Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Bridging divides in a multiracial democracy

people running with an American flag
g-stockstudio/Getty Images

Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

The fabric of our multiracial democracy is constantly tested, and we find ourselves at a crossroads. Our journey toward building a resilient democracy, one that is enriched by diversity and guided by the pursuit of justice, is more crucial than ever. This piece is an exploration, inspired by insights from our member organizations, into how we can deepen our commitment to fostering a multiracial democracy that genuinely embodies the principles of inclusivity and justice.

The heartbeat of democracy: Inclusivity and justice

The recently published article by Maria Stephan, "Can Multiracial Democracy Survive? lays bare the intertwined destinies of racial justice and the health of our democracy. This foundational piece illuminates the systemic challenges undermining our democracy, particularly the enduring scars of racism and the specter of authoritarianism. It exposes the systemic hurdles eroding the foundations of our democratic system, particularly through the lens of racism and the looming threat of authoritarianism. Stephan's call for a holistic strategy that intertwines racial justice with the integrity of our democracy cannot be overemphasized. It serves as a practical guide to strengthening our democracy through honest discussions about racism, investment in practices that strengthen democracy, and acknowledging the critical role of faith organizations in supporting democratic norms and combating racism. In our pursuit of that vibrant, inclusive democracy, we must recognize that challenges such as authoritarianism, racism, immigration, and misinformation are not isolated issues but interconnected threads that weave through the fabric of our society.

Immigration

The contentious immigration policies in Texas featured by AllSides highlight the tension between state actions and federal oversight, reflecting broader debates about national identity and belonging. This discourse, while seemingly distant from the conversation on multiracial democracy, is, in fact, deeply intertwined with our nation's ongoing dialogue about who gets to participate in our democracy and on what terms.

Separately, the myths surrounding noncitizen voting are a prime example of how misinformation can erode the trust in our electoral systems. The pervasiveness of these myths, rooted in historical misconceptions, underscores the dangerous potential of misinformation to undermine faith in our electoral processes and, by extension, our democracy itself. The health of our democracy is contingent on an informed and engaged citizenry, capable of discerning truth from falsehood, and willing to have the conversations necessary to stop legislation based on unfounded concerns and refocus on our true challenges.

Historical reflections and future directions

Divided We Fall has published a debate on the question of "Should We Tear Down Historical Monuments?" featuring contrasting views on the removal of controversial sites. Esther Wickham and Sean Fischer engage in a critical dialogue about our collective memory and the potential for education and reconciliation in how we address our history. This discourse forces us to confront the values we choose to honor and the narratives we choose to amplify and is pivotal in reconciling our past and forging a path forward that embraces a more inclusive narrative.

Voting trends

American Values Coalition did a deep dive into recent shifts in the political allegiance of non-white voters. These shifts underscore the imperative for political parties to better engage with and understand the diverse communities that constitute the American mosaic. Differences in religiosity within the Democratic coalition, which includes a significant number of areligious and religiously diverse voters, may contribute to these changes, underscoring the complex interplay between race, religion, and political alignment. This acknowledgment again ties back to Stephan's reminder that faith-based efforts to combat racism and strengthen democracy have enormous potential to "instill hope and rejuvenate religious imagination for drawing us closer to the Beloved Community."

DEI critiques

The critique of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in education underscores the necessity of genuine engagement with diversity as a cornerstone of democratic vitality. These initiatives, when thoughtfully applied, can bridge divides and enrich our collective understanding. Together, these discussions illuminate the complexity of our shared history and the ongoing effort to craft a democracy that truly reflects the richness of our diverse nation.

A unified path forward

The success of a multiracial democracy depends not on avoiding tough conversations but embracing them. It relies on our ability to transcend divisions and build a future grounded in diversity, equity, and collective impact. The path forward is fraught with challenges, yet it is filled with opportunities for those willing to engage in the hard work of building bridges rather than walls. By confronting systemic racism, reevaluating our historical narratives, combating misinformation, and fostering inclusive dialogues, we demonstrate our collective resolve. We stand on the cusp of redefining what a vibrant, inclusive democracy looks like—an endeavor not just possible but essential for the future of our nation.

Read More

Liberty and Justice for Some

Stephanie Toliver examines book bans, transgender rights in Kansas, the impacts of ICE detentions, and the history of conditional equality in America’s schools, libraries, and churches.

Getty Images, Catherine McQueen

Liberty and Justice for Some

Late February brought two stories that most Americans filed under separate categories. In Kansas, the state government invalidated the driver's licenses and birth certificates of transgender residents, erasing legal identities with the stroke of a pen. In New York, a Columbia University neuroscience student named Ellie Aghayeva was taken from her campus apartment by federal agents who misrepresented themselves to get through the door and held by ICE until the city's mayor personally petitioned for her release. Different people, different states, different mechanisms. The same message: for some of us, the promises of this nation were always conditional.

And yet, many Americans hold onto the lie of equality because acknowledging the truth would mean that the foundational promise we have repeated since childhood — liberty and justice for all — was never meant for all of us. It is far easier to accept comfortable fictions than to reckon with a truth that destabilizes everything you thought you knew. That meritocracy is real. That all are equal. That the documents we carry and the institutions we enter will protect us the same way they protect everyone else. But for many of us, there was never a fiction to hold onto. We were born into the conditions the lie was designed to obscure.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two individuals Skiing in the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Paralympic Games.

Oksana Masters of Team United States celebrates after winning gold in the Para Cross Country Skiing Sprint Sitting Final on day four of the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Paralympic Games at Tesero Cross-Country Skiing Stadium on March 10, 2026 in Val di Fiemme, Italy.

Getty Images, Buda Mendes

The Paralympics Challenge Everything We Think We Know About Sports

If you’re a sports fan, you likely watched coverage of the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milano Cortina. But will you watch the Paralympics when approximately 665 athletes are expected in Italy to compete in the Para sports of alpine skiing, biathlon, cross-country skiing, ice hockey, snowboarding, and wheelchair curling?

The Paralympics, so-called because they are “parallel” to the Olympics, stand alone as the globe’s premier sporting event for elite athletes with disabilities. According to the International Paralympic Committee, 4,400 disabled athletes competed in the 2024 Paris Summer Games in track and field, swimming, and twenty other sports.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change

Claiming Contested Values

FrameWorks Institute

How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change

Claiming Contested Values: How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change, produced by the FrameWorks Institute, explores how widely shared yet politically contested values can be used to strengthen public support for systemic reform. Values are central to how advocates communicate the importance of their work, and they can motivate collective action toward big, structural changes. This has become especially urgent in a climate where executive orders are targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, and some nonprofits are being labeled as threats based on their stated missions. Many civil society organizations are now grappling with how to communicate their values effectively and safely.

The report focuses on Fairness, Stability, and Freedom because they resonate across the U.S. public and are used by communicators across the political spectrum. Unlike values more closely associated with one ideological camp — such as Tradition on the right or Solidarity on the left — these three values are broadly recognizable but highly contested. Each contains multiple variants, and their impact depends on how clearly advocates define them and how they are paired with specific issues.

Keep ReadingShow less