Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

1.6 million votes 'wasted' on Democratic also-rans so far. Would RCV help?

Early voting

Many California voters cast their ballots in advance of the Super Tuesday primary on March 3. Hundreds of thousands of those ballots supported candidates who withdrawn by primary day.

Mario Tama/Getty Imagges

The growth in early voting has exploded in recent years with more opportunities to cast ballots in person or by mail, and thereby avoid lines on Election Day.

But a downside to the convenience has been exposed by this year's Democratic presidential contest, where an ocean of votes have been cast for candidates who dropped out by the time primary day arrived.

FairVote, a nonpartisan group that champions ranked-choice voting, is highlighting these "wasted" or "lost" votes — saying most of them would not really be squandered if the alternative election method was embraced, allowing Democrats to signal support for several candidates including the two who remain viable.


The group says that heading into Tuesday's primaries about 1.6 million people had cast early ballots for candidates who had withdrawn. (Unite America's Tyler Fisher highlighted similar data in an opinion piece last week.)

A total of 36 million people voted early during the 2018 midterm election, an increase of one-third from 2014. Nearly one of every three votes was cast in advance.

This year, 4 million people in the Super Tuesday states were early voters, including thousands who voted for Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar — who withdrew in the days before 14 states held primaries on March 3. Just in California, the nominating contests's biggest delegate trove, Buttigieg received nearly 250,000 votes and Klobuchar nearly 125,000.

Under RCV, voters list candidates in order of preference, with the ballots listing the also-rans as No. 1 choice getting redistributed until only the top finishers remain — in the case of the Democrats, generally someone with 15 percent support statewide or in a congressional district. So voters who preferred the Minnesota senator or former mayor of South Bend, Ind., would have had a chance to get credit for naming Sen. Bernie Sanders of former Vice President Joe Biden as second or even third choices.

FairVote officials say the novel coronavirus outbreak is making it even more likely that people will take the opportunity to vote early. In Washington state, they said, this contributed to a fourth of the votes being cast for candidates who had withdrawn before the March 10 primary. Of those, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who got out five days before the polls closed, received nearly 140,000 votes.

"Many voters face an unfair choice: the ballot box or the abyss," said Rob Richie, president of FairVote, which has been tracking what it has christened wasted votes in an effort to highlight the virtues of RCV. "Americans should be given the opportunity to vote for the candidates they believe should be president, not just the ones they believe will stay in the race."

A version of ranked-choice voting will be used for the first time this year in the Democratic contests in Wyoming, Alaska and Hawaii on April 4 — and in the Kansas primary a month later.


Read More

With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
People voting at voting booths.

A little-known interstate compact could change how the U.S. elects presidents by 2028, replacing the Electoral College with the national popular vote.

Getty Images, VIEW press

The Quiet Campaign That Could Rewrite the 2028 Election

Most Americans are unaware, but a quiet campaign in states across the country is moving toward one of the biggest changes in presidential elections since the nation was founded.

A movement called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is happening mostly out of public view and could soon change how the United States picks its president, possibly as early as 2028.

Keep ReadingShow less