Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Bipartisan talks start in Georgia on expansion of felon voting

Bipartisan talks start in Georgia on expansion of felon voting

Legislators in Georgia may loosen the restrictions on felons seeking to regain voting rights. Currently, Georgia felons may not resume voting unless they have paid off all fines and until their probation or parole is done.

A bipartisan group of state senators has begun reviewing Georgia's rules about voting by convicted felons, with a target of deciding on possible changes in times for next year's legislative session.

The panel was convened last month by Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan, a Republican, with a deadline to make recommendations by year's end.

Currently, Georgia felons may not resume voting unless they have paid off all fines, and until their probation or parole is done. This is the situation in most states, but a move has been underway to loosen the restrictions – especially the one about paying off fines, an economic burden that can keep felons disenfranchised for years after they reenter society.


"There are good people – not necessarily innocent people – in our jails and prisons that plan on doing good things when they get out," GOP state Sen. Randy Robertson, the chairman of the study committee and a former sheriff's deputy, told the Atlanta Journal Constitution. "I'm looking forward to hearing about what a nonviolent felon is and listen to the groups impacted by the issue."

Convictions prevented about 250,000 Georgians from voting in the last presidential election, four out of five of them because they were still on probation or parole, according to the Sentencing Project, an advocacy group that studies racial disparities in sentencing.

Democratic state Sen. Harold Jones, another member of the panel, predicted the likeliest outcome would be reinstating voting rights more quickly – perhaps as soon as after release from prison – for nonviolent felons who have been convicted of crimes such as drug possession and shoplifting.

Georgia is among 22 states where felons lose the franchise for some time after their release from prison, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Felons lose their voting rights only while incarcerated in 14 states.


Read More

An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less
Land of the Free, Home of the Capitalism Didn’t Fail America. America Failed to Moderate Capitalism
Monopoly's mr. monopoly in a graffiti collage
Photo by Artur Ament on Unsplash

Land of the Free, Home of the Capitalism Didn’t Fail America. America Failed to Moderate Capitalism

The signs are everywhere. For many Americans, buying power has improved only modestly despite decades of economic growth. Corporate profits are at an all-time high. We have reached a level of wealth inequality last seen almost a hundred years ago. By many measures, our capitalist economy seems to have failed to deliver broadly shared prosperity.

However, the failure isn’t with the free market as an economic approach. Instead, it’s our failure to regulate and moderate the free market, or more accurately, that we have spent 40 years undermining or removing the regulations of the New Deal that made our economy work for more Americans.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman putting savings in a white piggy bank.

America’s economy now rewards asset ownership over wages. A policy proposal: a $35,000 Birthright Account for every child, and how it could be funded.

Guido Mieth/Getty Images

The American Dream Needs a New Economic Operating System

It is, by now, not an exaggeration to state that the traditional American Dream—work hard, buy a house, raise a family, and retire securely—is failing. It was built for a labor-based economy in which steadily rising wages allowed ordinary families to accumulate wealth. But America has become an asset-based economy, and ownership of those assets is extraordinarily concentrated.

Since the 1980s, the returns from capital have far outpaced the returns from labor. Inflation-adjusted wages for ordinary workers have risen only modestly, while the real value of equities has multiplied many times over. Housing, education, healthcare and childcare costs have soared, employment has become less secure, and defined-benefit pensions have largely disappeared. Even two-income households with respectable jobs often struggle to buy a home, build savings and accumulate enough for retirement.

Keep ReadingShow less