Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Kemp's claim that Democrats hacked state election site not true, report finds

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp

Gov. Brian Kemp charged late in the 2018 campaign, when he was still secretary of state, that Democrats had hacked into Georgia's election websites. An investigation unveiled this week found that the charge was not true.

Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images

A sensational charge levied by Republican Brian Kemp during his savage but successful campaign for governor of Georgia against Democrat Stacey Abrams has not yielded any criminal charges.

Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, also a Republican, issued a three-page memo on Monday stating he did not find evidence to back Kemp's claim two years ago that Democrats had hacked into the computer system of the secretary of state, the position Kemp held when he ran.

He defeated Abrams by 54,000 votes out of 3.9 million cast, a margin of less than 1.5 points, and Democrats said Kemp's claim was one of his many ploys to gain political advantage — along with what they view as a multifaceted campaign of voter suppression


The claim originated from a report made by Georgia businessman Richard Wright that several election-related pages on the secretary of state's website were vulnerable to an enemy cyber invasion. Those claims were passed to a volunteer with the state Democratic Party and ended up in Kemp's office, which prompted his allegation.

But investigations of Wright's claims found them not to be accurate. While the web pages had been vulnerable, such problems had been fixed.

Did anyone actually hack the site? Prior intrusions into the site were actually cybersecurity tests conducted by the federal Department of Homeland Security, which had been contracted by Kemp's office to do the work.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Read More

Supreme Court
Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Gerrymandering and voting rights under review by Supreme Court again

On Dec. 13, The Fulcrum identified the worst examples of congressional gerrymandering currently in use.

In that news report, David Meyers wrote:

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view diverse voters waiting for polling place to open
SDI Productions/Getty Images

Open primary advocates must embrace the historic principles of change

This was a big year for the open primaries movement. Seven state-level campaigns and one municipal. Millions of voters declaring their support for open primaries. New leaders emerging across the country. Primary elections for the first time at the center of the national reform debate.

But with six out of eight campaigns failing at the ballot box, it’s also an important moment of reflection.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Vote Here" sign
Grace Cary/Getty Images

The path forward for electoral reform

The National Association of Nonpartisan Reformers hosted its post-election gathering Dec. 2-4 in San Diego. More than 120 leaders from across the country convened to reflect on the November elections, where reform campaigns achieved mixed results with multiple state losses, and to chart a path forward for nonpartisan electoral reforms. As the Bridge Alliance Education Fund is a founding member of NANR and I currently serve on the board, I attended the gathering in hopes of getting some insight on how we can best serve the collective needs of the electoral reform community in the coming year.

Keep ReadingShow less
Peopel waiting in line near a sign that reads "Vote Here: Polling Place"

People wait to vote in the 2024 election at city hall in Anchorage, Alaska.

Hasan Akbas/Anadolu via Getty Images

How Alaska is making government work again

At the end of a bitter and closely divided election season, there’s a genuine bright spot for democracy from our 49th state: Alaskans decided to keep the state’s system of open primaries and ranked choice voting because it is working.

This is good news not only for Alaska, but for all of us ready for a government that works together to get things done for voters.

Keep ReadingShow less