Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Governor vetoes bill adding Nevada to states spurning the Electoral College

Steve Sisolak

Office of Gov. Steve Sisolak

Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak said the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact "could diminish the role of smaller states like Nevada."

Proponents of electing the president by popular vote had a setback when Gov. Steve Sisolak vetoed legislation committing Nevada's six electoral votes to the national popular vote winner.

Sisolak, a Democrat, said joining the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact "could diminish the role of smaller states like Nevada in national electoral contests and force Nevada's electors to side with whoever wins the nationwide popular vote, rather than the candidate Nevadans choose."

That was the argument Republicans in the state legislature used against the bill. But the Democratic majorities pushed it through along party lines.


Bypassing the Electoral College has become popular mostly in Democratic-controlled states since Hillary Clinton secured 2.9 million more votes than Donald Trump but lost on electoral votes. Democrat Al Gore also outpolled Republican George W. Bush but lost the 2000 election.

Supporters of the idea say having the president elected by popular vote would shift the focus of candidates away from just a handful of swing states and allow more voters to see the candidates in action.

The interstate compact that Nevada has now stepped away from would take effect when embraced by states with a combined 270 electoral votes, an outright majority. Fourteen states and the District of Columbia, with189 electoral votes, have joined so far – three this year (the Oregon legislature is still debating the idea).

"We will continue our bipartisan work in every state until the National Popular Vote proposal takes effect and every American voter is politically relevant in every presidential election," said Patrick Rosenstiel of National Popular Vote, the group leading the campaign for the compact.

Some question the constitutionality of the compact and therefore whether it would ever go into effect even if enough states passed legislation to reach the 270-electoral-vote threshold.


Read More

The Rings and the Great Debate
Lincoln-Douglas debates

The Rings and the Great Debate

When John and Mary Ring arrived in Will County, they stepped into a world unlike anything they had known. The prairie was crowded with newcomers — Germans, Irish, Scots, English, Scandinavians — each carrying their own languages, faiths, customs, and grievances. It was a noisy, fluid, sometimes volatile mix of people who had nothing in common except the simple fact that they were here. And yet, in that crowded field of difference, the Rings recognized something essential: their survival depended on finding common ground. They didn’t have to agree with everyone. They didn’t have to like everyone. But they understood that in this new American world, no group could elevate itself above the others without consequence. The only way forward was together. This was their first lesson in American identity.

What they did not expect was the media. The American press of the 1850s was loud, partisan, explosive, and central to the political fracture that would soon tear the nation apart. Newspapers were not neutral conveyors of information — they were engines of identity, outrage, and mobilization. Every faction had its own paper. Every paper had its own truth. For immigrants like the Rings, it was disorienting. Had they escaped one form of chaos only to land in another? But instead of judging, they discerned. They listened. They watched. They learned to separate noise from signal. And in that cacophony, a voice began to rise.

Keep ReadingShow less
America was much more of a mess at the bicentennial than it is today

Crowds fill the street during an Americana Fair on 52nd Street in the borough of Manhattan, New York City, New York, 20th June 1976.

(TNS)

America was much more of a mess at the bicentennial than it is today

As we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, America is in a pretty foul mood, and I understand why. For starters, Washington is broken, prices are high and rising, and AI is scaring the stuffing out of people.

Understanding, however, is not synonymous with agreement. In other words, some complaints about America in 2026 have more empirical weight than others. Crime may be too high, but it’s been going down for a while.

Keep ReadingShow less
The first Indigenous women in Congress carry a legacy older than American democracy itself

In 2018, Sharice Davids and Deb Haaland became the first two Native American women elected to Congress. They are trailblazers from a long lineage of women whose ancestors were original inhabitants of the land that became America.

(Sarah Porter for The 19th; Getty Images, AP images)

The first Indigenous women in Congress carry a legacy older than American democracy itself

In the lead-up to our country’s 250th anniversary, Errin Haines is writing a series of columns to contemplate the complicated expansion of our democracy. Subscribe to The Amendment newsletter.

Nearly three months before the signing of the Declaration of Independence, Abigail Adams had a warning for her husband, John, one of its authors: Remember the ladies.

Keep ReadingShow less