Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Kathy Placencia

Rhode Island election official discusses transparency, top-down election administration, building trust among the community, and her love of sunsets.

News

Kathy Placencia is the director of elections for Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg M. Amore.

Kathy Placencia is the director of elections for Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg M. Amore.

Issue One.

More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.

Kathy Placencia is the director of elections for Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg M. Amore. Before joining the Department of State, Placencia served as the administrator of elections for the City of Providence for 17 years.


Placencia is a member of the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) and the Elections Assistance Commission (EAC). Placencia’s leadership led to her starring in the esteemed documentary “No Time to Fail,” which showcased election officials during the historic 2020 election. She frequently travels the nation to speak on panels to discuss the documentary and her expertise in elections.

Placencia previously served as a board member for Omni Development Corporation on the advisory board for R.I.S.E (Realizing Inspiration & Sustaining Excellence) Women’s Leadership Conference and as a board member of the Providence YMCA. She received her Bachelor of Science with a concentration in Human Services from Springfield College.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Issue One: How did you end up in the election administration profession?

Kathy Placencia: Totally by mistake. My background is in finance, and that's where I thought I wanted to be. I took a chance and went on an interview with our former secretary of state, Nellie Gorbea, who was then the deputy secretary in 2004. I was hired on the spot and started my job as the executive administrative assistant in the Department of Elections in March of 2004, the day before the presidential preference primary in Rhode Island.

In November of 2005, I was hired as the administrator of elections for the city of Providence, which is the largest community in Rhode Island. Then, I came back as the director of elections for our current secretary in January of 2023.

Issue One: What part of the election administration story in Rhode Island isn’t told enough, or isn’t widely understood enough?

Kathy Placencia: Here in Rhode Island, it's the roles and responsibilities of each entity. We have the Department of State, Elections Division, the Board of Elections, and our 39 municipalities, or 39 cities and towns that run their elections, because we are a top-down state. We're the only office that's led by an elected official. That can mean that we have to do extra work here to clarify what isn't in our purview. We are the people that are receiving the most calls related to elections.

We also deal with the Board of Elections, who actually tabulate and certify elections and are in charge of the election equipment, or the voting equipment. Our office is also in charge of civic education for the state, and we conduct a lot of mock elections in high schools. We're also in charge of the ballot creation and proofing and creating election guides for our local boards of canvassers, voters, and candidates. Then the 39 cities and towns run their local elections under the jurisdiction of the state Board of Elections. That is what is most misunderstood here in Rhode Island.

Issue One: What is a top-down state?

Kathy Placencia: The state Board of Elections is in charge of the procurement of the election equipment. Each of the 39 municipalities in Rhode Island operate in the same manner. They're not purchasing their own equipment. The state is purchasing the election equipment for them and the state Board of Elections maintains their election equipment. The cities and towns are in charge of hiring each of their polling officials to run elections in their communities, but the polling officials are trained by the state Board of Elections. The state is in charge of making sure that the ballot order for each community is perfect, and we place the ballot order based on previous voter turnout and what we feel the turnout will be.

Issue One: What are some of the greatest challenges to building confidence in elections in Rhode Island?

Kathy Placencia: The greatest challenges are mis- and disinformation. We think that we have things figured out and know how to reach people, but then another rumor pops up that we have to respond to. Other states do things that we have no control over, and that automatically sends people into a panic.

It’s important that people are informed of how elections work here. In the 2024 election, there was another state that wanted to keep our current president off of the ballot. But that’s not what we do in Rhode Island. It’s really important that people are informed of how elections work differently across the nation.

Issue One: Why do you think that voters should have trust in election processes and results, specifically in Rhode Island?

Kathy Placencia: We have risk-limiting audits, so voters can see the results and know that they aren’t different from what they voted for. Our processes are open to the public and anyone can sign up to be an auditor for the risk-limiting audit. Because we have that open process, we can work on building trust.

Issue One: Why is transparency in election administration important in your job? How have you worked to bring more transparency to the world of election administration?

Kathy Placencia: It's important for people to see what happens behind the scenes, right? But it's not even like it is behind the scenes, because all of what we do is public; it's public information. Everything that we do is publicly accessible. We’ve made an effort to have these election information town halls. We visit different communities, and we talk about how elections are conducted in Rhode Island. The general public can come and ask questions about the process that we will answer for them. A lot of people walk away having a better understanding of how elections work and more trust in how elections function. This gives people the opportunity to view how we run elections and what is happening “behind the scenes” to help build that trust. We also make ballots available before the election, so the public knows what will be on them.

Issue One: In recent years, election-related misconceptions, conspiracy theories, and lies have proliferated. How has this impacted your daily work?

Kathy Placencia: We are always working on making information public to disprove the conspiracies. We are also inundated with public record requests which take a lot of time. They also often make an impact on our daily work and often take time away from other projects that are going on. We can be in the ballot proofing process and we have public record requests that we have to take time to respond to based on the timeline provided. Based on that, I think people fail to understand that we’re actually humans running elections. It can be a lot. I can’t just click a button and then all of a sudden, the public record request has been filled. That’s a challenge.

There is also recruiting poll workers. The Board of Canvassers has a time recruiting poll workers because of fear of violence, which goes back to the spread of misinformation, conspiracies, or the misconceptions around elections.

Our secretary championed a bill to protect poll workers so that if anyone makes a threat to the poll officials or to election officials will have the same punishment as if they were making a threat to a judge.

Issue One: Given all of these challenges, what inspires you to stay in this line of work?

Kathy Placencia: I absolutely love what I do. I love everything about the process. It’s gratifying to know that I’ve completed this major task and that I’m helping people. I’m helping the voters, I’m educating candidates and the public. We’re making a difference.

Issue One: In the United States, election administration is not centralized and 50 states have 50 different election administration systems. What are the key features or nuances of the system in Rhode Island?

Kathy Placencia: That we have three different tiers. We have the Rhode Island Secretary of State's office, the Rhode Island State Board of Elections, and the local Boards of Canvassers. Also, what we all do, what our roles are in running elections, and how we work in conjunction with each other. In Rhode Island, we have strong relationships with our stakeholders, which is important. We are all just a phone call away.

Issue One: Many people are surprised to learn that the federal government doesn't routinely fund the cost of running elections. Why do you think the federal government should routinely fund election administration?

Kathy Placencia: It costs money to run efficient elections. Elections are a critical infrastructure, and it's important to invest in them. Funding doesn't just magically appear, and it's not like it doesn't cost money. It's not just the staff, there are other investments that it takes to run an efficient election. Whether you're hiring additional poll workers, or you have to purchase additional poll pads or election equipment, or you have to put in an order for additional ballots. Anytime that there's a change to an election law, it's not just automatically funded. There are laws that impact the way that we run elections and it costs money, whether it's an upgrade to the system or something else. Changes to federal and state laws have a financial impact on elections across the board. We’re constantly working to make sure that our election equipment is secure and safe. We have to keep up with that technology and those costs.

Issue One: Outside of being passionate about running safe and secure elections. What are your hobbies? Or what is a fun fact that most people might not know about you?

Kathy Placencia: Probably that I'm a sunset chaser. I love to be by the ocean. I love to watch the sunset. I think it's the most peaceful, calming, and energizing thing that you can do, there's just something about that. Even when my kids are away they'll send me pictures of the sunset or the sunrise in the morning.

We're the ocean state, so anything by the water is 20 minutes away. I will often look at the time that the sun is setting, grab my kids, go for a ride, and sit by the water listening to the waves crashing. We just sit in peace.

Issue One: What is your favorite book or movie?

Kathy Placencia: Believe it or not, “My Cousin Vinny” — I think it's hysterical. I can probably recite Marisa Tomei’s character and everything that she says in the movie.

Issue One: Which historical figure would you have most liked to have had an opportunity to meet?

Kathy Placencia: Oprah would be number one on my list. I think that everything that she's gone through, and the fact that she can remain so positive. I would love to meet her.

Angelina Clapp is the campaign manager for the Election Protection team at Issue One.


Read More

Macbeth’s Warning: How Ambition and Power Threaten Our Democracy

Engraving of three witches around a bubbling cauldron in a cave summoning an apparition of a rising demon in the background recalling a scene from Shakespeare's Macbeth..Image found in an 1881 book: "Zig Zag Journeys in the Orient" Published by John Wilson & Son, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Getty Images, KenWiedemann

Macbeth’s Warning: How Ambition and Power Threaten Our Democracy

“Something wicked this way comes…” chant the three witches in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, hailing the former general, now the new king of Scotland.

And indeed, something wicked this way has come to us, in the threat that we are facing to our democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors standing in front of government military tanks.

People attend a pro-government rally on January 12, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. Tens of thousands of demonstrators gathered in Tehran's Enqelab Square on Monday, as Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of the Iranian parliament, made a speech denouncing western intervention in Iran, following ongoing anti-government protests.

Getty Images

Changing Iran: With Help from Political Geographers on the Ground

INTRODUCTION

This article suggests a different path out of the present excursionist war. This would be a diplomatic effort with ample incentives to MAGA-Israel and the Conservative Shia Theocratic Khamenei Regime (CSTKR) to stop the war. In exchange for the U.S. and Israel stopping the bombing in Iran, this effort would allow the CSTKR to survive and thrive. They could keep and promote their belief that the return of the Muhammad al-Mahdi, the 12th Imam, who disappeared in 874 CE, is key to bringing on the end times to establish peace and justice on earth. While most people would endorse the attainment of peace and justice on earth, they would strongly object to its connection to try to actualize it through violent struggle.

This effort would assist Iran to thrive via the removal of sanctions, substantial technical and economic assistance, help in developing its civilian nuclear program, and letting them keep and maintain a mine-cleared Strait of Hormuz and charge tolls, similar to what Egypt levies for the Suez Canal. Charging tolls provides a strong incentive to keep that waterway open, maintained, and safe. It becomes an additional opportunity cost to keep it closed. The CSTKR and its proxy militias, in turn, must stop their bombing and terror campaigns and, in addition, the CSTKR must let the Strait of Hormuz be quickly opened, give up materials that can be used to build nuclear weapons, and accept the political reconfiguration of Iran as outlined here.

Keep ReadingShow less
A protestor holding a sign that reads "Hey Congress Do Your Job."

Omayra Hernadez holds a sign reading, "Hey Congress Do Your Job" as she and others gather in front of the office of Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) to protest against the partial government shutdown on October 15, 2013 in Doral, Florida.

Getty Images, Joe Raedle

Congress Isn’t Failing—It’s Choosing Not to Govern

Introduction: A Fight That Wasn’t Really About Funding

“We should not be afraid of a government shutdown.”

That was the message from Rep. Chip Roy as Republicans clashed over funding the Department of Homeland Security.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less