Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Washington County’s Plan to Revive The American Dream

Opinion

Washington County’s Plan to Revive The American Dream

Cut outs of a family and a home.

Getty Images, Bernie_photo

Resist the urge to publish the American Dream’s obituary. It’s alive, though unwell. It’s no secret that the hallmarks of the dream have become unreachable for many Americans. Homeownership seems impossible in communities. Marriage rates have dropped. Families have shrunk. Even lifespans are on the decline. The dream’s vital signs are cause for immense concern. There are signs of life—Washington County, Wisconsin is testing two remedies that might just revive the dream there and across the country.

Just north of Milwaukee, Washington County is—in many ways—a surprising source of hope. It faces no shortage of challenges. As County officials will tell you, they’re struggling to hold on to their community members. Too few homes, too few jobs, and too few community connections led many residents to look for another place to call home. County Executive Josh Schoemann, however, refused to let the dream die in his community. He and others joined together to brainstorm novel cures for the disease eating away at prosperity.


Washington County is conducting two experiments of national significance. The first is the Next Generation Housing Initiative. Established in 2021, the program aims to remove five main barriers to increasing the supply of affordable housing: high development costs, expensive down payments, zoning barriers, access to nearby meaningful employment, and community support. They expect that addressing these issues head-on will allow them to build 1,000 homes tailored to middle-class families by 2032. As of early 2025, 210 homes had already been approved for funding, with 56 homes currently under contract or sold.

There’s plenty of reason to believe they will continue to succeed and, ultimately, reach their goal. First, they’ve left politics at home. The coalition behind the Initiative includes representatives from a range of communities and stakeholder groups. The County has also held several ad hoc working group events with realtors, lenders, educators, builders, nonprofit and faith leaders, and planners. In short, County officials have committed themselves to making their county one where people not only stay but one that actively draws more people in.

Second, they made solving basic needs a priority. The County received and accepted recovery funds in the wake of the pandemic and directed them toward recovery efforts on lost revenue. Come 2032, communities around the country should look to Washington County and see how they can emulate the initiative’s success.

Another project will also warrant adoption across the country as an American Dream stimulant. The Heart & Homestead Earned Down Payment Incentive is at once helping people find a place to call home while also helping them build community. The incentive is simple: receive up to $20,000 in down payment incentive when purchasing a home and, over the next five years, "earn" that support through community service.

The county rightfully recognizes that there’s a real financial benefit to a community in which volunteerism is a norm. For every hour of service volunteered at a local nonprofit or religious institution, a homeowner will earn $25 of the incentive. For every dollar donated to participating groups, $0.70 is earned. What’s more, the whole family can help out—contributions from anyone living in the home go toward the incentive earnings. In the event the homeowner opts not to take advantage of those volunteer and donation opportunities, the county will receive any portion of the incentive that is not earned over the course of five years upon the eventual sale of the property or transfer of the deed.

Washington County is on to something big. The American Dream is suffering because we’ve lost focus on its core components: a quality home, a quality job, and a quality community. Communities that dare to prioritize those basics, however, are proving that the dream is not dead but simply neglected. We can choose to build. We can choose to cultivate strong communities. We can choose to place people over politics.


Kevin Frazier is an Adjunct Professor at Delaware Law and an Emerging Technology Scholar at St. Thomas University College of Law.

Read More

Pro-Trump protestors
Trump supporters who attempted to overturn the 2020 election results are now seeking influential election oversight roles in battleground states.
Andrew Lichtenstein/Getty Images

Loving Someone Who Thinks the Election Was Stolen

He’s the kind of man you’d want as a neighbor in a storm.

Big guy. Strong hands. The person you’d call if your car slid into a ditch. He lives rural, works hard, supports a wife and young son, and helps care for his aging mom. Life has not been easy, but he shows up anyway.

Keep ReadingShow less
Project 2025 Drives Trump’s State Dept Overhaul

U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on December 15, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Project 2025 Drives Trump’s State Dept Overhaul

In May 2025, I wrote about the Trump administration’s early State Department reforms aligned with Project 2025, including calls for budget cuts, mission closures, and policy realignments. At the time, the most controversial move was an executive order targeting the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), shutting it down and freezing all federal foreign aid. This decision reflected Project 2025’s recommendation to scale back and "deradicalize" USAID by eliminating programs deemed overly politicized or inconsistent with conservative values. The report specifically criticized USAID for funding progressive initiatives, such as policies addressing systemic racism and central economic planning, arguing that U.S. foreign aid had become a "massive and open-ended global entitlement program" benefiting left-leaning organizations. The process connecting the report’s ideological critiques to this executive action involved a strategic alignment between key administration officials and Project 2025 architects, who lobbied for immediate policy adjustments. This coalition effectively linked the critique to policy by framing it as a necessary step toward realigning foreign aid with national interests and conservative principles.

Back then, I predicted even more sweeping changes to the State Department. Since May, several major developments have indeed reshaped the department:

Keep ReadingShow less
SNAP Isn’t a Negotiating Tool. It’s a Lifeline.
apples and bananas in brown cardboard box
Photo by Maria Lin Kim on Unsplash

SNAP Isn’t a Negotiating Tool. It’s a Lifeline.

Millions of families just survived the longest shutdown in U.S. history. Now they’re bracing again as politicians turn food assistance into a bargaining chip.

Food assistance should not be subject to politics, yet the Trump administration is now requiring over 20 Democratic-led states to share sensitive SNAP recipient data—including Social Security and immigration details—or risk losing funding. Officials call it "program integrity," but the effect is clear: millions of low-income families may once again have their access to food threatened by political disputes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats’ Redistricting Gains Face New Court Battles Ahead of 2026 Elections
us a flag on white concrete building

Democrats’ Redistricting Gains Face New Court Battles Ahead of 2026 Elections

Earlier this year, I reported on Democrats’ redistricting wins in 2025, highlighting gains in states like California and North Carolina. As of December 18, the landscape has shifted again, with new maps finalized, ongoing court battles, and looming implications for the 2026 midterms.

Here are some key developments since mid‑2025:

  • California: Voters approved Proposition 50 in November, allowing legislature‑drawn maps that eliminated three safe Republican seats and made two more competitive. Democrats in vulnerable districts were redrawn into friendlier territory.
  • Virginia: On December 15, Democrats in the House of Delegates pushed a constitutional amendment on redistricting during a special session. Republicans denounced the move as unconstitutional, setting up a legal and political fight ahead of the 2026 elections.
  • Other states in play:
    • Ohio, Texas, Utah, Missouri, North Carolina: New maps are already in effect, reshaping battlegrounds.
    • Florida and Maryland: Legislatures have begun steps toward redistricting, though maps are not yet finalized.
    • New York: Court challenges may force changes to existing maps before 2026.
    • National picture: According to VoteHub’s tracker, the current district breakdown stands at 189 Democratic‑leaning, 205 Republican‑leaning, and 41 highly competitive seats.

Implications for 2026

  • Democrats’ wins in California and North Carolina strengthen their position, but legal challenges in Virginia and New York could blunt momentum.
  • Republicans remain favored in Texas and Ohio, where maps were redrawn to secure GOP advantages.
  • The unusually high number of mid‑decade redistricting efforts — not seen at this scale since the 1800s — underscores how both parties are aggressively shaping the battlefield for 2026.
So, here's the BIG PICTURE: The December snapshot shows Democrats still benefiting from redistricting in key states, but the fight is far from settled. With courts weighing in and legislatures maneuvering, the balance of power heading into the 2026 House elections remains fluid. What began as clear Democratic wins earlier in 2025 has evolved into a multi‑front contest over maps, legality, and political control.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network