In this episode of “Collage,” the Rev. F. Willis Johnson interviews Ryon J. Cobb, an assistant professor of Social Work at Rutgers University. His research interests focus on social determinants and consequences of population health, health disparities and the religious dimensions of racial attitudes among adults.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Top Stories
Latest news
Read More
Advance DEI, do not retreat from it
Jan 26, 2025
- President Donald Trump has directed that employees of federal offices focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) be placed on paid administrative leave.
This action is part of a broader initiative led by Elon Musk, who heads the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk has previously criticized DEI initiatives, labeling them as detrimental.
The ongoing debate around DEI laws and programs has seen significant opposition from some Republican leaders, who argue that these initiatives may undermine merit-based systems in hiring and education, particularly for white individuals.
Trump's stance on DEI programs is having a significant impact not only within the federal government but also on American business practices, state policies, and higher education institutions.
In It is time to rethink DEI, Fulcrum co-publisher David Nevins wrote: In the coming months, The Fulcrum will reexamine the complexities of DEI. We must ask ourselves if diversity means a granting of privileges to those who are not deserving or whether it means an equality of opportunity so that our nation can merely live into the diversity that is America. As politicians will use fear to appeal to the hearts and minds of Americans, The Fulcrum will instead lead through deep inquiry and analysis.
Nevins, Kristina Becvar (co-publisher, Fulcrum), and I discussed the challenges and opportunities of diversity, equity, and inclusion in a recent episode of the Fulcrum Democracy Forum.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
- YouTubeyoutu.be
“The piece that David wrote; I saw what he saw,” said Becvar. “Instant reaction to words, and that is to me the crux of the whole debate around DEI because the term has been used by those that are looking to sew conflict and benefit from it. And we’ve gotten away from the discussion of what that (DEI) even means.”
As the persons charged with the editorial focus of the Fulcrum, we firmly believe this isn’t a time to cower to political pressure and retreat from programs necessary to ensure that institutions meet the needs of increasingly diverse populations. This is the time to advance on DEI initiatives.
I am a diversity, equity, and inclusion trainer and practitioner. As such, I share in the support and criticism of programs that, while well-intentioned and necessary, have often missed their goal. It’s been my experience that this is largely due to the short-sightedness of C-suite decision-makers who see DEI as a problem to be solved rather than an opportunity to be realized. A negative rather than a positive.
When faced with a problem, people tend to rush to fix it. That’s when mistakes are made. The intent is far from the impact. When faced with an opportunity, people tend to take a step back to strategize on how to acquire it. They invite others to do the same.
Also, initiatives fail when they’re conceptualized as superficial corporate marketing; “lipstick on a pig.”DEI initiatives should be transformative workplace culture tools examining if the status quo is reflective of and relevant to our ever changing society.
The Fulcrum welcomes the discussion and debate on redefining DEI to serve all communities best, leveraging the rich complexity of their diversity, and not just the optics of it.
David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.
Kristina Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.
.Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and a board member of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network and a trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended
One faction in Congress DOES look like America
Jan 22, 2025
Congress is often criticized for being “out of touch” with the American public. One biting critique is that Congress just doesn’t “look like” the constituents they represent. Its members are overwhelmingly more male, white, educated, and older than the general U.S. population. And while this holds true for most of Congress, there is one faction where it is not true: Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives. House Democrats more closely align with the demographic breakdown in the U.S. than any other party and chamber. There are some disparities—there are almost twice as many Black Democratic House members (25 percent) compared to the 14 percent in the U.S. population. And women are still a minority in the House Democratic Caucus (43 percent). But in other areas, House Democrats closely track America by race and gender. Hispanic and Latino House Democrats are at 17 percent, compared to 19 percent in the U.S. Even the ratio of LGBTQ members of the House is rising—with about five percent among House Democrats compared to seven percent in the U.S.
This is more than just a symbolic exercise. As the Native American saying goes, “Never judge a person until you walk a mile in his moccasins.” When our elected representatives share the living experiences of those they represent, it increases the likelihood they will be responsive to the needs and aspirations of the public. By comparison, House Republicans are woefully overrepresented by men (85 percent), and only one percent are Black and six percent are Latino. After being ousted as Speaker of the House, Rep. Kevin McCarthy in an interview lamented the sorry state of diversity in the Republican Conference. “I’d just become leader and I’m excited and President Trump’s there. And I look over at the Democrats and they stand up. They look like America,” he said. “We stand up. We look like the most restrictive country club in America.”
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Beyond the moral arguments in favor of a more diverse Congress, there are economic and performance benefits as well. A 2017 study showed that more diverse companies produce 19 percent more revenue than less diverse teams. (Yes, it is actually more profitable to diversify your team.) One of the great proponents and success stories of the benefits of diversity is an unusual source: the United States Army. At West Point, about 38 percent of its 2027 class will be of a racial/ethnic minority group—composed of Black, Latino, Asian American, and Native American students. “The cultural and ethnic differences of its Soldiers are the unique assets that our adversaries lack,” said Sgt. Maj. Alexander Aguilastratt in an Army University Press article. “Diversity in the U.S. Army is its strength and combat multiplier,” he said.
Much work also has been done to increase diversity in the ranks of congressional staff. The Joint Center on Political and Economic Studies has produced excellent research showing the imbalance of Black staffers in senior positions compared to the American population. In 2020, a bipartisan effort to increase staff diversity included the launching of a House Office of Diversity and Inclusion under the supervision of the Speaker of the House. In 2023, when Republicans gained a majority in the House, nearly all staff from this office were moved to the chamber’s administrative human resources offices. The jury is still out as to whether this new arrangement will produce intended results. Yet, it could be argued that recruiting and hiring diverse staff is better in the hands of H.R. professionals than a political operation like the Speaker’s office.
The current backlash against diversity programs in the U.S. is probably only a temporary setback. The predictable demographic trends dictate that business, academia, and government adequately respond to the inevitable changes an increasingly diverse nation will demand. Elected officials should play their part by recruiting more diverse candidates for public office, as both government and constituents will benefit from legislatures that look more like the people they represent.
Bradford Fitch is a former congressional staffer and the author of The Citizen’s Handbook to Influencing Elected Officials.
Keep ReadingShow less
Bridging Hearts in a Divided America
Jan 20, 2025
This story is part of the We the Peopleseries, elevating the voices and visibility of the persons most affected by the decisions of elected officials. In this installment, we share the hopes and concerns of people as Donald Trump returns to the White House.
An Arctic blast is gripping the nation’s capital this Inauguration Day, which coincides with Martin Luther King Jr. Day. A rare occurrence since this federal holiday was instituted in 1983. Temperatures are in the single digits, and Donald J. Trump is taking the oath of office inside the Capitol Rotunda instead of being on the steps of the Capitol, making him less visible to his fans who traveled to Washington D.C. for this momentous occasion. What an emblematic scenario for such a unique political moment in history.
The country is experiencing a polar vortex, both literally and figuratively. Americans seem to be frozen in their perceptions of reality. Some are truly upbeat about the prospect of a second Trump presidency, while others are terrified and believe we are headed toward an autocratic regime.
Mikey Johnson, a caricature artist living in Virginia, is hopeful and excited about the next four years. From an economic standpoint, he believes everyone’s life will improve under President Trump. “I feel like the grown-up is finally in the White House, and he is going to do the things grown-ups do. People will be held responsible for criminal acts, and the border will be finally sealed off. Only people who apply legally will be able to come to America. This is, after all, a nation of immigrants.”
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Asked whether President Trump could represent all Americans, Johnson said, “Absolutely, he wants to be everyone’s president. I have been listening to him since the first time he ran for president. You never hear anything derogatory towards any race. Even as a businessman, it did not matter the gender or the race of a person. He is a man who didn't have to run for president. He loves this country, has big plans and is for whatever is best for all Americans.”
Cathy Harmon Christian, Executive Director for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, is concerned about “the spoken and unspoken dehumanization of the most vulnerable.” The Atlanta, Georgia resident says there is a movement in the country to ostracize people who are transgender, immigrant, and incarcerated. “I believe that everyone belongs and that we are all interconnected. My experience has been that President Trump does not see the world the way that I do. He likes to pit one person against another.”
(From left to right, beginning at the top) Patricia Gomez (WI), Reginald Robinson (DC), Vicky Chen (MA), Mikey Johnson (VA), Cathy Harmon Christian (GA)
Modern psychology tells us that our perspectives and worldviews are shaped by culture, our life experiences, and the context we live in. Where and how we consume information is also an important factor influencing how we think about the world. Social media algorithms, which determine what content appears as we scroll, have faced intense scrutiny recently for deepening America's political divide and reinforcing our ideological bubbles. This may, in part, explain the diametrically opposed views.
“As a mother of two boys in kindergarten, I feel America has changed, and not for the better. We are not as crime-free as before. I feel more confident and safer with Trump as president, and I know he will grow the economy,” says Vicky Chen, a restaurant owner in Boston, Massachusetts. Chen says that sexuality is a taboo topic in traditional Chinese culture, and she does not feel comfortable with LGBTQ ideas. “I don’t want that ideology to influence my children. President Trump said the term LGBTQ only stands for two words: male and female, and that works for me.”
But, concepts of safety and sexuality are subjective and rooted in lived experiences. Patricia Gomez, a bilingual teacher in a charter school in Wisconsin, is worried about the safety of her students. “As a Latina who works with underprivileged communities, I carry with me the history, culture, and resilience of these communities. I worry about the impact of mass deportations on the families I work with and on the economy.” “She admits that she cannot think beyond this month and wants “to bring more awareness to the parents I work with in case something drastic happens to them or to my students.”
Reginald Robinson, a distinguished law professor at Howard University, considers himself an outlier at his undergraduate alma mater, but stands firmly by his convictions. “President Trump plans to sunset the IRS and replace it with the external revenue service that deals with tariffs and trade. This will increase the country’s revenue and relieve us of an oppressive tax burden.” Robinson believes that since 1871, America has been run as a private corporation, not a constitutional republic. “Trump will return our country to the people. He will have four years of re-growing the prosperity of America for all of us.”
Many people nationwide feel vindicated that Trump got elected for a second term. Robinson, who believes that Trump overwhelmingly won the last election, says, “We have seen what happens when we push a narrative inconsistent with the desires of the majority of the country.” He blames legacy media for misleading us, especially around January 6. “People who participated in the so-called insurrection have been wasting away in prison.” While he supports holding individuals accountable for destroying public property, he urges President Trump to pardon the wrongfully convicted promptly.
Can we agree to disagree and simultaneously stay focused on our shared humanity? What Americans have in common may be surprisingly more than what separates us. After all, there is ample evidence that most Americans care about essential issues such as equitable access to quality health care, support of fundamental democratic principles, immigration reform, and stricter gun control measures. Those interviewed for this story share a genuine concern for family, community, and country.
When asked what he would tell a fellow American who's afraid of a second Trump presidency, Johnson said, “Give him [President Trump] the benefit of the doubt. Don’t be afraid unless he demonstrates a real reason to fear his presidency. Keep in mind that over half of the country voted for him, and they trust that he will do what’s best to lead us for the next four years,” says Johnson. “We don’t always get the candidate, or political party, that we want in office, but we all must try to relax and accept what is.”
Harmon Christian wants those who voted for Trump to “be sensitive and alert to vulnerable people and communities, especially if they lose their rights, representation and respect. Believe them when they say what’s happening to them.”
As an Indigenous woman from Colombia, Gomez says that First Nations people have a tradition of healing circles where individuals are invited to come together, transcend their differences, and connect as human beings, speaking from the heart.
Maybe it is not a coincidence that the second inauguration of President Trump overlaps with Dr. King’s Day. The message in these polarized times is to try and connect to each other from the heart. As Dr. King said during a sermon reproduced in his 1963 book Strength to Love, “Love is the greatest force in the universe. It is the heartbeat of the moral cosmos. He who loves is a participant in the being of God.”
Beatrice Spadacini is a freelance journalist who writes about social justice and public health.
Keep ReadingShow less
A pastoral response to the Madison school shooting
Dec 26, 2024
In the lingering aftermath of thetragic shooting at Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wisconsin, where a 15-year-old student's actions claimed two precious lives and wounded six others, we find ourselves once again gathered at the altar of our collective grief. As a pastor and parent, my heart breaks not just for the lives lost but for a generation of children who have come to know active shooter drills as routinely as they know their morning prayers.
The question echoes through our sanctuaries and school hallways: Why? Why do such terrible things happen to good people? Why must our children bear witness to such darkness? Rabbi Harold Kushner, in his profound wrestling with human suffering, reminds us that "God does not cause our misfortunes. Some are caused by bad luck, bad people cause some, and some are simply an inevitable consequence of our being human and being mortal." Yet this theological framework, while offering some comfort, cannot fully salve the wounds of a community torn apart by violence.
People of faith must confront uncomfortable truths like: Our prayers, while essential, must be paired with urgent action.The haunting statistics tell us that gun-related incidents on school grounds in 2024 surpassed the total from 2023. Each number represents not just a statistic but also a child of God, a bearer of divine image and an unfinished story. We cannot afford to wait any longer.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Christian scriptures remind of Jesus weeping at Lazarus's tomb in times likened to these. The prophet of antiquity didn't just offer platitudes or tertiary-level theological explanations — Jesus entered fully into the grief of the moment. Today, we, too, ought to allow ourselves to weep, lament and cry out in holy anger at the continued sacrifice of our children on the altar of political inaction. Yet we cannot remain in our grief. As interfaith leaders and concerned citizens, we are called to act. Here are three ways we can respond with both faith and practical wisdom:
Create sacred spaces for healing. Build intentional spaces in our houses of worship, schools and community centers where young people can express their fears and anxieties without judgment. This means training our spiritual leaders, teachers and counselors in trauma-informed care that honors emotional and spiritual needs and partnering with mental health professionals to offer free or low-cost counseling services through our faith communities.
Engage in holy disruption. We must move beyond thoughts and prayers to prophetic action. Form interfaith coalitions to advocate for sensible gun legislation and increased mental health resources in schools.With 12 children dying from gun violence each day in America, our silence is no longer an option. Write to legislators, organize peaceful demonstrations and use our pulpits to speak truth to power.
Build beloved community. Strengthen the bonds between our faith communities, schools and families. Create mentorship programs pairing youth with caring adults who can provide guidance and support. Establish regular interfaith gatherings that foster understanding and connection across religious and cultural boundaries. When young people feel truly seen and valued by their community, they are less likely to turn to violence.
To our young people: Your fear is valid. Your anger is understood. Your grief is holy. We see you, and we stand with you. Know that your faith communities are not just buildings where we gather once a week but living sanctuaries where you can bring your whole selves — your questions, doubts, pain and hope.
To parents and educators: Remember that you're not alone in these challenging times. Draw strength from your faith traditions, but don't hesitate to seek help. Create space in your homes and classrooms for difficult conversations about violence, fear and hope.
As we progress from this tragedy, remember that while we cannot always prevent bad things from happening to good people, we can choose how we respond. We can turn our pain into purpose, our grief into action and our faith into tangible change. In the words of the prophet Isaiah, "And a little child shall lead them." It's time we listen to our children's cries for safety and peace and respond not just with prayers but with the full measure of our moral courage and collective action.
May the Divine Presence comfort all who mourn, heal those wounded and grant us all the wisdom and strength to build a world worthy of our children's trust.
Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More