Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s "anti-" rhetoric answer to great replacement theory

Trump’s "anti-" rhetoric answer to great replacement theory

Several blocks spaced out.

Getty Images / Sakchai Vongsasiripat

The Fulcrum’s Executive Director Hugo Balta, whose social media platform exhibits highly factual and credibility ratings from the Media Bias/Fact Check, recently wrote in an op-ed, “This is the time to advance on DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion] initiatives,” as opposed to President Trump and Elon Musk’s anti-DEI movement.

Let’s explore Mr. Balta’s contention from a research-based and reference-laden perspective to see if his position is true or false.


First, Mr. Trump issued “a sweeping executive order directing federal agencies to terminate DEI programs,” reported Reuters on January 24. Next, on January 27, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced that DEI endeavors at the Pentagon, with about 27,000 employees, would also be eliminated.

The Reuters article noted if companies comply with Trump’s anti-DEI executive order, they are “exposing themselves to more discrimination lawsuits by workers.” Companies that abandon DEI policies are specifically violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That law prohibits employment discrimination based on race, sex, religion, color, and national origin.

Alan Blinder, former vice chair of the Federal Reserve and economics professor at Princeton University, scolded Trump for his “attacks on DEI and affirmative action” in his January 28 Wall Street Journal op-ed. Every company and educational institution that depends on federal funding or holds government contracts is in jeopardy with Trump’s edict.

On January 27, the Wall Street Journal countered Trump’s anti-DEI and anti-affirmative action order by stating, in a rather blunt manner, that “discrimination in hiring isn’t allowed.” Mr. Trump has, for many years, also veered into the anti-woke world, which means he discounts the value of social justice, equal rights, and equal opportunity.

Jessica Guynn, a journalist for USA Today, made three observations about the new administration in her January 26 column. First, Trump’s anti-DEI initiative “began in earnest during Trump’s first term and grew after he left office.” Secondly, Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy, “has filed dozens of legal actions against woke corporations.” Finally, Miller praises Harmeet Dhillon, Trump’s lawyer to lead the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, for “suing corporations who use woke policies to discriminate against their workers.”

A November 4, 2024 article in Bloomberg Law speculates some Republicans and Trump’s anti-DEI, anti-woke, and anti-affirmative action stances are a direct reaction to the “Great Replacement Theory”? This white nationalist far-right conspiracy theory preaches that “racial minorities are displacing the traditional white American population and taking control of the nation. Versions of the theory have become commonplace in the Republican Party of the United States and have become a major issue of political debate,” according to a New York Times piece published on May 15, 2022.

A May 2022 poll by Yahoo! News and YouGov found that 61 percent of people who voted for Trump in 2020 agree with the core tenet of the great replacement theory that “a group of people in this country are trying to replace native-born Americans with immigrants and people of color who share their political views.”

Regarding immigration, Alan Blinder wrote in the Wall Street Journal, “Reducing illegal immigration has been a perplexing problem for decades, has bipartisan support and began happening in the Biden administration.” In Trump’s first term, he expelled 2,011,280 undocumented migrants, as compared to Biden deporting 4,677,460 undocumented migrants as of July 2024, according to Newsweek.

Related to the great replacement theory, an official with the U.S. Air Force confirmed to USA Today on January 25—the end of Donald Trump’s first week of office—that: “The U.S. Air Force will no longer teach its recruits about the Tuskegee Airmen, the more than 15,000 Black pilots (first Black aviators), mechanics, and cooks in the segregated Army of World War II.”

Trump’s edict is viewed as an attempt to erase the history of active Black fighters from 1940 to 1952, who flew in over 15,000 sorties and destroyed more than 100 German aircraft. Trump’s action is reminiscent of George Orwell’s “1984” dystopian novel whereby Big Brother eliminated history he didn’t like.

It gets worse about members of the great replacement theory cult. Joseph Uscinski and Casey Klofstad, political science professors at the University of Miami, found in their research that “those who believed in these conspiracy theories were also more likely to believe in other conspiracy theories and to be supportive of violence as a means to political ends.” January 6, 2021 anyone?

Research is replete that Hugo Balta’s assertion that now is the time to advance—versus retreat —DEI endeavors, is spot on. The same advancement should occur for social justice, equal rights, equal opportunity, and employment discrimination based upon race, sex, religion, color, and national origin.

Request your congressional delegates to uphold the Civil Rights Act that we’ve embraced since 1964 and to reject the anti-DEI, anti-woke, and anti-affirmative action endeavors that may be in play to solve the great replacement conspiracy theory.

Steve Corbin is a professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.


Read More

Barbershops Are Helping Black Boys See Themselves as Readers

One of the barbershops participating in the Barbershop Books program.

Photo courtesy of Alvin Irby

Barbershops Are Helping Black Boys See Themselves as Readers

Barbershop Books, an organization whose award‑winning literacy programs celebrate, amplify, and affirm the interests of Black boys while inspiring kids to read for fun, has spent more than a decade transforming everyday community spaces into joyful reading hubs. That mission was on full display this Martin Luther King Jr. Day, when the organization partnered with a neighborhood barbershop in the Bronx—Flava In Ya Hair—to offer free haircuts and free children’s books to local families.

As families examined stacks of Dog Man, Fly Guy, Captain Underpants, and Diary of a Wimpy Kid, barbershop owner Patrick shared that growing up, reading was associated with negative school experiences and used as a punishment at home. “Go in your room and read!” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
We Can’t Let Hegseth Win His War on Women

We Can’t Let Hegseth Win His War on Women

When Hegseth ordered all top brass to assemble in Quantico in September, he declared women could either meet male standards for combat roles or get cut. Strong message, except the military was already doing that, so Hegseth was either oblivious or ignoring decades of history. Confusion aside, it reaffirmed a goal Hegseth has made clear since his Fox News days, when he said, “I'm straight up saying we should not have women in combat roles.” Now, as of January 6th, the Pentagon is planning a six-month review of women in ground combat jobs. It may come as no surprise, but this thinly veiled anti-woman agenda has no tactical security advantage.

When integrating women into combat roles was brought to Congress in 1993, a summary of findings submitted that, “although logical, such a policy would [erode] the civilizing notion that men should protect . . . women.” Archaic notions of the patriarchy almost outweighed logic; instead, luckily, as combat roles have become available to them, more and more women are now serving, increasing military readiness. As it turns out, women are highly effective in combat. Khris Fuhr, a West Point graduate who worked on gender integration at Army Forces Command, calls this new review "a solution for a problem that doesn't exist." She says an Army study between 2018 to 2023 showed women didn’t just perform well in ground combat units but sometimes scored even better than their male counterparts.

Keep ReadingShow less
Women holding signs to defend diversity at Havard

Harvard students joined in a rally protesting the Supreme Courts ruling against affirmative action in 2023.

Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

Diversity Has Become a Dirty Word. It Doesn’t Have to Be.

I have an identical twin sister. Although our faces can unlock each other’s iPhones, even the two of us are not exactly the same. If identical twins can differ, wouldn’t most people be different too? Why is diversity considered a bad word?

Like me, my twin sister is in computing, yet we are unique in many ways. She works in industry, while I am in academia. She’s allergic to guinea pigs, while I had pet guinea pigs (yep, that’s how she found out). Even our voices aren’t the same. As a kid, I was definitely the chattier one, while she loved taking walks together in silence (which, of course, drove me crazy).

Keep ReadingShow less
DEI Dilemma? Start Building Community within Your Organization

Team of male and female entrepreneurs working on computers at office

Getty Images

DEI Dilemma? Start Building Community within Your Organization

Amid the pushback to DEI, an essential truth often gets lost: You have agency over how you approach building diversity, equity, and inclusion into your organization.

No executive order or unhinged rant can change that.

Keep ReadingShow less