Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Efforts to fix Congress gain traction

Efforts to fix Congress gain traction
Getty Images

Chris McIsaac is a fellow with the R Street Institute’s governance program.

Congress nearly shut down the federal government for the second time in less than five years over the weekend as lawmakers struggled to reach a spending agreement by September 30. They ultimately approved a 45 day extension as the deadline approached but the entire spectacle was the latest evidence in support of the longstanding view that Congress is not up to its job.
Nonetheless, there is some hope for restoring a functioning legislative branch. Representative Derek Kilmer (D-Wash.) and Representative William Timmons (R-S.C.) recently announced the creation of the Fix Congress Caucus which will support efforts to reform and modernize the people’s branch. This is the latest development in a bipartisan multi-year effort to identify and implement improvements to all aspects of operations in the House of Representatives.


Reps. Kilmer and Timmons were the past chair and vice chair of the Select Committee on Congressional Modernization, which met during the 116th and 117th Congresses. They published two reports, one in 2020 and another in 2022, in which 202 improvements were recommended. To date, 53 of the Select Committee recommendations have been put into effect while another 87 are partially implemented. Two changes that still require legislative action include adjustments to the House payroll system, which would allow staff to be paid twice per month instead of monthly, and improved access to agency contact information, which would help district caseworkers better serve constituents.

When the Select Committee disbanded at the end of the last Congress, the Committee on House Administration established a Subcommittee on Modernization to manage the implementation of recommendations. Rep. Stephanie Bice (R-Okla.) chairs this subcommittee and Rep. Kilmer has stayed on as the ranking member. The Fix Congress Caucus will complement House Admin’s work by serving as a forum for discussing new modernization ideas as well as how best to continue implementing proposed reforms.

The creation of the caucus and subcommittee is significant because it helps establish a culture of continuous improvement in Congress. Historically, efforts like these have occurred infrequently. The 2020 Select Committee Final Report notes that the last modernization initiative occurred back in 1993–and we know how vastly technology has altered society in the last thirty years. Clearly, this work is long overdue. Another benefit of the subcommittee in particular is the opportunity to continue experimenting with alternative committee procedures designed to encourage bipartisanship. This was a hallmark of Select Committee meetings during the last Congress. The committee was noted for utilizing equal committee representation of six Democrats and six Republicans, hiring committee staff on a nonpartisan basis, and configuring meeting spaces to encourage dialogue across party lines. While these changes might appear minor to the casual observer, they are far outside the norms of a typical congressional committee. Overall, these efforts to improve and modernize operations, encourage bipartisanship, and create a culture of continuous improvement are welcome changes for a Congress that often struggles to consistently fulfill its basic duties to the American people. Reversing bad habits developed over decades will take time, but the modernization work completed during the past five years has helped chart a model path forward in the 118th Congress and beyond.


Read More

The Iranian regime does not fear Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a signing ceremony for the “Secure America Act” in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 10, 2026.

(Ken Cedeno/AFP via Getty Images/TCA)

The Iranian regime does not fear Trump

Back in 2012, President Barack Obama issued a statement at a press conference that would change his presidency and his legacy forever.

It was a year into what would become Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad’s brutal and protracted war on his own people, a war that would cost hundreds of thousands of lives, empower Iran and Russia, and destabilize much of the region.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Constitution of the United States

A look at America's growing crisis of trust, rising inequality, technology's impact, and how founding principles can help renew democracy.

Tetra Images / Getty Images

People Are Hurting: The U.S. Needs to Return to Our Founding Principles

There are many ways in which our country is currently struggling, both from a government perspective and from the people's perspective. There is no shortage of articles or studies detailing the ways in which the country and its leaders are failing us.

A recent article by Nicholas Kristof in The New York Times discussed the report of the State of the Nation Project—written by a bipartisan group of experts—that assessed the state of our country on 31 measures. Bottom line, it found that too many people do not feel good about their lives, about other people, or our institutions. This is a nationwide phenomenon; the worst performers may be red states in the South, but liberal states in the North and West have the same problems. And it's not a function of prosperous versus less-prosperous states.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection

The Trump Justice Department faces scrutiny over alleged prosecutorial misconduct, political pressure, and threats to the rule of law and judicial integrity.

Aitor Diago / Getty Images

Is There Anything That Trump’s Justice Department Lawyers Won’t Do?

There was a time when working for the United States Department of Justice might have been a lawyer’s dream. Speaking on behalf of the United States, working with people who were dedicated to preserving the rule of law and upholding the highest standards of professionalism, not a bad gig.

As Harvard Law School once explained, the department offered lawyers an unparalleled “opportunity to serve the public in a meaningful way while carrying out the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) mandate to ‘pursue justice’ every day…” Not a bad gig.

Keep ReadingShow less
If the GOP Closes Its Primary, Taxpayers Should Close Their Wallets

wallet with dollar bills, on top of an American flag

hartcreations/Getty Images

If the GOP Closes Its Primary, Taxpayers Should Close Their Wallets

A recent court ruling allowing the Colorado Republican Party to decide how and whether to close its primary elections comes at a pivotal moment for the state’s election system. For nearly a decade, Colorado has had an open primary; one designed to reflect the state’s growing share of independent voters. The decision now raises a fundamental question: should taxpayers continue to fund an election that restricts large numbers of the public?

Colorado’s primary elections are not private affairs. They are administered by the state, financed by taxpayers, and conducted through public infrastructure. Ballots are printed and mailed by government offices. Election workers are trained and compensated with public funds. In every functional sense, primaries are public elections.

Keep ReadingShow less