Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Efforts to fix Congress gain traction

Efforts to fix Congress gain traction
Getty Images

Chris McIsaac is a fellow with the R Street Institute’s governance program.

Congress nearly shut down the federal government for the second time in less than five years over the weekend as lawmakers struggled to reach a spending agreement by September 30. They ultimately approved a 45 day extension as the deadline approached but the entire spectacle was the latest evidence in support of the longstanding view that Congress is not up to its job.
Nonetheless, there is some hope for restoring a functioning legislative branch. Representative Derek Kilmer (D-Wash.) and Representative William Timmons (R-S.C.) recently announced the creation of the Fix Congress Caucus which will support efforts to reform and modernize the people’s branch. This is the latest development in a bipartisan multi-year effort to identify and implement improvements to all aspects of operations in the House of Representatives.


Reps. Kilmer and Timmons were the past chair and vice chair of the Select Committee on Congressional Modernization, which met during the 116th and 117th Congresses. They published two reports, one in 2020 and another in 2022, in which 202 improvements were recommended. To date, 53 of the Select Committee recommendations have been put into effect while another 87 are partially implemented. Two changes that still require legislative action include adjustments to the House payroll system, which would allow staff to be paid twice per month instead of monthly, and improved access to agency contact information, which would help district caseworkers better serve constituents.

When the Select Committee disbanded at the end of the last Congress, the Committee on House Administration established a Subcommittee on Modernization to manage the implementation of recommendations. Rep. Stephanie Bice (R-Okla.) chairs this subcommittee and Rep. Kilmer has stayed on as the ranking member. The Fix Congress Caucus will complement House Admin’s work by serving as a forum for discussing new modernization ideas as well as how best to continue implementing proposed reforms.

The creation of the caucus and subcommittee is significant because it helps establish a culture of continuous improvement in Congress. Historically, efforts like these have occurred infrequently. The 2020 Select Committee Final Report notes that the last modernization initiative occurred back in 1993–and we know how vastly technology has altered society in the last thirty years. Clearly, this work is long overdue. Another benefit of the subcommittee in particular is the opportunity to continue experimenting with alternative committee procedures designed to encourage bipartisanship. This was a hallmark of Select Committee meetings during the last Congress. The committee was noted for utilizing equal committee representation of six Democrats and six Republicans, hiring committee staff on a nonpartisan basis, and configuring meeting spaces to encourage dialogue across party lines. While these changes might appear minor to the casual observer, they are far outside the norms of a typical congressional committee. Overall, these efforts to improve and modernize operations, encourage bipartisanship, and create a culture of continuous improvement are welcome changes for a Congress that often struggles to consistently fulfill its basic duties to the American people. Reversing bad habits developed over decades will take time, but the modernization work completed during the past five years has helped chart a model path forward in the 118th Congress and beyond.


Read More

An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs at a rally, one reads, "Trump is not above the law."

Protesters gather at a Nobody Is Above the Law rally protesting President Trump's interference in the Mueller investigation on November 08, 2018 in Washington, DC.

Larry French/Getty Images

The Double Standard Presidency: When We Watch Leaders Act Above the Law

Americans are told that no one is above the law. Yet every day, they watch a president behave in ways that would get any ordinary citizen fired, disciplined, confronted, or held accountable — and they watch some Americans excuse it. What makes this moment even more striking is that critics across the political spectrum, including conservatives, now warn that the presidency is operating on a dangerous double standard. This is not a partisan concern. It is a constitutional one. And it is tearing at the fabric of our democracy.

For generations, the Constitution has provided guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, oversight mechanisms, and limits on executive authority — designed to prevent any leader from functioning above the law. The framers feared concentrated power more than anything else. They believed that the presidency must be constrained not only by written law but by norms of restraint, dignity, and respect for institutions. Those norms held for centuries because presidents understood that the office was larger than any individual, and Congress understood that oversight was not optional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Latino immigrants and U.S.-born Latinos differ sharply in how much their identity shapes their daily lives, according to recent findings from the Pew Research Center’s 2025 National Survey of Latinos. The survey shows that Latino immigrants are far more likely than U.S.-born Latinos to say their identity is central to who they are, and that it influences their experiences in the United States. Pew researchers Gabriel Piña, Mark Hugo Lopez, Sahana Mukherjee, Dalia Fahmy, and Alexandra Cahn report that the divide reflects differences in cultural connection, lived experience, and generational distance from immigrant roots.

Pew’s analysis finds that Latino immigrants are significantly more likely to say their origins are central to their identity, while U.S.-born Latinos — especially those in the third generation or higher — are less likely to feel that connection. The report notes that “U.S. Hispanics are divided on whether their identity helps or hurts them in America,” with some respondents describing their Latino identity as a source of pride and connection, and others saying it is tied to discrimination or barriers.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Clerk Matthew Sandbar, 34, demonstrates part of the ballot-sorting process to members of the media attending a walkthrough of the Philadelphia Ballot Processing Center used to process the ballots of the 2022 US midterm elections, in Philadelphia on October 27, 2022.

Photo by Ryan Collerd / AFP via Getty Images

A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Tallying the results of Washington, DC’s first ranked-choice election in June took about 10 days—longer than many voters are used to. In an age when artificial intelligence can generate an answer in seconds, waiting days for election results can feel old-fashioned, inefficient, even suspicious. And it is about to matter far more widely. This November, 17 states, cities, and counties will use ranked-choice voting, including Maine and Alaska statewide, in races that could help decide control of Congress. More voters than ever will watch results take days to resolve, and more will be asked to trust a count they cannot see.

But that slowness may be one of its most democratic features.

Keep ReadingShow less