think that we have things figured out and know how to reach people, but then another rumor pops up that we have to respond to. Other states do things that we have no control over, and that automatically sends people into a panic.

It’s important that people are informed of how elections work here. In the 2024 election, there was another state that wanted to keep our current president off of the ballot. But that’s not what we do in Rhode Island. It’s really important that people are informed of how elections work differently across the nation.

Issue One: Why do you think that voters should have trust in election processes and results, specifically in Rhode Island?

Kathy Placencia: We have risk-limiting audits, so voters can see the results and know that they aren’t different from what they voted for. Our processes are open to the public and anyone can sign up to be an auditor for the risk-limiting audit. Because we have that open process, we can work on building trust.

Issue One: Why is transparency in election administration important in your job? How have you worked to bring more transparency to the world of election administration?

Kathy Placencia: It's important for people to see what happens behind the scenes, right? But it's not even like it is behind the scenes, because all of what we do is public; it's public information. Everything that we do is publicly accessible. We’ve made an effort to have these election information town halls. We visit different communities, and we talk about how elections are conducted in Rhode Island. The general public can come and ask questions about the process that we will answer for them. A lot of people walk away having a better understanding of how elections work and more trust in how elections function. This gives people the opportunity to view how we run elections and what is happening “behind the scenes” to help build that trust. We also make ballots available before the election, so the public knows what will be on them.

Issue One: In recent years, election-related misconceptions, conspiracy theories, and lies have proliferated. How has this impacted your daily work?

Kathy Placencia: We are always working on making information public to disprove the conspiracies. We are also inundated with public record requests which take a lot of time. They also often make an impact on our daily work and often take time away from other projects that are going on. We can be in the ballot proofing process and we have public record requests that we have to take time to respond to based on the timeline provided. Based on that, I think people fail to understand that we’re actually humans running elections. It can be a lot. I can’t just click a button and then all of a sudden, the public record request has been filled. That’s a challenge.

There is also recruiting poll workers. The Board of Canvassers has a time recruiting poll workers because of fear of violence, which goes back to the spread of misinformation, conspiracies, or the misconceptions around elections.

Our secretary championed a bill to protect poll workers so that if anyone makes a threat to the poll officials or to election officials will have the same punishment as if they were making a threat to a judge.

Issue One: Given all of these challenges, what inspires you to stay in this line of work?

Kathy Placencia: I absolutely love what I do. I love everything about the process. It’s gratifying to know that I’ve completed this major task and that I’m helping people. I’m helping the voters, I’m educating candidates and the public. We’re making a difference.

Issue One: In the United States, election administration is not centralized and 50 states have 50 different election administration systems. What are the key features or nuances of the system in Rhode Island?

Kathy Placencia: That we have three different tiers. We have the Rhode Island Secretary of State's office, the Rhode Island State Board of Elections, and the local Boards of Canvassers. Also, what we all do, what our roles are in running elections, and how we work in conjunction with each other. In Rhode Island, we have strong relationships with our stakeholders, which is important. We are all just a phone call away.

Issue One: Many people are surprised to learn that the federal government doesn't routinely fund the cost of running elections. Why do you think the federal government should routinely fund election administration?

Kathy Placencia: It costs money to run efficient elections. Elections are a critical infrastructure, and it's important to invest in them. Funding doesn't just magically appear, and it's not like it doesn't cost money. It's not just the staff, there are other investments that it takes to run an efficient election. Whether you're hiring additional poll workers, or you have to purchase additional poll pads or election equipment, or you have to put in an order for additional ballots. Anytime that there's a change to an election law, it's not just automatically funded. There are laws that impact the way that we run elections and it costs money, whether it's an upgrade to the system or something else. Changes to federal and state laws have a financial impact on elections across the board. We’re constantly working to make sure that our election equipment is secure and safe. We have to keep up with that technology and those costs.

Issue One: Outside of being passionate about running safe and secure elections. What are your hobbies? Or what is a fun fact that most people might not know about you?

Kathy Placencia: Probably that I'm a sunset chaser. I love to be by the ocean. I love to watch the sunset. I think it's the most peaceful, calming, and energizing thing that you can do, there's just something about that. Even when my kids are away they'll send me pictures of the sunset or the sunrise in the morning.

We're the ocean state, so anything by the water is 20 minutes away. I will often look at the time that the sun is setting, grab my kids, go for a ride, and sit by the water listening to the waves crashing. We just sit in peace.

Issue One: What is your favorite book or movie?

Kathy Placencia: Believe it or not, “My Cousin Vinny” — I think it's hysterical. I can probably recite Marisa Tomei’s character and everything that she says in the movie.

Issue One: Which historical figure would you have most liked to have had an opportunity to meet?

Kathy Placencia: Oprah would be number one on my list. I think that everything that she's gone through, and the fact that she can remain so positive. I would love to meet her.

Angelina Clapp is the campaign manager for the Election Protection team at Issue One.

Read More

Framing "Freedom"

hands holding a sign that reads "FREEDOM"

Photo Credit: gpointstudio

Framing "Freedom"

The idea of “freedom” is important to Americans. It’s a value that resonates with a lot of people, and consistently ranks among the most important. It’s a uniquely powerful motivator, with broad appeal across the political spectrum. No wonder, then, that we as communicators often appeal to the value of freedom when making a case for change.

But too often, I see people understand values as magic words that can be dropped into our communications and work exactly the way we want them to. Don’t get me wrong: “freedom” is a powerful word. But simply mentioning freedom doesn’t automatically lead everyone to support the policies we want or behave the way we’d like.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hands resting on another.

Amid headlines about Epstein, survivors’ voices remain overlooked. This piece explores how restorative justice offers CSA survivors healing and choice.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

What Do Epstein’s Victims Need?

Jeffrey Epstein is all over the news, along with anyone who may have known about, enabled, or participated in his systematic child sexual abuse. Yet there is significantly less information and coverage on the perspectives, stories and named needs of these survivors themselves. This is almost always the case for any type of coverage on incidences of sexual violence – we first ask “how should we punish the offender?”, before ever asking “what does the survivor want?” For way too long, survivors of sexual violence, particularly of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), have been cast to the wayside, treated like witnesses to crimes committed against the state, rather than the victims of individuals that have caused them enormous harm. This de-emphasis on direct survivors of CSA is often presented as a form of “protection” or “respect for their privacy” and while keeping survivors safe is of the utmost importance, so is the centering and meeting of their needs, even when doing so means going against the grain of what the general public or criminal legal system think are conventional or acceptable responses to violence. Restorative justice (RJ) is one of those “unconventional” responses to CSA and yet there is a growing number of survivors who are naming it as a form of meeting their needs for justice and accountability. But what is restorative justice and why would a CSA survivor ever want it?

“You’re the most powerful person I’ve ever known and you did not deserve what I did to you.” These words were spoken toward the end of a “victim offender dialogue”, a restorative justice process in which an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse had elected to meet face-to-face for a facilitated conversation with the person that had harmed her. This phrase was said by the man who had violently sexually abused her in her youth, as he sat directly across from her, now an adult woman. As these two people looked at each other at that moment, the shift in power became tangible, as did a dissolvement of shame in both parties. Despite having gone through a formal court process, this survivor needed more…more space to ask questions, to name the impacts this violence had and continues to have in her life, to speak her truth directly to the person that had harmed her more than anyone else, and to reclaim her power. We often talk about the effects of restorative justice in the abstract, generally ineffable and far too personal to be classifiable; but in that instant, it was a felt sense, it was a moment of undeniable healing for all those involved and a form of justice and accountability that this survivor had sought for a long time, yet had not received until that instance.

Keep ReadingShow less
Labeling Dissent As Terrorism: New US Domestic Terrorism Priorities Raise Constitutional Alarms

A new Trump administration policy threatens to undermine foundational American commitments to free speech and association.

Labeling Dissent As Terrorism: New US Domestic Terrorism Priorities Raise Constitutional Alarms

A largely overlooked directive issued by the Trump administration marks a major shift in U.S. counterterrorism policy, one that threatens bedrock free speech rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights.

National Security Presidential Memorandum/NSPM-7, issued on Sept. 25, 2025, is a presidential directive that for the first time appears to authorize preemptive law enforcement measures against Americans based not on whether they are planning to commit violence but for their political or ideological beliefs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Someone holding a microphone.

Personal stories from constituents can profoundly shape lawmakers’ decisions. This excerpt shows how citizen advocacy influences Congress and drives real policy change.

Getty Images, EyeEm Mobile GmbH

Want to Influence Government? Start With Your Story

[The following article is excerpted from "Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."]


Rep. Nanette Barragán (D-California) wanted to make a firm statement in support of continued funding of the federal government’s Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) during the recent government shutdown debate. But instead of making a speech on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, she traveled to the Wilmington neighborhood of her Los Angeles district to a YMCA that was distributing fresh food and vegetables to people in need. She posted stories on X and described, in very practical terms, the people she met, their family stories, and the importance of food assistance programs.

Keep ReadingShow less