Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s Playbook to Loot the American Commons

Opinion

A scenic landscape of ​Yosemite National Park

Yosemite National Park.

Getty Images, Kenny McCartney

While Trump declares himself ruler of Venezuela, sells off their oil to his megadonors, and threatens Greenland ostensibly for resource extraction, it might be easy to miss his plot to pillage precious natural wonders here at home. But make no mistake–even America’s national parks are in peril.

National parks promote the environment, exercise, education, family bonding, and they transcend our differences—John Muir once said, "One touch of nature makes the whole world kin." Thanks to Teddy Roosevelt, who championed these treasures with the Antiquities Act, national parks are (supposed to be) federally protected areas. To the Trump administration, however, these federal protections are an inconvenient roadblock to liquidating and plundering our public lands. Now, they are draining resources and morale from the parks, which may be a deliberate effort to degrade America’s best idea.


First and foremost, Trump is responsible for a dramatic slashing of staffing. Over the past year, the administration fired 4,000 dedicated professionals, or a quarter of its workforce. These rangers once maintained trails, educated visitors, and protected endangered species. Their absence is already being felt across the park system, with longer wait times, fewer services, and less capacity to address environmental threats. Adding insult to injury, the administration has implemented a new performance review system that seems designed to demoralize the remaining staff and make further layoffs easier. By artificially limiting the number of top marks given in evaluations, this policy violates federal regulations and sets the stage for potential "reduction in force" layoffs. It's a move that threatens to crush the spirit of those who have dedicated their careers to preserving our natural heritage, and who are already spread thin, filling the holes left by the mass firings.

In a brazen attempt to rewrite history and downplay environmental concerns, Trump officials have also ordered the removal of signs and displays related to climate change, conservation efforts, and the mistreatment of Native Americans and slaves. This gaslighting and whitewashing of our parks' educational materials flies in the face of the National Park Service's mission to provide accurate information to visitors. Even the simple act of visiting a park has become more complicated and exclusionary. New policies require staff to question visitors about their residency status, leading to longer wait times and potential discrimination. For non-U.S. residents, steep surcharges have been implemented, making our national parks less accessible to international visitors and contradicting the idea that these are spaces for all to enjoy.

The cumulative effect of these changes is clear: a diminished experience for visitors, demoralized staff, and parks that are less able to fulfill their crucial role in conservation and education. This systematic undermining of our national parks system feels suspiciously like a precursor to more drastic measures.

If everyone who visited Yosemite and Yellowstone had a bad time, it would be easier to justify further budget cuts or further exploitation and extraction. This means eliminating restrictions on mining, drilling, and logging, to the detriment of the wildlife habitats. It also means selling off public lands to the highest bidder, who may harvest the parks for resources (drill, baby, drill?). Trump has already signaled his goal by hand-picking Steve Pearce–a multi-millionaire who made his fortune in oil and gas, known as Sell-Off Steve by conservation groups as a result of his ongoing efforts to privatize public lands–to run the Bureau of Land Management, overseeing 245 million acres of public land. These tactics resemble the Big Short–a significant investment strategy where an investor bets that the price of an asset, such as a stock, will decline–and Trump is insider trading with himself. Don’t fall for it.

Luckily, in January, the Senate introduced a three-bill appropriations package that rejected what National Parks Conservation Association President and CEO Theresa Pierno referred to as “the Trump administration’s reckless $1 billion funding cut that would have devastated our parks” (this proposed cut came from the same president who managed to find $74.85 billion in the couch cushions to appropriate to paramilitary thugs, more than ICE spent in the last eight years combined). Still, Congress must do much more to prevent national parks from getting sold off in the future, which could mean, at a minimum, ensuring they remain federal lands.

Our national parks are scenic vistas, living classrooms, biodiversity hotspots, and sources of national pride. By preserving nature for future generations, we acknowledge that some places are too precious to be developed or exploited. As citizens, we must contact our representatives, ask them to oppose Pearce’s nomination, fully fund and staff parks, and push back against policies that threaten their integrity. We should also keep visiting our parks, share our positive experiences, and help maintain these spaces when possible. There is no Lorax to fight for our home. Only YOU can prevent the theft of our public lands.

Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.


Read More

A drone view of dry land with trees around and a lake near the center.

After the Central Oregon Irrigation District delivered water to landowners near Redmond, Oregon, in July 2025, what’s left pooled in a silty pond where it eventually drained away or evaporated. The district said it has 24 ponds that catch water at the ends of its system.

Brandon Swanson/OPB

An Oregon Law Lets One Wealthy Region Turn the Desert Green. When Drought Hits, Farmers Pay the Price.

Chris Casad awakens each day before dawn on the Central Oregon property he bought nine years ago, the farm where he once grew tons of potatoes before water shortages forced him to fallow fields and take a job feeding someone else’s cattle on someone else’s land.

At 38, he’s got tractors older than he is. His two kids are under 5. His wife, Cate, has two jobs. They’re staring down a pile of debt from their 85 acres and its unending supply of things in the process of breaking.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latino Workers Need Stronger OSHA Protections

healthcare worker

Latino Workers Need Stronger OSHA Protections

Across California and the U.S., thousands of employees working in sterilization facilities, medical device distribution centers, and other industrial environments are exposed to a chemical that poses significant long-term health risks. Ethylene oxide (EtO) is used to sterilize nearly half of the medical devices in healthcare, making it indispensable. Yet the mounting evidence of its danger to those who handle it can no longer be dismissed.

What makes this especially alarming is that the risk does not stop at the facility fence. In California, emissions from EtO sterilization plants drift into surrounding neighborhoods, reaching schools, childcare centers, and homes. Many of these facilities are located near lower-income communities and communities of color, and as a result, Latino workers and families are often among those most heavily exposed. For these communities, this is not an abstract policy debate. It is a matter of environmental justice, public health, and the basic right to a safe workplace and a safe neighborhood.

Keep ReadingShow less
Plumes of smoke rise over the oil depot tanks hit by joint Israel-U.S.

Plumes of smoke rise over the oil depot tanks hit by joint Israel-U.S. over night in a station north west of the capital on March 8, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28.

Kaveh Kazemi / Getty Images

Russia is Winning the War in Iran. Earth is Losing

As the United States falls behind in the great power competition, climate change is providing economic and military advantages to our geopolitical rivals and destabilizing the world. We are outgunned and outmanned, and global warming will only exacerbate the issue. The war in Iran is now accelerating climate change to a level that will have devastating consequences on the human race and our planet, while ultimately benefiting our adversaries. As President Trump puts off making a deal with Iran, Russia, especially, is in a position to reap the benefits and gain a tactical edge. The Department of Defense (DOD) used to talk a bit about these environmental threats, but most Americans do not understand how dire the situation is. We should be yelling.

The increasing volatility of climate change pushes our world more rapidly towards global conflict every day. Heat domes, massive fires, and lethal floods all over the world signal “mayday.” The DOD used to call climate change a national security priority, “integrating climate considerations into policies, strategies and partner engagements.” Former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin used to say that “no nation can find lasting security without addressing the climate crisis,” one of the only threats that “truly deserve[s] to be called existential.” Natural resources have been a frequent source of armed conflicts for millennia; future conflict will only intensify as these resources are reduced at a rapidly increasing rate.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Best Utility Is a Public Utility
black and white electric meter
Photo by Jon Moore on Unsplash

The Best Utility Is a Public Utility

Utilities are boring until the power goes out. US Census data shows that one in three households struggles to pay their energy bills, resulting in millions of electricity shut-offs each year. Poor management by electric companies leads to more outages and wildfires. At the same time, many of us feel that we have little say in energy decisions that affect us. In Utah, the recent approval of a data center twice the size of Manhattan has left residents struggling with the real cost of growing electricity demand—on the environment and on our wallets.

Often overlooked in the conversation about cost is the fact that most of our utility sector is run for profit. There is a better way. I’m a public power organizer in New York’s Hudson Valley, and people like me from St. Petersburg, Florida, to Ann Arbor, Michigan, are fighting to take control of our investor-owned utilities and turn them public. Making electricity not-for-profit and community-owned means lower bills for customers and more say in our shared resources.

Keep ReadingShow less