Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Bridging divides in a multiracial democracy

people running with an American flag
g-stockstudio/Getty Images

Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

The fabric of our multiracial democracy is constantly tested, and we find ourselves at a crossroads. Our journey toward building a resilient democracy, one that is enriched by diversity and guided by the pursuit of justice, is more crucial than ever. This piece is an exploration, inspired by insights from our member organizations, into how we can deepen our commitment to fostering a multiracial democracy that genuinely embodies the principles of inclusivity and justice.

The heartbeat of democracy: Inclusivity and justice

The recently published article by Maria Stephan, "Can Multiracial Democracy Survive? lays bare the intertwined destinies of racial justice and the health of our democracy. This foundational piece illuminates the systemic challenges undermining our democracy, particularly the enduring scars of racism and the specter of authoritarianism. It exposes the systemic hurdles eroding the foundations of our democratic system, particularly through the lens of racism and the looming threat of authoritarianism. Stephan's call for a holistic strategy that intertwines racial justice with the integrity of our democracy cannot be overemphasized. It serves as a practical guide to strengthening our democracy through honest discussions about racism, investment in practices that strengthen democracy, and acknowledging the critical role of faith organizations in supporting democratic norms and combating racism. In our pursuit of that vibrant, inclusive democracy, we must recognize that challenges such as authoritarianism, racism, immigration, and misinformation are not isolated issues but interconnected threads that weave through the fabric of our society.

Immigration

The contentious immigration policies in Texas featured by AllSides highlight the tension between state actions and federal oversight, reflecting broader debates about national identity and belonging. This discourse, while seemingly distant from the conversation on multiracial democracy, is, in fact, deeply intertwined with our nation's ongoing dialogue about who gets to participate in our democracy and on what terms.

Separately, the myths surrounding noncitizen voting are a prime example of how misinformation can erode the trust in our electoral systems. The pervasiveness of these myths, rooted in historical misconceptions, underscores the dangerous potential of misinformation to undermine faith in our electoral processes and, by extension, our democracy itself. The health of our democracy is contingent on an informed and engaged citizenry, capable of discerning truth from falsehood, and willing to have the conversations necessary to stop legislation based on unfounded concerns and refocus on our true challenges.

Historical reflections and future directions

Divided We Fall has published a debate on the question of "Should We Tear Down Historical Monuments?" featuring contrasting views on the removal of controversial sites. Esther Wickham and Sean Fischer engage in a critical dialogue about our collective memory and the potential for education and reconciliation in how we address our history. This discourse forces us to confront the values we choose to honor and the narratives we choose to amplify and is pivotal in reconciling our past and forging a path forward that embraces a more inclusive narrative.

Voting trends

American Values Coalition did a deep dive into recent shifts in the political allegiance of non-white voters. These shifts underscore the imperative for political parties to better engage with and understand the diverse communities that constitute the American mosaic. Differences in religiosity within the Democratic coalition, which includes a significant number of areligious and religiously diverse voters, may contribute to these changes, underscoring the complex interplay between race, religion, and political alignment. This acknowledgment again ties back to Stephan's reminder that faith-based efforts to combat racism and strengthen democracy have enormous potential to "instill hope and rejuvenate religious imagination for drawing us closer to the Beloved Community."

DEI critiques

The critique of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in education underscores the necessity of genuine engagement with diversity as a cornerstone of democratic vitality. These initiatives, when thoughtfully applied, can bridge divides and enrich our collective understanding. Together, these discussions illuminate the complexity of our shared history and the ongoing effort to craft a democracy that truly reflects the richness of our diverse nation.

A unified path forward

The success of a multiracial democracy depends not on avoiding tough conversations but embracing them. It relies on our ability to transcend divisions and build a future grounded in diversity, equity, and collective impact. The path forward is fraught with challenges, yet it is filled with opportunities for those willing to engage in the hard work of building bridges rather than walls. By confronting systemic racism, reevaluating our historical narratives, combating misinformation, and fostering inclusive dialogues, we demonstrate our collective resolve. We stand on the cusp of redefining what a vibrant, inclusive democracy looks like—an endeavor not just possible but essential for the future of our nation.

Read More

Barbershops Are Helping Black Boys See Themselves as Readers

One of the barbershops participating in the Barbershop Books program.

Photo courtesy of Alvin Irby

Barbershops Are Helping Black Boys See Themselves as Readers

Barbershop Books, an organization whose award‑winning literacy programs celebrate, amplify, and affirm the interests of Black boys while inspiring kids to read for fun, has spent more than a decade transforming everyday community spaces into joyful reading hubs. That mission was on full display this Martin Luther King Jr. Day, when the organization partnered with a neighborhood barbershop in the Bronx—Flava In Ya Hair—to offer free haircuts and free children’s books to local families.

As families examined stacks of Dog Man, Fly Guy, Captain Underpants, and Diary of a Wimpy Kid, barbershop owner Patrick shared that growing up, reading was associated with negative school experiences and used as a punishment at home. “Go in your room and read!” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
We Can’t Let Hegseth Win His War on Women

We Can’t Let Hegseth Win His War on Women

When Hegseth ordered all top brass to assemble in Quantico in September, he declared women could either meet male standards for combat roles or get cut. Strong message, except the military was already doing that, so Hegseth was either oblivious or ignoring decades of history. Confusion aside, it reaffirmed a goal Hegseth has made clear since his Fox News days, when he said, “I'm straight up saying we should not have women in combat roles.” Now, as of January 6th, the Pentagon is planning a six-month review of women in ground combat jobs. It may come as no surprise, but this thinly veiled anti-woman agenda has no tactical security advantage.

When integrating women into combat roles was brought to Congress in 1993, a summary of findings submitted that, “although logical, such a policy would [erode] the civilizing notion that men should protect . . . women.” Archaic notions of the patriarchy almost outweighed logic; instead, luckily, as combat roles have become available to them, more and more women are now serving, increasing military readiness. As it turns out, women are highly effective in combat. Khris Fuhr, a West Point graduate who worked on gender integration at Army Forces Command, calls this new review "a solution for a problem that doesn't exist." She says an Army study between 2018 to 2023 showed women didn’t just perform well in ground combat units but sometimes scored even better than their male counterparts.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women holding signs to defend diversity at Havard

Harvard students joined in a rally protesting the Supreme Courts ruling against affirmative action in 2023.

Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

Diversity Has Become a Dirty Word. It Doesn’t Have to Be.

I have an identical twin sister. Although our faces can unlock each other’s iPhones, even the two of us are not exactly the same. If identical twins can differ, wouldn’t most people be different too? Why is diversity considered a bad word?

Like me, my twin sister is in computing, yet we are unique in many ways. She works in industry, while I am in academia. She’s allergic to guinea pigs, while I had pet guinea pigs (yep, that’s how she found out). Even our voices aren’t the same. As a kid, I was definitely the chattier one, while she loved taking walks together in silence (which, of course, drove me crazy).

Keep ReadingShow less
DEI Dilemma? Start Building Community within Your Organization

Team of male and female entrepreneurs working on computers at office

Getty Images

DEI Dilemma? Start Building Community within Your Organization

Amid the pushback to DEI, an essential truth often gets lost: You have agency over how you approach building diversity, equity, and inclusion into your organization.

No executive order or unhinged rant can change that.

Keep ReadingShow less