Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Kansas legislator Christina Haswood: Elected to work with everyone

Woman standing in a legislative chamber

Kansas state Rep. Christina Haswood

Goldsmith is the senior communications director for The Future Caucus.

Growing up, Christina Haswood struggled with poverty, relying on public resources for housing, school lunches, and tribal clothing programs. Her upbringing provided a unique advantage in understanding the economic struggles facing many in her generation and disadvantaged constituents within the district she now represents in the Kansas House of Representatives.

Born in Lawrence, Kan., following her parent’s relocation from the Navajo Nation reservation in Arizona, Haswood’s journey is deeply rooted in her community. From her early education to the initial stages of her college career, Haswood’s continuous connection to the district, as well as her heritage, form the bedrock of her commitment to public service.


“When I got tapped to run for office, I had a lot of that community support, where folks have known me and seen me since I was toddler age,” Haswood, a Democrat, said in an interview at the Future Caucus’ 2023 Future Summit. “They see me, you know, go through sports, graduating high school and starting my adult life and higher education. It was really a great experience to have that community support.”

Haswood’s entry into politics was not merely a personal choice but a response to a collective call from her community. Encouraged by former state Rep. Ponka-We Victors and other women in the Native American community, she overcame initial doubt about her age and limited political experience to run for office.

“What convinced me was that I can bring representation to other Native American and BIPOC [Black, indigenous and people of color] folks in Kansas, that we belong in these spaces, and if I win or lose, I can still bring that little bit of inspiration that once was brought to me,” Haswood said. “That’s when I decided to throw my hat in the ring to run for office.”

With academic accomplishments including an associate degree in community health from Haskell Indian Nations University, a bachelor’s degree in public health from Arizona State University and a master’s degree in public health management from the University of Kansas Medical Center, Haswood brings a wealth of knowledge to her legislative role.

Running for office during the global Covid-19 pandemic, Haswood was compelled to act, witnessing its disproportionate impact on Indigenous populations. Seeing high mortality rates in the Navajo Nation hit close to home, with personal losses emphasizing the need for effective advocacy.

“The Navajo Nation had one of the highest mortality rates of a tribal nation experiencing Covid, and I have personally lost family members during that time as well,” Haswood said. “To see the argument that this pandemic and this health virus wasn’t taken seriously was really concerning to me. So, I knew I wanted to bring the advocacy that I had.”

As a representative of the younger generation, Haswood is attuned to the economic challenges faced not only in Kansas but nationwide. Housing and child care, often overlooked issues, resonate deeply with her, reflecting the unmet needs of her generation.

“There’s not a lot of space to talk about our millennial and Gen Z problems such as housing,” Haswood said. “I personally am still in an apartment, and buying my first house seems like a dream away for me, but [there are] also issues such as child care for my colleagues who do have families or are starting families. These issues have not been invested within our state for quite a while.”

Bipartisanship, according to Haswood, aligns with the desires of Kansans. Elected not for a rigid political ideology but for her commitment to collaboration, she emphasizes the importance of working across the aisle to address shared issues.

“We can all collectively say these are issues that we want to support, and we want to help Kansas,” Haswood said. “I think you’ll hear on both sides of the aisle that one of the things that we try to do is keep Kansans in Kansas, keep our young talent in Kansas, and support our young folks to plant roots and keep Kansas their home.”

In her pursuit of a more transparent political landscape, Haswood employs social media for accessibility and engagement. By demystifying the political process and making it more relatable, she seeks to draw more people, especially the younger demographic, into active participation in politics and governance.

“I try to use my social media as a tool that I feel like is accessible, usually to a lot of folks and to young people,” Haswood said. “To get them engaged, to spread the word and to lift and unveil that curtain a bit on politics, but also make politics seem fun and accessible. Because I think if we help put the system together to make it more accessible, more people would be able to participate.”

Haswood’s journey from a challenging upbringing to a prominent position in the Kansas Legislature not only inspires hope, it underscores the importance of diverse voices in shaping a better future.

Read More

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: Impact of the Big Beautiful Bill on Health Care

U.S. President Donald Trump takes the stage during a reception for Republican members of the House of Representatives in the East Room of the White House on July 22, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump thanked GOP lawmakers for passing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

Just the Facts: Impact of the Big Beautiful Bill on Health Care

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What are the new Medicaid work requirements, and are they more lenient or more restrictive than what previously existed?

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Constitution
Imagining constitutions
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

A Bold Civic Renaissance for America’s 250th

Every September 17, Americans mark Constitution Day—the anniversary of the signing of our nation’s foundational charter in 1787. The day is often commemorated with classroom lessons and speaking events, but it is more than a ceremonial anniversary. It is an invitation to ask: What does it mean to live under a constitution that was designed as a charge for each generation to study, debate, and uphold its principles? This year, as we look toward the semiquincentennial of our nation in 2026, the question feels especially urgent.

The decade between 1776 and 1787 was defined by a period of bold and intentional nation and national identity building. In that time, the United States declared independence, crafted its first national government, won a war to make their independence a reality, threw out the first government when it failed, and forged a new federal government to lead the nation. We stand at a similar inflection point. The coming decade, from the nation’s semiquincentennial in 2026 to the Constitution’s in 2037, offers a parallel opportunity to reimagine and reinvigorate our American civic culture. Amid the challenges we face today, there’s an opportunity to study, reflect, and prepare to write the next chapters in our American story—it is as much about the past 250 years, as it is about the next 250 years. It will require the same kind of audacious commitment to building for the future that was present at the nation’s outset.

Keep ReadingShow less