Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Latest Democratic suit challenges Texas 'wet signature' rule

keyboard
ardaguldogan/Getty Images

Texas Democrats and the party's national campaign arms filed a federal lawsuit Monday challenging a state rule that prohibits electronic signatures on voter registration forms.

In 2018, the rule led county election officials (acting on orders from the Republican secretary of state at the time, Rolando Pablos) to reject more than 2,400 voter forms just days before the registration deadline — in violation of the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act, the lawsuit contends.

The suit is the latest in a wave of litigation brought by Democrats hoping the courts will ease access to the ballot box this November, in an array of states where the presidential contest could be competitive or where Republicans are pushing more restrictions on voting.


The forms at issue in Texas were distributed to county officials by Vote.org, a nonpartisan voter registration platform that allows citizens to fill out and sign an application by uploading a photographic image of their signature. The website later faxed and mailed the electronically signed applications to county election officials, who were told five days before the deadline to discard them.

The so-called "wet signature rule" violates federal voting rights protections by "selectively targeting and burdening private organizations' efforts to increase voter turnout and imposing an arbitrary barrier to registration," the lawsuit argues.

The rule is arbitrary, according to the plaintiffs, because the state accepts electronic signatures on other official documents, including voter registration forms submitted through the Texas Department of Public Safety.

Texas is one of 13 states that doesn't provide access to online voter registration.

The filing is the third voting rights lawsuit filed against Texas in the past four months by attorneys for the Texas Democratic Party, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

In October, the coalition sued the state over a new law that effectively ended the use of mobile voting sites during early voting. A month later, the group filed a second lawsuit targeting a long-standing law that required the name of candidates who belonged to the same political party as the governor to be listed first on general election ballots.

Perkins Coie, the law firm representing the plaintiffs in the latest case, has filed 14 voting rights lawsuits in a dozen states over the past three months as part of a nationwide strategy to increase voter turnout this fall.



Read More

Independent Voters Just Got Power in Nevada – if the Governor Lets It Happen

"On Las Vegas Boulevard" sign.

Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash. Unplash+ license obtained by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths.

Independent Voters Just Got Power in Nevada – if the Governor Lets It Happen

CARSON CITY, NEV. - A surprise last-minute bill to open primary elections to Nevada’s largest voting bloc, registered unaffiliated voters, moved quickly through the state legislature and was approved by a majority of lawmakers on the last day of the legislative session Monday.

The bill, AB597, allows voters not registered with a political party to pick between a Republican and Democratic primary ballot in future election cycles. It does not apply to the state’s presidential preference elections, which would remain closed to registered party members.

Keep ReadingShow less
Voter registration

In April 2025, the SAVE Act has been reintroduced in the 119th Congress and passed the House, with a much stronger chance of becoming law given the current political landscape.

SDI Productions

The SAVE Act: Addressing a Non-Existent Problem at the Cost of Voter Access?

In July 2024, I wrote about the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act when it was first introduced in Congress. And Sarah and I discussed it in an episode of Beyond the Bill Number which you can still listen to. Now, in April 2025, the SAVE Act has been reintroduced in the 119th Congress and passed the House, with a much stronger chance of becoming law given the current political landscape. It's time to revisit this legislation and examine its implications for American voters.

Read the IssueVoter analysis of the bill here for further insight and commentary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Independent Voters Gain Ground As New Mexico Opens Primaries
person in blue denim jeans and white sneakers standing on gray concrete floor
Photo by Phil Scroggs on Unsplash

Independent Voters Gain Ground As New Mexico Opens Primaries

With the stroke of a pen, New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham enfranchised almost 350,000 independent voters recently by signing a bill for open primaries. Just a few years ago, bills to open the primaries were languishing in the state legislature, as they have historically across the country. But as more and more voters leave both parties and declare their independence, the political system is buckling. And as independents begin to organize and speak out, it’s going to continue to buckle in their direction.

In 2004, there were 120,000 independent voters in New Mexico. A little over 10 years later, when the first open primary bill was introduced, that number had more than doubled. That bill never even got a hearing. But today the number of independents in New Mexico and across the country is too big to ignore. Independents are the largest group of voters in ten states and the second-largest in most others. That’s putting tremendous pressure on a system that wasn’t designed with them in mind.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Voter Here" sign outside of a polling location.

"Voter Here" sign outside of a polling location.

Getty Images, Grace Cary

Stopping the Descent Toward Banana Republic Elections

President Trump’s election-related executive order begins by pointing out practices in Canada, Sweden, Brazil, and elsewhere that outperform the U.S. But it is Trump’s order itself that really demonstrates how far we’ve fallen behind. In none of the countries mentioned, or any other major democracy in the world, would the head of government change election rules by decree, as Trump has tried to do.

Trump is the leader of a political party that will fight for control of Congress in 2026, an election sure to be close, and important to his presidency. The leader of one side in such a competition has no business unilaterally changing its rules—that’s why executive decrees changing elections only happen in tinpot dictatorships, not democracies.

Keep ReadingShow less