Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Bridging divides in a multiracial democracy

people running with an American flag
g-stockstudio/Getty Images

Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

The fabric of our multiracial democracy is constantly tested, and we find ourselves at a crossroads. Our journey toward building a resilient democracy, one that is enriched by diversity and guided by the pursuit of justice, is more crucial than ever. This piece is an exploration, inspired by insights from our member organizations, into how we can deepen our commitment to fostering a multiracial democracy that genuinely embodies the principles of inclusivity and justice.

The heartbeat of democracy: Inclusivity and justice

The recently published article by Maria Stephan, "Can Multiracial Democracy Survive? lays bare the intertwined destinies of racial justice and the health of our democracy. This foundational piece illuminates the systemic challenges undermining our democracy, particularly the enduring scars of racism and the specter of authoritarianism. It exposes the systemic hurdles eroding the foundations of our democratic system, particularly through the lens of racism and the looming threat of authoritarianism. Stephan's call for a holistic strategy that intertwines racial justice with the integrity of our democracy cannot be overemphasized. It serves as a practical guide to strengthening our democracy through honest discussions about racism, investment in practices that strengthen democracy, and acknowledging the critical role of faith organizations in supporting democratic norms and combating racism. In our pursuit of that vibrant, inclusive democracy, we must recognize that challenges such as authoritarianism, racism, immigration, and misinformation are not isolated issues but interconnected threads that weave through the fabric of our society.

Immigration

The contentious immigration policies in Texas featured by AllSides highlight the tension between state actions and federal oversight, reflecting broader debates about national identity and belonging. This discourse, while seemingly distant from the conversation on multiracial democracy, is, in fact, deeply intertwined with our nation's ongoing dialogue about who gets to participate in our democracy and on what terms.

Separately, the myths surrounding noncitizen voting are a prime example of how misinformation can erode the trust in our electoral systems. The pervasiveness of these myths, rooted in historical misconceptions, underscores the dangerous potential of misinformation to undermine faith in our electoral processes and, by extension, our democracy itself. The health of our democracy is contingent on an informed and engaged citizenry, capable of discerning truth from falsehood, and willing to have the conversations necessary to stop legislation based on unfounded concerns and refocus on our true challenges.

Historical reflections and future directions

Divided We Fall has published a debate on the question of "Should We Tear Down Historical Monuments?" featuring contrasting views on the removal of controversial sites. Esther Wickham and Sean Fischer engage in a critical dialogue about our collective memory and the potential for education and reconciliation in how we address our history. This discourse forces us to confront the values we choose to honor and the narratives we choose to amplify and is pivotal in reconciling our past and forging a path forward that embraces a more inclusive narrative.

Voting trends

American Values Coalition did a deep dive into recent shifts in the political allegiance of non-white voters. These shifts underscore the imperative for political parties to better engage with and understand the diverse communities that constitute the American mosaic. Differences in religiosity within the Democratic coalition, which includes a significant number of areligious and religiously diverse voters, may contribute to these changes, underscoring the complex interplay between race, religion, and political alignment. This acknowledgment again ties back to Stephan's reminder that faith-based efforts to combat racism and strengthen democracy have enormous potential to "instill hope and rejuvenate religious imagination for drawing us closer to the Beloved Community."

DEI critiques

The critique of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in education underscores the necessity of genuine engagement with diversity as a cornerstone of democratic vitality. These initiatives, when thoughtfully applied, can bridge divides and enrich our collective understanding. Together, these discussions illuminate the complexity of our shared history and the ongoing effort to craft a democracy that truly reflects the richness of our diverse nation.

A unified path forward

The success of a multiracial democracy depends not on avoiding tough conversations but embracing them. It relies on our ability to transcend divisions and build a future grounded in diversity, equity, and collective impact. The path forward is fraught with challenges, yet it is filled with opportunities for those willing to engage in the hard work of building bridges rather than walls. By confronting systemic racism, reevaluating our historical narratives, combating misinformation, and fostering inclusive dialogues, we demonstrate our collective resolve. We stand on the cusp of redefining what a vibrant, inclusive democracy looks like—an endeavor not just possible but essential for the future of our nation.

Read More

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less