Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump’s "anti-" rhetoric answer to great replacement theory

Trump’s "anti-" rhetoric answer to great replacement theory

Several blocks spaced out.

Getty Images / Sakchai Vongsasiripat

The Fulcrum’s Executive Director Hugo Balta, whose social media platform exhibits highly factual and credibility ratings from the Media Bias/Fact Check, recently wrote in an op-ed, “This is the time to advance on DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion] initiatives,” as opposed to President Trump and Elon Musk’s anti-DEI movement.

Let’s explore Mr. Balta’s contention from a research-based and reference-laden perspective to see if his position is true or false.


First, Mr. Trump issued “a sweeping executive order directing federal agencies to terminate DEI programs,” reported Reuters on January 24. Next, on January 27, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced that DEI endeavors at the Pentagon, with about 27,000 employees, would also be eliminated.

The Reuters article noted if companies comply with Trump’s anti-DEI executive order, they are “exposing themselves to more discrimination lawsuits by workers.” Companies that abandon DEI policies are specifically violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That law prohibits employment discrimination based on race, sex, religion, color, and national origin.

Alan Blinder, former vice chair of the Federal Reserve and economics professor at Princeton University, scolded Trump for his “attacks on DEI and affirmative action” in his January 28 Wall Street Journal op-ed. Every company and educational institution that depends on federal funding or holds government contracts is in jeopardy with Trump’s edict.

On January 27, the Wall Street Journal countered Trump’s anti-DEI and anti-affirmative action order by stating, in a rather blunt manner, that “discrimination in hiring isn’t allowed.” Mr. Trump has, for many years, also veered into the anti-woke world, which means he discounts the value of social justice, equal rights, and equal opportunity.

Jessica Guynn, a journalist for USA Today, made three observations about the new administration in her January 26 column. First, Trump’s anti-DEI initiative “began in earnest during Trump’s first term and grew after he left office.” Secondly, Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy, “has filed dozens of legal actions against woke corporations.” Finally, Miller praises Harmeet Dhillon, Trump’s lawyer to lead the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, for “suing corporations who use woke policies to discriminate against their workers.”

A November 4, 2024 article in Bloomberg Law speculates some Republicans and Trump’s anti-DEI, anti-woke, and anti-affirmative action stances are a direct reaction to the “Great Replacement Theory”? This white nationalist far-right conspiracy theory preaches that “racial minorities are displacing the traditional white American population and taking control of the nation. Versions of the theory have become commonplace in the Republican Party of the United States and have become a major issue of political debate,” according to a New York Times piece published on May 15, 2022.

A May 2022 poll by Yahoo! News and YouGov found that 61 percent of people who voted for Trump in 2020 agree with the core tenet of the great replacement theory that “a group of people in this country are trying to replace native-born Americans with immigrants and people of color who share their political views.”

Regarding immigration, Alan Blinder wrote in the Wall Street Journal, “Reducing illegal immigration has been a perplexing problem for decades, has bipartisan support and began happening in the Biden administration.” In Trump’s first term, he expelled 2,011,280 undocumented migrants, as compared to Biden deporting 4,677,460 undocumented migrants as of July 2024, according to Newsweek.

Related to the great replacement theory, an official with the U.S. Air Force confirmed to USA Today on January 25—the end of Donald Trump’s first week of office—that: “The U.S. Air Force will no longer teach its recruits about the Tuskegee Airmen, the more than 15,000 Black pilots (first Black aviators), mechanics, and cooks in the segregated Army of World War II.”

Trump’s edict is viewed as an attempt to erase the history of active Black fighters from 1940 to 1952, who flew in over 15,000 sorties and destroyed more than 100 German aircraft. Trump’s action is reminiscent of George Orwell’s “1984” dystopian novel whereby Big Brother eliminated history he didn’t like.

It gets worse about members of the great replacement theory cult. Joseph Uscinski and Casey Klofstad, political science professors at the University of Miami, found in their research that “those who believed in these conspiracy theories were also more likely to believe in other conspiracy theories and to be supportive of violence as a means to political ends.” January 6, 2021 anyone?

Research is replete that Hugo Balta’s assertion that now is the time to advance—versus retreat —DEI endeavors, is spot on. The same advancement should occur for social justice, equal rights, equal opportunity, and employment discrimination based upon race, sex, religion, color, and national origin.

Request your congressional delegates to uphold the Civil Rights Act that we’ve embraced since 1964 and to reject the anti-DEI, anti-woke, and anti-affirmative action endeavors that may be in play to solve the great replacement conspiracy theory.

Steve Corbin is a professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

Read More

Fulcrum Roundtable: June Rewind
stainless steel road sign
Photo by Miko Guziuk on Unsplash

Fulcrum Roundtable: June Rewind

Welcome to the Fulcrum Roundtable, formerly known as Democracy in Action, where you will find insights and discussions with Fulcrum's collaborators on some of the most talked-about topics.

Consistent with the Fulcrum's mission, this program aims to share diverse perspectives to broaden our readers' viewpoints.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Promise in the Making: Thirty-Five Years of the ADA

Americans with Disabilities Act ADA and glasses.

Getty Images

A Promise in the Making: Thirty-Five Years of the ADA

One July morning in 1990, a crowd gathered on the White House lawn, some in wheelchairs, others holding signs, many with tears in their eyes. President George H.W. Bush lifted his pen and signed his name to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)—the most sweeping civil rights law for people with disabilities in the nation's history. It was a moment three decades in the making: a rare convergence of activism, outrage, and legislative will. The ADA's promise was simple—no longer would disability mean exclusion from public life—but its implications were anything but.

Thirty-five years later, the ADA remains a landmark, a legal bulwark against discrimination, and a symbol of hard-won visibility for a community that has been too often relegated to the margins. Yet, like every civil rights law, the ADA's story is more complex than a single signature or a morning in Washington. Its passage and its legacy have always been about more than ramps and regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Illinois Camp Gives Underrepresented Kids an Opportunity To Explore New Pathways

Kuumba Family Festival at Evanston Township High School

Illinois Camp Gives Underrepresented Kids an Opportunity To Explore New Pathways

Summer camps in Evanston, Illinois — a quiet suburb just north of Chicago — usually consist of an array of different sports, educational programs, and even learning how to sail. But one thing is obviously apparent throughout the city’s camps: they’re almost all white.

Despite Black or African American families making up nearly 16% of Evanston’s population, Black kids are massively underrepresented throughout the city's summer camps.

Keep ReadingShow less
Students in a classroom.​

Today, Hispanic-Serving Institutions enroll 64 percent of all Latino college students.

Getty Images, andresr

Tennessee’s Attack on Federal Support for Hispanic-Serving Colleges Hurts Us All

The Tennessee Attorney General has partnered with a conservative legal nonprofit to sue the U.S. Department of Education over programming that supports Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs), colleges, and universities where at least 25% of the undergraduate full-time equivalent student enrollment is Hispanic. On its face, this action claims to oppose “discriminatory” federal funding. In reality, it is part of a broader and deeply troubling trend: a coordinated effort to dismantle educational opportunity for communities of color under the guise of anti-DEI rhetoric.

As a scholar of educational policy and leadership in higher education, I believe we must confront policies that narrow access and undermine equity in education for those who have been historically underserved. What is happening in Tennessee is not just a misguided action—it’s a self-inflicted wound that will harm the state's economic future and deepen historical inequality.

Keep ReadingShow less