Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Governor wants Florida to boost security spending ahead of the election

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' request for $6.6 million in election security spending is expected to get a positive response from the Legislature.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Gov. Ron DeSantis asked his fellow Republicans at the Florida statehouse on Wednesday to spend $6.6 million for election oversight and improved ballot security ahead of the next election.

The request was part of a comprehensive state budget submission delivered to the Legislature. It is significant because the reliability of Florida's elections will be particularly important next year. The state's 29 electoral votes are the third biggest prize in the presidential race and have been closely contested in every recent election — with a problematic history along the way.


Amid a raft of controversies centered on confusing, antiquated and otherwise unreliable balloting procedures in 2000, the presidency was decided for George W. Bush by an official margin of only 537 votes out of almost 6 million cast. In 2016, Donald Trump carried the state by just 1.2 percentage points.

Florida was identified as the target of election hacking in 2016 in the report by special counsel Robert Mueller. In a follow-up meeting with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, DeSantis was told that voter registration systems in two counties were breached. No votes were affected by the hacking, authorities said.

The DeSantis budget for 2020-21 is likely to be received warmly in Tallahassee, where Republicans have solid control of the state House and Senate. It includes $1.4 million to hire 10 cybersecurity experts to provide help to local election officials. Other proposals include:

  • $1 million for cybersecurity initiatives.
  • $1.4 million for voter registration list maintenance.
  • $1.5 million to reimburse counties for the cost of special elections.
  • $1.3 million for advertising constitutional amendments.
  • $100,000 for a small grant program for election-related actions.

Read More

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Crowd of people walking on a street.

Andy Andrews//Getty Images

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Biologist and author Paul Ehrlich, the most influential Chicken Little of the last century, died at the age of 93 this week. His 1968 book, “The Population Bomb,” launched decades of institutional panic in government, entertainment and journalism.

Ehrlich’s core neo-Malthusian argument was that overpopulation would exhaust the supply of food and natural resources, leading to a cascade of catastrophes around the world. “The Population Bomb” opens with a bold prediction, “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A student in uniform walking through a campus.

A Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadet walks through campus November 7, 2003 in Princeton, New Jersey.

Getty Images, Spencer Platt

Hegseth is Dumbing Down the Military (on Purpose)

One day before the United States began an ill-defined and illegal war of indefinite length with Iran, Pete Hegseth angrily attacked a different enemy: the Ivy League. The Secretary of War denounced Ivy League universities as "woke breeding grounds of toxic indoctrination” and then eliminated long-standing college fellowship programs with more than a dozen elite colleges, which had historically served as a pipeline for service members to the upper ranks of military leadership. Of the schools now on Hegseth’s "no-fly list," four sit in the top ten of the World’s Top Universities for 2026. So, why does the Secretary of War not want his armed forces to have the best education available? Because he wants a military without a brain.

For a guy obsessed with being the strongest and most lethal force in the world, cutting access to world-class schools is a bizarre gambit. It does reveal Hegseth doesn’t consider intelligence a factor–let alone an asset–in strength or lethality. That tracks. Hegseth alleges the Ivies infect officers with “globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks…” God forbid the tip of the sword of our foreign policy has knowledge of international cooperation and global interconnectedness. The Ivy League has its own issues, but the Pentagon’s claim that they "fail to deliver rigorous education grounded in realism” is almost laughable. I’m a veteran Lieutenant Commander with two Ivy League degrees, both paid for with military tuition assistance, and I promise: it was rigorous. Meanwhile, are Hegseth’s performative politics grounded in reality? Attacking Harvard on social media the eve of initiating a new war with a foreign adversary is disgraceful, and even delusional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?
Person working at a desk with a laptop and books.

Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?

Draft an important email without using AI. Write it from scratch — no suggestions, no autocomplete, and no prompt to ChatGPT to compose or revise the email.

Now ask yourself: Did it feel slower? Harder? Slightly uncomfortable?

Keep ReadingShow less