Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Latest Democratic suit challenges Texas 'wet signature' rule

keyboard
ardaguldogan/Getty Images

Texas Democrats and the party's national campaign arms filed a federal lawsuit Monday challenging a state rule that prohibits electronic signatures on voter registration forms.

In 2018, the rule led county election officials (acting on orders from the Republican secretary of state at the time, Rolando Pablos) to reject more than 2,400 voter forms just days before the registration deadline — in violation of the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act, the lawsuit contends.

The suit is the latest in a wave of litigation brought by Democrats hoping the courts will ease access to the ballot box this November, in an array of states where the presidential contest could be competitive or where Republicans are pushing more restrictions on voting.


The forms at issue in Texas were distributed to county officials by Vote.org, a nonpartisan voter registration platform that allows citizens to fill out and sign an application by uploading a photographic image of their signature. The website later faxed and mailed the electronically signed applications to county election officials, who were told five days before the deadline to discard them.

The so-called "wet signature rule" violates federal voting rights protections by "selectively targeting and burdening private organizations' efforts to increase voter turnout and imposing an arbitrary barrier to registration," the lawsuit argues.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The rule is arbitrary, according to the plaintiffs, because the state accepts electronic signatures on other official documents, including voter registration forms submitted through the Texas Department of Public Safety.

Texas is one of 13 states that doesn't provide access to online voter registration.

The filing is the third voting rights lawsuit filed against Texas in the past four months by attorneys for the Texas Democratic Party, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

In October, the coalition sued the state over a new law that effectively ended the use of mobile voting sites during early voting. A month later, the group filed a second lawsuit targeting a long-standing law that required the name of candidates who belonged to the same political party as the governor to be listed first on general election ballots.

Perkins Coie, the law firm representing the plaintiffs in the latest case, has filed 14 voting rights lawsuits in a dozen states over the past three months as part of a nationwide strategy to increase voter turnout this fall.



Read More

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

Someone filling out a ballot.

Getty Images / Hill Street Studios

Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

In the 2024 U.S. election, several states did not pass ballot initiatives to implement Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) despite strong majority support from voters under 65. Still, RCV was defended in Alaska, passed by a landslide in Washington, D.C., and has earned majority support in 31 straight pro-RCV city ballot measures. Still, some critics of RCV argue that it does not enhance and promote democratic principles as much as forms of proportional representation (PR), as commonly used throughout Europe and Latin America.

However, in the U.S. many people have not heard of PR. The question under consideration is whether implementing RCV serves as a stepping stone to PR by building public understanding and support for reforms that move away from winner-take-all systems. Utilizing a nationally representative sample of respondents (N=1000) on the 2022 Cooperative Election Survey (CES), results show that individuals who favor RCV often also know about and back PR. When comparing other types of electoral reforms, RCV uniquely transfers into support for PR, in ways that support for nonpartisan redistricting and the national popular vote do not. These findings can inspire efforts that demonstrate how RCV may facilitate the adoption of PR in the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less