Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Federal AI Advisory Committee Disbanded Under Trump’s Executive Order

News

U.S. President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House on April 23, 2025 in Washington, DC.

U.S. President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House on April 23, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

A committee part of the General Services Administration (GSA) focused on efficiency has been eliminated by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

The GSA Federal Advisory Committee’s (GAP FAC) goal was to increase efficiency in the government through the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) with its members being experts who volunteered their time for GSA. Nicole Darnall, a former member of the committee and the Arlene R. and Robert P. Kogod Eminent Scholar Chair in Sustainability at American University, said the termination of the committee was “unexpected,” especially given their emphasis on increasing efficiency in the government.


“There was no indication this was going to happen,” Darnall said.

The GAP FAC was partly established due to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) of 1972, which is the “legal foundation” for how committees, like Darnall’s, operate. FACA is reenacted every so often, with the last being on Dec. 27, 2022.

“[A committee] is established or utilized to obtain advice or recommendations for the President or one or more agencies or officers of the Federal Government,” FACA stated.

Before its total termination, the GAP FAC had two committees with two subjects. The first GAP FAC, founded in 2022, focused on increasing sustainability efforts in the government. Darnall, who is an expert in sustainability, was asked to join then. The second committee, which began in around October right before the 2024 presidential election, was the one studying how to responsibly use artificial intelligence in the government to increase efficiency.

According to the law, the over 1,000 FACA advisory groups, including the GAP FAC, have to follow certain rules like allowing their meetings to be open to the public by publishing meeting information on the Federal Register for at least 15 days.

The law also states committees can only be established for two years after which they are terminated or renewed.

“It’s sanctioned by Congress, so it’s very official,” Darnall said.

Darnall said members of the committee received an email on Feb. 25, explaining the reasoning for determination. The letter did not come from DOGE but rather from a senior official at GSA:

“On February 19, 2025, the President issued an Executive Order, “Commencing the Reduction of the Federal Bureaucracy,” which set forth the Administration’s policy of reducing the size of the Federal Government in order to minimize waste, fraud, abuse, and inflation and to promote American freedom and innovation. As part of that Executive Order, the President directed the termination of several named Federal advisory committees and further ordered the identification of ‘additional unnecessary Federal advisory committees’ for termination. In accordance with that order, the Acting GSA Administrator has terminated the GAP FAC.”

Along with Darnall and the 19 other members of GAP FAC, over 121,000 federal employees have been laid off since Trump took office in January, according to an analysis from CNN.

FACA states there are certain ways committees can be disbanded by the president. The president is allowed to terminate any on-statutory federal advisory committee, or not established or mandated by a law. Presidents can also disband committees if they were created by their own executive order. But the president cannot terminate a committee because it is required by law.

The GAP FAC is a statutory committee, meaning it was established by law.

Those who sent a letter to members of the committee, saying their work was no longer needed, did not respond to comment.

Besides Darnall, a former member of the GAP FAC, who is an expert in artificial intelligence governance and wanted to remain anonymous for privacy reasons, was brought on at the beginning of the second committee.

Although GAP FAC’s advising in artificial intelligence was only beginning, the member said they were “disappointed” the committee did not get to do the work they planned in preliminary meetings.

The member said they believe the committee was cut because of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) or how everything is going to be purchased by the federal government. The member added the new administration wants to redo FAR and the committee’s recommendations were going to get in the way.

A policy statement from the Department of Homeland Security states how they use artificial intelligence must align with ethical, legal, and regulatory standards outlined in the FAR with this same standard applying to other government agencies and departments.

“You are much stronger when you have multiple voices weighing in,” the member said. “Even if there’s disagreement, you still get a broader perspective on all the opportunities to consider.”

The member added there are “high-risk areas” where artificial intelligence can be abused in the government. For example, they said civil rights issues come into play when making an algorithm to ensure it does not discriminate against gender or race.

“I’m really concerned because I’m an AI expert,” the member said.


Maggie Rhoads is a student journalist attending George Washington University School of Media and Public Affairs. At The Fulcrum, she covers how legislation and policy are impacting communities.

Read More

Guarding What? The Moral Cost of Militarizing Our Cities

Protestors in Chicago, August 2025

Credit: Angeles Ponpa

Guarding What? The Moral Cost of Militarizing Our Cities

A federal judge recently blocked plans to deploy the National Guard to Chicago. But the battle over militarizing American streets is far from over. On Monday, a federal appeals court lifted a temporary restraining order and ruled that the National Guard can be deployed to Portland, Oregon, amid ongoing protests at the Macadam ICE Facility.

Every time political leaders propose sending troops into cities or float invoking the Insurrection Act, they test a fragile boundary that keeps democracy in check.

Keep ReadingShow less
Joe Manchin on Taxpayer-Funded Primaries: 'They're Locking Us Out!'

Joe Manchin

Alex Wong/Getty Images

Joe Manchin on Taxpayer-Funded Primaries: 'They're Locking Us Out!'

While appearing on CNN host Michael Smerconish’s show, former Democratic U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, now a registered independent, told Smerconish that “we have to have open primaries” in order to get candidates who prioritize representation to run and have a chance to win.

“We have to change the primary,” he added. “They are locking us out.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

President Donald Trump speaks at a White House press briefing on Jan. 30, 2025.

Credit: Jonah Elkowitz/Medill News Service

Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

WASHINGTON — Paul Ingrassia withdrew his nomination to lead the Office of Special Counsel on Tuesday night after facing Republican pushback over past controversial statements.

While Ingrassia joins a growing list of President Donald Trump’s nominees who have withdrawn from consideration, many who have aired controversial beliefs or lack requisite qualifications have still been appointed or are still in the nomination process.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making
low light photography of armchairs in front of desk

A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making

The dysfunction of today’s federal government is not simply the product of political division or individual leaders; it is rooted in the internal rules of Congress itself. The Founders, in one of their few major oversights, granted Congress the authority to make its own procedural rules (Article I, Section 5) without establishing any framework for how it should operate. Over time, this blank check has produced a legislative process built to serve partisan power, not public representation.

The result is a Congress that often rewards obstruction and gridlock over compromise and action. The Founders imagined representatives closely tied to their constituents—one member for every 30,000 to 50,000 citizens. Today, that ratio has ballooned to one for every 765,000 in the House, and in the Senate, each member can represent tens of millions (e.g., California). As the population has grown, representation has become distant and impersonal, while procedural rules have tightened the grip of party leadership. Major issues can no longer reach the floor unless the majority party permits it. The link between citizens and decisions has nearly vanished.

Keep ReadingShow less