Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Bridging divides in a multiracial democracy

people running with an American flag
g-stockstudio/Getty Images

Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

The fabric of our multiracial democracy is constantly tested, and we find ourselves at a crossroads. Our journey toward building a resilient democracy, one that is enriched by diversity and guided by the pursuit of justice, is more crucial than ever. This piece is an exploration, inspired by insights from our member organizations, into how we can deepen our commitment to fostering a multiracial democracy that genuinely embodies the principles of inclusivity and justice.

The heartbeat of democracy: Inclusivity and justice

The recently published article by Maria Stephan, "Can Multiracial Democracy Survive? lays bare the intertwined destinies of racial justice and the health of our democracy. This foundational piece illuminates the systemic challenges undermining our democracy, particularly the enduring scars of racism and the specter of authoritarianism. It exposes the systemic hurdles eroding the foundations of our democratic system, particularly through the lens of racism and the looming threat of authoritarianism. Stephan's call for a holistic strategy that intertwines racial justice with the integrity of our democracy cannot be overemphasized. It serves as a practical guide to strengthening our democracy through honest discussions about racism, investment in practices that strengthen democracy, and acknowledging the critical role of faith organizations in supporting democratic norms and combating racism. In our pursuit of that vibrant, inclusive democracy, we must recognize that challenges such as authoritarianism, racism, immigration, and misinformation are not isolated issues but interconnected threads that weave through the fabric of our society.

Immigration

The contentious immigration policies in Texas featured by AllSides highlight the tension between state actions and federal oversight, reflecting broader debates about national identity and belonging. This discourse, while seemingly distant from the conversation on multiracial democracy, is, in fact, deeply intertwined with our nation's ongoing dialogue about who gets to participate in our democracy and on what terms.

Separately, the myths surrounding noncitizen voting are a prime example of how misinformation can erode the trust in our electoral systems. The pervasiveness of these myths, rooted in historical misconceptions, underscores the dangerous potential of misinformation to undermine faith in our electoral processes and, by extension, our democracy itself. The health of our democracy is contingent on an informed and engaged citizenry, capable of discerning truth from falsehood, and willing to have the conversations necessary to stop legislation based on unfounded concerns and refocus on our true challenges.

Historical reflections and future directions

Divided We Fall has published a debate on the question of "Should We Tear Down Historical Monuments?" featuring contrasting views on the removal of controversial sites. Esther Wickham and Sean Fischer engage in a critical dialogue about our collective memory and the potential for education and reconciliation in how we address our history. This discourse forces us to confront the values we choose to honor and the narratives we choose to amplify and is pivotal in reconciling our past and forging a path forward that embraces a more inclusive narrative.

Voting trends

American Values Coalition did a deep dive into recent shifts in the political allegiance of non-white voters. These shifts underscore the imperative for political parties to better engage with and understand the diverse communities that constitute the American mosaic. Differences in religiosity within the Democratic coalition, which includes a significant number of areligious and religiously diverse voters, may contribute to these changes, underscoring the complex interplay between race, religion, and political alignment. This acknowledgment again ties back to Stephan's reminder that faith-based efforts to combat racism and strengthen democracy have enormous potential to "instill hope and rejuvenate religious imagination for drawing us closer to the Beloved Community."

DEI critiques

The critique of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in education underscores the necessity of genuine engagement with diversity as a cornerstone of democratic vitality. These initiatives, when thoughtfully applied, can bridge divides and enrich our collective understanding. Together, these discussions illuminate the complexity of our shared history and the ongoing effort to craft a democracy that truly reflects the richness of our diverse nation.

A unified path forward

The success of a multiracial democracy depends not on avoiding tough conversations but embracing them. It relies on our ability to transcend divisions and build a future grounded in diversity, equity, and collective impact. The path forward is fraught with challenges, yet it is filled with opportunities for those willing to engage in the hard work of building bridges rather than walls. By confronting systemic racism, reevaluating our historical narratives, combating misinformation, and fostering inclusive dialogues, we demonstrate our collective resolve. We stand on the cusp of redefining what a vibrant, inclusive democracy looks like—an endeavor not just possible but essential for the future of our nation.

Read More

National Museum of African American History and Culture, a Smithsonian museum with unique exhibits on African American history, culture & community, Washington, D.C., USA

The National Museum of African American History and Culture, a Smithsonian museum with unique exhibits on African American history, culture & community, Washington, D.C., USA

Getty Images, PurpleImages

Florida’s Anti-DEI Politics Will Destroy the Culture Museums are Created to Support

Recently, I sat in my museum’s annual public programming meeting, expecting the usual work of dreaming up the next year: what our community needs and what children deserve. But when Florida’s anti-DEI measure, SB 1134, came up, the room shifted from possibility to fear.

That meeting is usually the best part of our jobs. This time, however, the conversation turned to risk: what would become too dangerous to defend and what would be dropped before anyone even had to tell us to drop it. One of our managers finally said, “Culture is dead.” What I heard was more precise: culture is not dead. It is being killed.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer.

Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer arrives to the chambers of the U.S. House of Representatives ahead of President Trump's State of the Union address on February 24, 2026. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu/Getty Images)

Nathan Posner/Anadolu/Getty Images

In Two Months, Trump’s Cabinet Has Lost Three Women

President Donald Trump’s second Cabinet was never exceptionally diverse from the start. And in the past two months, three women have been fired or resigned.

The first to go, on March 5, was ex-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, the face of the Trump administration’s mass deportation agenda. Then, less than a month later, Trump ousted former Attorney General Pam Bondi. And on Monday, embattled Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer announced her resignation.

Keep ReadingShow less
American flag on a military uniform

Amid rising tensions with Iran, critics warn Trump-era military policies, discrimination, and leadership decisions are weakening U.S. readiness and national security.

adamkaz/Getty Images

Uncle Sam Wants You—Just Not Women or People of Color

As Trump’s War in Iran causes unprecedented global volatility, revealing significant weaknesses in our military, the President and his Secretary of War can’t seem to stop playing the politics of prejudice. A year ago, without explanation, Hegseth fired the first ever female Chief of Naval Operations and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a Black man. The latter was an F-16 pilot who once said in a recruitment commercial: “When I’m flying…You don’t know…whether I’m African American…You just know I’m an American Airman, kicking your butt.” Turns out when he wasn’t flying his boss figured out his race and kicked him off his post. Now, Hegseth has interfered with promotions for over a dozen Black and female senior officers across all branches, including blocking four outstanding Army officers–two Black men and two women–from becoming one-star generals. What was presented as "anti-woke" posturing is clearly little more than a thinly-veiled and targeted culture war. These racist, sexist, superficial “leaders” gotta go.

The war against wokeness is morally and strategically wrong, distracting us all from real missions. Instead of swiftly ending an ill-defined, illegal, indefinite war with Iran (that is not going well, to say the least) or addressing an ongoing manpower shortage, Hegseth went out of his way to unilaterally stop the advancement of four diverse officers with long careers of “exemplary service,” despite questionable legal authority to do so and against the counsel of the Secretary of the Army. Allegations of racial and gender bias are apropos, but it’s also just plain stupid. Roughly 43% of active duty troops are people of color while their leadership is overwhelmingly white, and women are leaving the military at a rate 28% higher than men. At a time when the military could use all the talent it can get, why is Hegseth keeping competent leaders from leading and disqualifying and disenfranchising over half the talent pool?

Keep ReadingShow less
America at 250: Patriotic Lament From Her Darker Sons

As the United States nears its 250th anniversary, Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson explores the nation’s founding contradictions, enduring racial inequalities, and the ongoing struggle to align democratic ideals with reality.

Getty Images

America at 250: Patriotic Lament From Her Darker Sons

As the United States approaches its 250th birthday, the nation confronts a moment that should stir both celebration and sober reflection. A quarter millennium is no small achievement in the long arc of human governance. Republics have faltered far sooner. Yet anniversaries, especially ones of this magnitude, are not merely commemorations of survival. These observances are invitations to take inventory. Thus, demanding that we ask not only what we have built, but what we have become.

The American story is told in two intertwined registers. One is triumphant: a daring rebellion reshaping political thought, expanding liberty. The other is quieter and often suppressed: a republic professing universal rights while sanctioning human bondage, preaching equality but benefiting only a select few. In our 250th year, we are invited to see these two narratives as inseparable, each shaping and challenging the other.

Keep ReadingShow less