Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Kansas legislator Christina Haswood: Elected to work with everyone

Woman standing in a legislative chamber

Kansas state Rep. Christina Haswood

Goldsmith is the senior communications director for The Future Caucus.

Growing up, Christina Haswood struggled with poverty, relying on public resources for housing, school lunches, and tribal clothing programs. Her upbringing provided a unique advantage in understanding the economic struggles facing many in her generation and disadvantaged constituents within the district she now represents in the Kansas House of Representatives.

Born in Lawrence, Kan., following her parent’s relocation from the Navajo Nation reservation in Arizona, Haswood’s journey is deeply rooted in her community. From her early education to the initial stages of her college career, Haswood’s continuous connection to the district, as well as her heritage, form the bedrock of her commitment to public service.


“When I got tapped to run for office, I had a lot of that community support, where folks have known me and seen me since I was toddler age,” Haswood, a Democrat, said in an interview at the Future Caucus’ 2023 Future Summit. “They see me, you know, go through sports, graduating high school and starting my adult life and higher education. It was really a great experience to have that community support.”

Haswood’s entry into politics was not merely a personal choice but a response to a collective call from her community. Encouraged by former state Rep. Ponka-We Victors and other women in the Native American community, she overcame initial doubt about her age and limited political experience to run for office.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

“What convinced me was that I can bring representation to other Native American and BIPOC [Black, indigenous and people of color] folks in Kansas, that we belong in these spaces, and if I win or lose, I can still bring that little bit of inspiration that once was brought to me,” Haswood said. “That’s when I decided to throw my hat in the ring to run for office.”

With academic accomplishments including an associate degree in community health from Haskell Indian Nations University, a bachelor’s degree in public health from Arizona State University and a master’s degree in public health management from the University of Kansas Medical Center, Haswood brings a wealth of knowledge to her legislative role.

Running for office during the global Covid-19 pandemic, Haswood was compelled to act, witnessing its disproportionate impact on Indigenous populations. Seeing high mortality rates in the Navajo Nation hit close to home, with personal losses emphasizing the need for effective advocacy.

“The Navajo Nation had one of the highest mortality rates of a tribal nation experiencing Covid, and I have personally lost family members during that time as well,” Haswood said. “To see the argument that this pandemic and this health virus wasn’t taken seriously was really concerning to me. So, I knew I wanted to bring the advocacy that I had.”

As a representative of the younger generation, Haswood is attuned to the economic challenges faced not only in Kansas but nationwide. Housing and child care, often overlooked issues, resonate deeply with her, reflecting the unmet needs of her generation.

“There’s not a lot of space to talk about our millennial and Gen Z problems such as housing,” Haswood said. “I personally am still in an apartment, and buying my first house seems like a dream away for me, but [there are] also issues such as child care for my colleagues who do have families or are starting families. These issues have not been invested within our state for quite a while.”

Bipartisanship, according to Haswood, aligns with the desires of Kansans. Elected not for a rigid political ideology but for her commitment to collaboration, she emphasizes the importance of working across the aisle to address shared issues.

“We can all collectively say these are issues that we want to support, and we want to help Kansas,” Haswood said. “I think you’ll hear on both sides of the aisle that one of the things that we try to do is keep Kansans in Kansas, keep our young talent in Kansas, and support our young folks to plant roots and keep Kansas their home.”

In her pursuit of a more transparent political landscape, Haswood employs social media for accessibility and engagement. By demystifying the political process and making it more relatable, she seeks to draw more people, especially the younger demographic, into active participation in politics and governance.

“I try to use my social media as a tool that I feel like is accessible, usually to a lot of folks and to young people,” Haswood said. “To get them engaged, to spread the word and to lift and unveil that curtain a bit on politics, but also make politics seem fun and accessible. Because I think if we help put the system together to make it more accessible, more people would be able to participate.”

Haswood’s journey from a challenging upbringing to a prominent position in the Kansas Legislature not only inspires hope, it underscores the importance of diverse voices in shaping a better future.

Read More

Project 2025: The Department of Labor

Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, a right-wing blueprint for Donald Trump’s return to the White House, is an ambitious manifesto to redesign the federal government and its many administrative agencies to support and sustain neo-conservative dominance for the next decade. One of the agencies in its crosshairs is the Department of Labor, as well as its affiliated agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

Project 2025 proposes a remake of the Department of Labor in order to roll back decades of labor laws and rights amidst a nostalgic “back to the future” framing based on race, gender, religion and anti-abortion sentiment. But oddly, tucked into the corners of the document are some real nuggets of innovative and progressive thinking that propose certain labor rights which even many liberals have never dared to propose.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
Preamble to the U.S. Constitution
mscornelius/Getty Images

We can’t amend 'We the People' but 'we' do need a constitutional reboot

LaRue writes at Structure Matters. He is former deputy director of the Eisenhower Institute and of the American Society of International Law.

The following article was accepted for publication prior to the attempted assassination attempt of Donald Trump. Both the author and the editors determined no changes were necessary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Beau Breslin on C-SPAN
C-CSPAN screenshot

Project 2025: A C-SPAN interview

Beau Breslin, a regular contributor to The Fulcrum, was recently interviewed on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” about Project 2025.

Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair of Political Science at Skidmore College and author of “A Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation’s Fundamental Law.” He writes “A Republic, if we can keep it,” a Fulcrum series to assist American citizens on the bumpy road ahead this election year. By highlighting components, principles and stories of the Constitution, Breslin hopes to remind us that the American political experiment remains, in the words of Alexander Hamilton, the “most interesting in the world.”

Keep ReadingShow less
People protesting laws against homelessness

People protest outside the Supreme Court as the justices prepared to hear Grants Pass v. Johnson on April 22.

Matt McClain/The Washington Post via Getty Images

High court upholds law criminalizing homelessness, making things worse

Herring is an assistant professor of sociology at UCLA, co-author of an amicus brief in Johnson v. Grants Pass and a member of the Scholars Strategy Network.

In late June, the Supreme Court decided in the case of Johnson v. Grants Pass that the government can criminalize homelessness. In the court’s 6-3 decision, split along ideological lines, the conservative justices ruled that bans on sleeping in public when there are no shelter beds available do not violate the Constitution’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

This ruling will only make homelessness worse. It may also propel U.S. localities into a “race to the bottom” in passing increasingly punitive policies aimed at locking up or banishing the unhoused.

Keep ReadingShow less
Project 2025: A federal Parents' Bill of Rights

Republican House members hold a press event to highlight the introduction in 2023.

Bill O'Leary/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Project 2025: A federal Parents' Bill of Rights

Biffle is a podcast host and contributor at BillTrack50.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

Project 2025, the conservative Heritage Foundation’s blueprint for a second Trump administration, includes an outline for a Parents' Bill of Rights, cementing parental considerations as a “top tier” right.

The proposal calls for passing legislation to ensure families have a "fair hearing in court when the federal government enforces policies that undermine their rights to raise, educate, and care for their children." Further, “the law would require the government to satisfy ‘strict scrutiny’ — the highest standard of judicial review — when the government infringes parental rights.”

Keep ReadingShow less