Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

GOP vows to spend as much as Democrats on voting rights lawsuits

RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel

The Republican National Committee, headed by chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel, announced Thursday that it was launching an effort to counter voting rights lawsuits filed in key swing states by Democrats.

Scott Olson/Getty Images

The presidential race, the battle for dominance in Congress and contests for control of statehouses across the country will ultimately be determined in the ballot box. But a battle joined this week in another arena, the courtroom, could have a major impact on those results.

The Republican National Committee and President Trump's re-election campaign announced Thursday they will be spending at least $10 million attempting to repel a series of voting rights lawsuits the Democrats have filed in battleground states from coast to coast.

The vow suggests a pitched dollar-for-dollar legal battle that could shape the turnout, and thereby the outcome, in dozens of contests. A month ago the Democrats said they would spend at least $10 million pressing their allegations that all manner of election laws in purple states are unconstitutional or violate federal law.


The Democrats are "trying to rig the game with frivolous lawsuits," Ronna Romney McDaniel, chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, declared in announcing the counterattack. "These actions are dangerous, and we will not stand idly by while Democrats try to sue their way to victory in 2020."

The actions she is referring to are the nearly two dozen lawsuits filed in a dozen states by lawyers representing the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, state Democratic parties and other party-affiliated groups.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

An additional 12 to 16 lawsuits are expected to be filed by Democrats before Election Day, spending tens of millions of dollars more.

The most recent suit, filed last month in Minnesota, seeks to overturn a limit on the amount of help one person may give to others in casting their ballots. In 2016 Trump came within 2 percentage points of becoming the first GOP nominee to win the state since 1972.

Minnesota is also one of several states where Democrats have sued to overturn laws that dictate the order of candidates on the ballot. In Minnesota, the candidates are listed in reverse order of the previous election, which would place GOP names first on this November's ballot.

Democrats have already earned a handful of wins including in Florida, the nation's most populous purple state, where the federal court struck down the state law giving preferential ballot placement to the same party as the governor, who has been a Republican since 1999.

Another victory came in South Carolina where officials agreed last month to drop a requirement that complete Social Security numbers be provided on voter registration forms.

Several lawsuits have targeted voter ID laws that they argue discriminate against students and minority voters.

The first legal action by the GOP came this week in Michigan, where the RNC and the state Republican Party have been allowed to intervene in a lawsuit filed by the Democratic-aligned super PAC Priorities USA. The suit challenges state laws that prohibit political organizers from helping voters submit absentee ballot applications and bar groups from hiring people to transport voters to the polls.

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less