Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

GOP vows to spend as much as Democrats on voting rights lawsuits

RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel

The Republican National Committee, headed by chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel, announced Thursday that it was launching an effort to counter voting rights lawsuits filed in key swing states by Democrats.

Scott Olson/Getty Images

The presidential race, the battle for dominance in Congress and contests for control of statehouses across the country will ultimately be determined in the ballot box. But a battle joined this week in another arena, the courtroom, could have a major impact on those results.

The Republican National Committee and President Trump's re-election campaign announced Thursday they will be spending at least $10 million attempting to repel a series of voting rights lawsuits the Democrats have filed in battleground states from coast to coast.

The vow suggests a pitched dollar-for-dollar legal battle that could shape the turnout, and thereby the outcome, in dozens of contests. A month ago the Democrats said they would spend at least $10 million pressing their allegations that all manner of election laws in purple states are unconstitutional or violate federal law.


The Democrats are "trying to rig the game with frivolous lawsuits," Ronna Romney McDaniel, chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, declared in announcing the counterattack. "These actions are dangerous, and we will not stand idly by while Democrats try to sue their way to victory in 2020."

The actions she is referring to are the nearly two dozen lawsuits filed in a dozen states by lawyers representing the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, state Democratic parties and other party-affiliated groups.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

An additional 12 to 16 lawsuits are expected to be filed by Democrats before Election Day, spending tens of millions of dollars more.

The most recent suit, filed last month in Minnesota, seeks to overturn a limit on the amount of help one person may give to others in casting their ballots. In 2016 Trump came within 2 percentage points of becoming the first GOP nominee to win the state since 1972.

Minnesota is also one of several states where Democrats have sued to overturn laws that dictate the order of candidates on the ballot. In Minnesota, the candidates are listed in reverse order of the previous election, which would place GOP names first on this November's ballot.

Democrats have already earned a handful of wins including in Florida, the nation's most populous purple state, where the federal court struck down the state law giving preferential ballot placement to the same party as the governor, who has been a Republican since 1999.

Another victory came in South Carolina where officials agreed last month to drop a requirement that complete Social Security numbers be provided on voter registration forms.

Several lawsuits have targeted voter ID laws that they argue discriminate against students and minority voters.

The first legal action by the GOP came this week in Michigan, where the RNC and the state Republican Party have been allowed to intervene in a lawsuit filed by the Democratic-aligned super PAC Priorities USA. The suit challenges state laws that prohibit political organizers from helping voters submit absentee ballot applications and bar groups from hiring people to transport voters to the polls.

Read More

A better direction for democracy reform

Denver election judge Eric Cobb carefully looks over ballots as counting continued on Nov. 6. Voters in Colorado rejected a ranked choice voting and open primaries measure.

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

A better direction for democracy reform

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

This is the conclusion of a two-part, post-election series addressing the questions of what happened, why, what does it mean and what did we learn? Read part one.

I think there is a better direction for reform than the ranked choice voting and open primary proposals that were defeated on Election Day: combining fusion voting for single-winner elections with party-list proportional representation for multi-winner elections. This straightforward solution addresses the core problems voters care about: lack of choices, gerrymandering, lack of competition, etc., with a single transformative sweep.

Keep ReadingShow less
To-party doom loop
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America

Let’s make sense of the election results

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author of "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

Well, here are some of my takeaways from Election Day, and some other thoughts.

1. The two-party doom loop keeps getting doomier and loopier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting in Denver

A proposal to institute ranked choice voting in Colorado was rejected by voters.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Despite setbacks, ranked choice voting will continue to grow

Mantell is director of communications for FairVote.

More than 3 million people across the nation voted for better elections through ranked choice voting on Election Day, as of current returns. Ranked choice voting is poised to win majority support in all five cities where it was on the ballot, most notably with an overwhelming win in Washington, D.C. – 73 percent to 27 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Electoral College map

It's possible Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could each get 269 electoral votes this year.

Electoral College rules are a problem. A worst-case tie may be ahead.

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization. Keyssar is a Matthew W. Stirling Jr. professor of history and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His work focuses on voting rights, electoral and political institutions, and the evolution of democracies.

It’s the worst-case presidential election scenario — a 269–269 tie in the Electoral College. In our hyper-competitive political era, such a scenario, though still unlikely, is becoming increasingly plausible, and we need to grapple with its implications.

Recent swing-state polling suggests a slight advantage for Kamala Harris in the Rust Belt, while Donald Trump leads in the Sun Belt. If the final results mirror these trends, Harris wins with 270 electoral votes. But should Trump take the single elector from Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district — won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2016 — then both candidates would be deadlocked at 269.

Keep ReadingShow less