Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Banned Books Damn Our Children's Future

Opinion

Banned Books Damn Our Children's Future

Two children reading in school.

Getty Images, Jim Craigmyle

April 2nd is International Children's Book Day. It is time to celebrate the transformative power of children's literature and mourn the spaces where stories once lived. The numbers are staggering: there were over 10,000 book bans in U.S. public schools during the 2023-2024 school year alone, affecting more than 4,000 unique titles. Each banned book represents a mirror taken away from a child who might have seen themselves in those pages or a window closed to a child who might have glimpsed a world beyond their own.

I'm a child of the 80s and 90s, back when PBS was basically raising us all. Man, LeVar Burton's voice on Reading Rainbow was like that cool uncle who always knew exactly what book you needed. Remember him saying, "But you don't have to take my word for it"? And Sesame Street—that show was living proof that a kid from the Bronx could learn alongside a kid from rural Kansas, no questions asked. These and other such programs convinced an entire generation that we could "go anywhere" and "be anything.” Also, they were declarations that every child deserves to see themselves in stories, to dream in technicolor, and to imagine futures unlimited by the accidents of birth or circumstance.


Let me tell you something I've learned from years of working with kids, both as a parent and a pastor: magic happens when children find "their" book. You can literally see it. When my students discover characters who share their experiences—their joys, struggles, family structures, and cultural celebrations—their demeanor changes. Their backs and shoulders straighten. Their voices grow more vigorous. They begin to understand that their stories matter and that they belong in the grand narrative of human experience.

Hans Christian Andersen, whose birthday we honor on International Children's Book Day, once wrote, "Life itself is the most wonderful fairy tale." But here's the million-dollar question: whose fairy tales are we determining worthy of shelf space? The answer to that isn't just about books—it's about who we want to be as a society.

This year's theme, "The Freedom of Imagination," feels less like a party and more like a battle cry. And honestly? It should. We're standing at a crossroads, and the path we choose now is going to echo for generations.

To those who defend banning books under the guise of "protection," I ask: what are we protecting our children from? Is it from the knowledge that their classmate has two moms? Do they understand that some of their friends celebrate different holidays? The realization that courage and kindness come in all colors? Give me a break. Real protection means giving kids the tools to understand their world—all of it.

International Children's Book Day reminds us that literacy is more than the ability to decode words on a page. True literacy is the capacity to read the world in all its complex beauty, to recognize oneself in stories, and to develop empathy for experiences unlike our own. That's what really scares the book banners—not that children will be corrupted but that they'll start thinking for themselves.

As our son grows, I reflect on the legacy we're leaving him and all children and youth who are just beginning their journey. Will they find themselves in the pages of their school libraries? Will they see their experiences, their joy, and their unlimited potential reflected in the books they encounter? Children deserve to see themselves as heroes, scientists, artists, leaders, and dreamers. They deserve to know that their stories, their lives, and their futures matter. It must be celebrated, protected, and expanded.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practitioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

Liberty and Justice for Some

Stephanie Toliver examines book bans, transgender rights in Kansas, the impacts of ICE detentions, and the history of conditional equality in America’s schools, libraries, and churches.

Getty Images, Catherine McQueen

Liberty and Justice for Some

Late February brought two stories that most Americans filed under separate categories. In Kansas, the state government invalidated the driver's licenses and birth certificates of transgender residents, erasing legal identities with the stroke of a pen. In New York, a Columbia University neuroscience student named Ellie Aghayeva was taken from her campus apartment by federal agents who misrepresented themselves to get through the door and held by ICE until the city's mayor personally petitioned for her release. Different people, different states, different mechanisms. The same message: for some of us, the promises of this nation were always conditional.

And yet, many Americans hold onto the lie of equality because acknowledging the truth would mean that the foundational promise we have repeated since childhood — liberty and justice for all — was never meant for all of us. It is far easier to accept comfortable fictions than to reckon with a truth that destabilizes everything you thought you knew. That meritocracy is real. That all are equal. That the documents we carry and the institutions we enter will protect us the same way they protect everyone else. But for many of us, there was never a fiction to hold onto. We were born into the conditions the lie was designed to obscure.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two individuals Skiing in the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Paralympic Games.

Oksana Masters of Team United States celebrates after winning gold in the Para Cross Country Skiing Sprint Sitting Final on day four of the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Paralympic Games at Tesero Cross-Country Skiing Stadium on March 10, 2026 in Val di Fiemme, Italy.

Getty Images, Buda Mendes

The Paralympics Challenge Everything We Think We Know About Sports

If you’re a sports fan, you likely watched coverage of the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milano Cortina. But will you watch the Paralympics when approximately 665 athletes are expected in Italy to compete in the Para sports of alpine skiing, biathlon, cross-country skiing, ice hockey, snowboarding, and wheelchair curling?

The Paralympics, so-called because they are “parallel” to the Olympics, stand alone as the globe’s premier sporting event for elite athletes with disabilities. According to the International Paralympic Committee, 4,400 disabled athletes competed in the 2024 Paris Summer Games in track and field, swimming, and twenty other sports.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change

Claiming Contested Values

FrameWorks Institute

How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change

Claiming Contested Values: How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change, produced by the FrameWorks Institute, explores how widely shared yet politically contested values can be used to strengthen public support for systemic reform. Values are central to how advocates communicate the importance of their work, and they can motivate collective action toward big, structural changes. This has become especially urgent in a climate where executive orders are targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, and some nonprofits are being labeled as threats based on their stated missions. Many civil society organizations are now grappling with how to communicate their values effectively and safely.

The report focuses on Fairness, Stability, and Freedom because they resonate across the U.S. public and are used by communicators across the political spectrum. Unlike values more closely associated with one ideological camp — such as Tradition on the right or Solidarity on the left — these three values are broadly recognizable but highly contested. Each contains multiple variants, and their impact depends on how clearly advocates define them and how they are paired with specific issues.

Keep ReadingShow less