Skip to content

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your take: What would you prioritize to reverse divisiveness and increase social cohesion?

Your take: What would you prioritize to reverse divisiveness and increase social cohesion?
Orbon Alija/Getty Images

Our question: What three things would you prioritize to reverse divisiveness and alienation trends and increase social cohesion in the United States?

This question resonated with our readers based on the number of responses we received.

Not surprisingly the focus was as different as we are as Americans. Some focused on how the government works and how to improve elections. Some focused on how citizens can be better informed (the Fairness Doctrine was cited by many) and become involved. And others offered suggestions on how to create better understanding that gives us the ability to come together as a nation. Yet more pointed to civics education for students and adults. Here are a few of the many responses we received, and some have been edited for length.

As a high school student, I believe that the social cohesion of tomorrow starts with the youth of today. Keeping this perspective in mind, here are my three main points: 1. Civics education is vital to keeping our nation together. I am a firm believer that our country lacks balanced, equitable civics education. I actually wrote a speech about this subject recently. 2. Beyond public schools, we need to prioritize extracurricular activities that encourage healthy public speaking habits, like a speech, debate and Constitution team. 3. Kids must get involved in local and regional initiatives to fight for the opportunity to talk to people of differing opinions. From my personal experience, I have not been encouraged by many teachers to reach out to people I disagree with, and that's something we need to fight for. Robert Hamblin

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

1. Shared experiences among diverse groups. This is certainly not a new concept, but I think the conversation around this is often shallow. Shared experiences — such as learning a new hobby — among diverse groups of people are essential to social cohesion. However, a few challenges arise; namely that cities are often so segregated that it can be a challenge to actually bring diverse people together.

2. Spaces to gather. The second thing that is then needed are welcoming spaces such as libraries, parks, community centers and other places — that are high-quality, convenient and accessible venues. These spaces must extend an invite to all — from the most affluent to the most vulnerable, and to people from across the spectrum of political ideologies. In light of the pandemic, we also recognize that digital spaces are also becoming increasingly important.

3. Amplifying stories (people), initiatives and ideologies that embrace understanding others, bridging & belonging, and civic health. Shamichael Hallman

Three things that I would prioritize are:

1.Establishing a basic needs agenda in our country.

2.Teaching courses in creolization theory.

3.And teaching people how to develop a “Founder’s mentality” when looking at this nation’s development.

Pedro Silva

I’d love to think of ways to get people out of their homes/off their screens and working on projects in the community together for a common good.

Recently I went to my mother’s house and my aunt was there. She and I are about as far apart as two people can be on politics and she tends to be a bit tone deaf so it’s hard to just “put politics aside” or “agree to disagree.” But my mother had a 1,000-piece jigsaw puzzle out and we all worked together on it and it was the most I have peacefully engaged with her in a while. I can’t stop reflecting on it.

A jigsaw puzzle is a small thing, but could we replicate this with projects like building a garden, cleaning up a park, habitat for humanity-style building, etc.? It would be a double win for the community if we could fix a concrete problem in our towns and also build cohesion around it.

Mary K. Flynn

I love the question as social cohesion is fresh on my mind after reading Robert Putnam’s 2001 article on social capital. I think these steps would help:

  • Focusing on what we aspire towards — the shared vision and shared values.
  • Integrating Social Trust building dialogues into existing structures rather than relying on people to join new groups.
  • Making explicit our intentions to use these dialogues and techniques because we believe we can achieve this vision together.

David M Green

First priority: Make news consumption better. I get the feeling my own news consumption does not tell me what I need to know in order to be an effective member of society, and I wonder what I'm missing. And most other people's news consumption doesn't tell them what they need to know either. Some schools are now teaching students to solve real-world problems as part of their curriculum; I wonder whether we also need to learn problem-solving techniques from our news.

Second priority: Make voting systems better. Maybe this means less partisan. I'm curious about systems like final-five voting.

Third priority: Ask a wide variety of people what they want us to prioritize. Even ask this question to people who are unwilling to participate in a dialogue (which I'm guessing is most people) by doing surveys of the general public.

Cobie Delespinasse

1. Breaking up media monopolies/ bring back the Fairness Doctrine.

2. Campaign finance reform.

3. Addressing income inequality with a focus on rural communities.

George Balella

There is one thing I would do three times over and that is continue to find ways to get the word out about all the good work that’s happening across the country. I know so many people that are talking about leaving the U.S. because they can’t stand it. And I want people to stay and fight. So maybe the second thing is to figure out how to get people in the streets to say they can’t deal with inaction on voting rights. Where is the outrage?

Victoria Hattersly

The public is increasingly alarmed about the country’s divisions and the press in demonstrating greater interest in stories of bridging divides. Therefore, I’d prioritize these things, all aimed at organizations within the movement:

1.Step up PR work to bring visibility to the movement and successes within it to the press, both local and national.

2.Build programming around “strange bedfellows” who are engaging with each other in a positive, constructive way.

3.Support work to rein in gerrymandering.

Bruce Bond

There is only one thing I would prioritize to reverse the trends of social divisiveness and alienation. I work in the intersection of religious freedom and LGBT concerns with people with strong convictions on every “side” — and yet, every day I find reason to be hopeful for our country and for all of us as human beings. My one recommendation for all of us:

Make a friend who is very different from you.

Marian Edmonds-Allen

The three strategies below, especially if pursued simultaneously, would help reverse debilitating polarization and promote social cohesion.

1. Support solutions and possibilities. Create a new independent government agency, the National Endowment for Resilience and Cohesion, and/or a public private partnership with a similar mission and substantial resources that would support a range of activities, including 1) funding national, state and local efforts to tackle polarization, build capacity around solutions-oriented processes and policies (like hiring chief cohesion officers in government, business and Hollywood), and provide technical assistance, training, tools and curricula incorporating evidence-based research on how best to depolarize and promote cohesion; 2) funding creative projects to generate content that imagines and makes tangible what a successful multiracial pluralistic America would look and feel like; and 3) funding or incentivizing the development of new apps and games that would reward prosocial behaviors.

2. Change behavioral norms and practices. Launch a high profile national campaign targeting government, media, entertainment, business, educational institutions and civil society to do their part to strengthen our democracy and repair our frayed civil fabric. Participants would pledge to adhere to a new code of conduct that reduces polarization and othering and emphasizes our shared fates and common aspirations (like a LEED certification equivalent for social cohesion). While there are smaller efforts of this type underway now, none are gaining the needed traction. The goal would be to synergize them, get huge uptake with an influencer strategy and sign ons from major players in all the key sectors, and generate pressure to take the pledge.

3. Make service cool and accessible for all ages. Scale and develop new, more flexible types of national and community service opportunities that would engage people across the age spectrum, from elementary school students to the elderly. Infuse them with a bridging rather than a charity mindset. Create an accompanying curriculum that fosters curiosity and empathy, emphasizes human dignity, and encourages deep listening across differences of all kinds, including identity, ideology and geography. Prioritize placements that offer participants insight, preferably gained by living in a new environment, into experiences that differ from their own that help overcome segregation, othering and racism.

Ideally, the combination of government and private sector resources and engagement, meaningful experiences across differences happening at scale all over the country, and an impactful public campaign would create enough “surround sound” to jolt Americans into a new way of being and thinking, usher in new behavioral norms, create new cohesion incentives that compete with entrenched polarization ones, and reach a positive tipping point for our country. Suzette Brooks Masters

My first priority for those wishing to defend and strengthen democracy would be an effort to promote much broader public awareness of the importance of protecting the rights and interests of those on the losing side of democratic elections. Democracy cannot function as a winner-take-all system in which the winners are able to force their opponents to publicly embrace the winners' beliefs. It can also not be a political spoils system in which winners unfairly redistribute wealth and status toward their political supporters. If citizens (as is too often now the case) believe that elections are battles that they absolutely, positively can't afford to lose, then democracy is doomed. All citizens in a democracy must be assured that, regardless of an election's outcome or a judicial decision, they will continue to have a secure and valued place in society.

This raises a second priority, the cultivation of a much more diverse diversity — one that spans, rather than stops, at the political divide. The defense of diversity must go beyond the coalition building imperative behind "big tent" politics and embrace the principles of mutual respect, tolerance, and individual freedom that allow people from different political coalitions with very different, deeply held belief systems to peacefully live together in mutually supportive ways.

Finally, I would encourage us all to do much more to resist what I call bad-faith actors — those who, for a variety of reasons, deliberately use sophisticated and deceptive tactics to inflame our hyper-polarized politics and, thereby, advance their narrow, selfish interests. Such actors include, for example, inflammatory media, foreign provocateurs, and hate-mongering political figures. We can't let them lure us into self-righteous information bubbles that prevent us from seeing the humanity of our fellow citizens or the things we are doing that contribute to our society's deep divisions. Guy Burgess

Read More

Rep. Gus Bilirakis and Rep. Ayanna Pressley

Rep. Gus Bilirakis and Rep. Ayanna Pressley won the Congressional Management Foundation's Democracy Award for Constituent Accountability and Accessibility.

Official portraits

Some leaders don’t want to be held accountable. These two expect it.

Fitch is president and CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation and a former congressional staffer.

There is probably no more important concept in the compact between elected officials and those who elect them than accountability. One of the founding principles of American democracy is that members of Congress are ultimately accountable to their constituents, both politically and morally. Most members of Congress get this, but how they demonstrate and implement that concept varies. The two winners of the Congressional Management Foundation’s Democracy Award for Constituent Accountability and Accessibility clearly understand and excel at this concept.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman speaking at a microphone

Rep. Lucy McBath is the first lawmaker from Georgia to win a Democracy Awarrd.

Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Surprise: Some great public servants are actually members of Congress

Fitch is the president and CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation and a former congressional staffer.

TheCongressional Management Foundation today announced the winners of the seventh annual Democracy Awards, CMF’s program recognizing non-legislative achievement and performance in congressional offices and by members of Congress. Two members of Congress, one Democrat and one Republican, are recognized in four categories related to their work in Congress.

Americans usually only hear about Congress when something goes wrong. The Democracy Awards shines a light on Congress when it does something right. These members of Congress and their staff deserve recognition for their work to improve accountability in government, modernize their work environments and serve their constituents.

Keep ReadingShow less

Can George Washington inspire Biden to greatness?

Clancy is co-founder of Citizen Connect and board member of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund. Citizen Connect is an initiative of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, which also operates The Fulcrum.

King George III reputedly said George Washington was the greatest man in the world for voluntarily relinquishing power. The indisputable fact is that Washington’s action remains remarkable in human history. And he actually did it at least two times.

On Dec. 23, 1783, Washington resigned his commission as commander of the Continental Army and returned to Mount Vernon. He did it again when he declined to run for a third term as president by publishing his Farewell Address on Sept. 19, 1796. In June 1799 Washington was yet again urged to run for president and declined.

His reasoning on each occasion was a complex mix of the personal and political, but the bedrock was an unwavering commitment to put the good of the nation above personal gain and the factions that would ultimately become our toxic party system.

Keep ReadingShow less
Joe Biden at the debate

After his disastrous peformance at the debate, President Biden needs to exit the race, writes Breslin.

Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images

Getting into the highest offices is hard. Getting out is harder.

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.”

This is the latest in “A Republic, if we can keep it,” a series to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year. By highlighting components, principles and stories of the Constitution, Breslin hopes to remind us that the American political experiment remains, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, the “most interesting in the world.”

Getting into America’s highest political offices is hard. Getting out is harder.

President Joe Biden’s disastrous debate performance has intensified calls for him to step aside. Not even 24 hours after his poor showing, The New York Times took the extraordinary and unprecedented position that the sitting president should immediately pass the torch to a more energetic and electable candidate. “The greatest public service Mr. Biden can now perform,” the editorial board declared, “is to announce that he will not continue to run for re-election.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump on stage at the debate

Donald Trump's emphasis on the power of negative information gave him an advantage at Thursday's debate.

Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images

How harnessing the power of bad helped Trump win the debate

Assari is an associate professor of public health and Internal Medicine at Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science. He is a member of the Scholars Strategy Network.

On Thursday, we witnessed a debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump. What captured most of the audience's attention were Biden's occasional stumbles and Trump's numerous statements inaccuracies. Biden appeared humble and policy-focused, while Trump was loud, assertive and well-spoken.

However, another significant aspect was Trump's rhetoric, which was often filled with threats, fear and loss, especially on topics like immigration and crime. In contrast, Biden's points were primarily centered around policies and statistics aimed at benefiting Americans overall, with a particular focus on the vulnerable.

Keep ReadingShow less