Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

1.6 million votes 'wasted' on Democratic also-rans so far. Would RCV help?

Early voting

Many California voters cast their ballots in advance of the Super Tuesday primary on March 3. Hundreds of thousands of those ballots supported candidates who withdrawn by primary day.

Mario Tama/Getty Imagges

The growth in early voting has exploded in recent years with more opportunities to cast ballots in person or by mail, and thereby avoid lines on Election Day.

But a downside to the convenience has been exposed by this year's Democratic presidential contest, where an ocean of votes have been cast for candidates who dropped out by the time primary day arrived.

FairVote, a nonpartisan group that champions ranked-choice voting, is highlighting these "wasted" or "lost" votes — saying most of them would not really be squandered if the alternative election method was embraced, allowing Democrats to signal support for several candidates including the two who remain viable.


The group says that heading into Tuesday's primaries about 1.6 million people had cast early ballots for candidates who had withdrawn. (Unite America's Tyler Fisher highlighted similar data in an opinion piece last week.)

A total of 36 million people voted early during the 2018 midterm election, an increase of one-third from 2014. Nearly one of every three votes was cast in advance.

This year, 4 million people in the Super Tuesday states were early voters, including thousands who voted for Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar — who withdrew in the days before 14 states held primaries on March 3. Just in California, the nominating contests's biggest delegate trove, Buttigieg received nearly 250,000 votes and Klobuchar nearly 125,000.

Under RCV, voters list candidates in order of preference, with the ballots listing the also-rans as No. 1 choice getting redistributed until only the top finishers remain — in the case of the Democrats, generally someone with 15 percent support statewide or in a congressional district. So voters who preferred the Minnesota senator or former mayor of South Bend, Ind., would have had a chance to get credit for naming Sen. Bernie Sanders of former Vice President Joe Biden as second or even third choices.

FairVote officials say the novel coronavirus outbreak is making it even more likely that people will take the opportunity to vote early. In Washington state, they said, this contributed to a fourth of the votes being cast for candidates who had withdrawn before the March 10 primary. Of those, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who got out five days before the polls closed, received nearly 140,000 votes.

"Many voters face an unfair choice: the ballot box or the abyss," said Rob Richie, president of FairVote, which has been tracking what it has christened wasted votes in an effort to highlight the virtues of RCV. "Americans should be given the opportunity to vote for the candidates they believe should be president, not just the ones they believe will stay in the race."

A version of ranked-choice voting will be used for the first time this year in the Democratic contests in Wyoming, Alaska and Hawaii on April 4 — and in the Kansas primary a month later.


Read More

California Voters Don’t Like Either Party. Good Thing the Primary Doesn’t Belong to The Parties.

California voters increasingly distrust both major parties. Here's why the state's Top Two primary gives independent voters more power to shape elections.

Image: Duncan Shelby on Alamy.

California Voters Don’t Like Either Party. Good Thing the Primary Doesn’t Belong to The Parties.

SAN DIEGO, Calif. - California voters have already received ballots for the June 2 primary, and the message they have going into these elections may not be what the political class wants to hear: They are not thrilled with either major party.

A recent analysis from the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) found that majorities of likely voters have unfavorable views of both parties—61% unfavorable toward the Democratic Party and 70% unfavorable toward the Republican Party.

Keep ReadingShow less
How the Voting Rights Act Reshaped Texas’ Electoral Maps

President Lyndon B. Johnson, Martin Luther King Jr., Clarence Mitchell Jr., Patricia Roberts Harris, and other guests at the signing of the Voting Rights Act on August 6, 1965.

Yoichi Okamoto - Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum

How the Voting Rights Act Reshaped Texas’ Electoral Maps

In 2002, U.S. Rep. Henry Bonilla, a Republican, nearly lost his South Texas seat to Democrat Henry Cuellar. So when the GOP used its newfound majority in the state Legislature to redraw the voting maps the next year, they sawed through Cuellar’s hometown of Laredo and scattered Latino voters, who tended to vote Democratic, into other districts.

Latino advocacy groups sued under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the cornerstone provision of the law that prevents government bodies from diluting the voting power of specific groups. The Supreme Court found Texas lawmakers had taken away Latino voting power “because they were about to exercise it.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A group of people wait in line to get their ballots to vote in the election.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could reshape presidential elections as Midwest states debate Electoral College reform, political polarization, and the future of winner-take-all voting in America.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

700+ Proposed Amendments Failed, Midwest Voters Can Succeed

The Midwest served as the vanguard and ideological heartland of the Progressive Era, acting as a crucial laboratory for political, social, and economic reforms that later adopted national significance. Midwestern states (the cradle of the movement) pioneered anti-monopoly efforts, democratic, and social improvements.

After 770+ failed proposed U.S. Constitutional Amendments (the most on record for one issue) to remedy the factionalism (21st century polarization) feared by the Framers of the U.S. Constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
“We Can’t Afford It” Is Never an Acceptable Excuse To Deny Independents a Vote

DC voting rights advocate Lisa D.T. Rice criticized the DC City Council for failing to fund Initiative 83’s semi-open primary system, leaving 85,000 independent voters unable to participate in taxpayer-funded primaries despite overwhelming voter approval in 2024.

Photo by Getty Images on Unsplash.

“We Can’t Afford It” Is Never an Acceptable Excuse To Deny Independents a Vote

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Lisa D.T. Rice spoke before the DC City Council during a Budget Oversight Hearing on May 1 to talk about Initiative 83, the semi-open primary and ranked choice voting measure she proposed that was approved by 73% of voters in 2024.

- YouTube youtu.be

Keep ReadingShow less