Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s "anti-" rhetoric answer to great replacement theory

Trump’s "anti-" rhetoric answer to great replacement theory

Several blocks spaced out.

Getty Images / Sakchai Vongsasiripat

The Fulcrum’s Executive Director Hugo Balta, whose social media platform exhibits highly factual and credibility ratings from the Media Bias/Fact Check, recently wrote in an op-ed, “This is the time to advance on DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion] initiatives,” as opposed to President Trump and Elon Musk’s anti-DEI movement.

Let’s explore Mr. Balta’s contention from a research-based and reference-laden perspective to see if his position is true or false.


First, Mr. Trump issued “a sweeping executive order directing federal agencies to terminate DEI programs,” reported Reuters on January 24. Next, on January 27, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced that DEI endeavors at the Pentagon, with about 27,000 employees, would also be eliminated.

The Reuters article noted if companies comply with Trump’s anti-DEI executive order, they are “exposing themselves to more discrimination lawsuits by workers.” Companies that abandon DEI policies are specifically violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That law prohibits employment discrimination based on race, sex, religion, color, and national origin.

Alan Blinder, former vice chair of the Federal Reserve and economics professor at Princeton University, scolded Trump for his “attacks on DEI and affirmative action” in his January 28 Wall Street Journal op-ed. Every company and educational institution that depends on federal funding or holds government contracts is in jeopardy with Trump’s edict.

On January 27, the Wall Street Journal countered Trump’s anti-DEI and anti-affirmative action order by stating, in a rather blunt manner, that “discrimination in hiring isn’t allowed.” Mr. Trump has, for many years, also veered into the anti-woke world, which means he discounts the value of social justice, equal rights, and equal opportunity.

Jessica Guynn, a journalist for USA Today, made three observations about the new administration in her January 26 column. First, Trump’s anti-DEI initiative “began in earnest during Trump’s first term and grew after he left office.” Secondly, Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy, “has filed dozens of legal actions against woke corporations.” Finally, Miller praises Harmeet Dhillon, Trump’s lawyer to lead the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, for “suing corporations who use woke policies to discriminate against their workers.”

A November 4, 2024 article in Bloomberg Law speculates some Republicans and Trump’s anti-DEI, anti-woke, and anti-affirmative action stances are a direct reaction to the “Great Replacement Theory”? This white nationalist far-right conspiracy theory preaches that “racial minorities are displacing the traditional white American population and taking control of the nation. Versions of the theory have become commonplace in the Republican Party of the United States and have become a major issue of political debate,” according to a New York Times piece published on May 15, 2022.

A May 2022 poll by Yahoo! News and YouGov found that 61 percent of people who voted for Trump in 2020 agree with the core tenet of the great replacement theory that “a group of people in this country are trying to replace native-born Americans with immigrants and people of color who share their political views.”

Regarding immigration, Alan Blinder wrote in the Wall Street Journal, “Reducing illegal immigration has been a perplexing problem for decades, has bipartisan support and began happening in the Biden administration.” In Trump’s first term, he expelled 2,011,280 undocumented migrants, as compared to Biden deporting 4,677,460 undocumented migrants as of July 2024, according to Newsweek.

Related to the great replacement theory, an official with the U.S. Air Force confirmed to USA Today on January 25—the end of Donald Trump’s first week of office—that: “The U.S. Air Force will no longer teach its recruits about the Tuskegee Airmen, the more than 15,000 Black pilots (first Black aviators), mechanics, and cooks in the segregated Army of World War II.”

Trump’s edict is viewed as an attempt to erase the history of active Black fighters from 1940 to 1952, who flew in over 15,000 sorties and destroyed more than 100 German aircraft. Trump’s action is reminiscent of George Orwell’s “1984” dystopian novel whereby Big Brother eliminated history he didn’t like.

It gets worse about members of the great replacement theory cult. Joseph Uscinski and Casey Klofstad, political science professors at the University of Miami, found in their research that “those who believed in these conspiracy theories were also more likely to believe in other conspiracy theories and to be supportive of violence as a means to political ends.” January 6, 2021 anyone?

Research is replete that Hugo Balta’s assertion that now is the time to advance—versus retreat —DEI endeavors, is spot on. The same advancement should occur for social justice, equal rights, equal opportunity, and employment discrimination based upon race, sex, religion, color, and national origin.

Request your congressional delegates to uphold the Civil Rights Act that we’ve embraced since 1964 and to reject the anti-DEI, anti-woke, and anti-affirmative action endeavors that may be in play to solve the great replacement conspiracy theory.

Steve Corbin is a professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.


Read More

America at 250: Patriotic Lament From Her Darker Sons

As the United States nears its 250th anniversary, Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson explores the nation’s founding contradictions, enduring racial inequalities, and the ongoing struggle to align democratic ideals with reality.

Getty Images

America at 250: Patriotic Lament From Her Darker Sons

As the United States approaches its 250th birthday, the nation confronts a moment that should stir both celebration and sober reflection. A quarter millennium is no small achievement in the long arc of human governance. Republics have faltered far sooner. Yet anniversaries, especially ones of this magnitude, are not merely commemorations of survival. These observances are invitations to take inventory. Thus, demanding that we ask not only what we have built, but what we have become.

The American story is told in two intertwined registers. One is triumphant: a daring rebellion reshaping political thought, expanding liberty. The other is quieter and often suppressed: a republic professing universal rights while sanctioning human bondage, preaching equality but benefiting only a select few. In our 250th year, we are invited to see these two narratives as inseparable, each shaping and challenging the other.

Keep ReadingShow less
Liberty and Justice for Some

Stephanie Toliver examines book bans, transgender rights in Kansas, the impacts of ICE detentions, and the history of conditional equality in America’s schools, libraries, and churches.

Getty Images, Catherine McQueen

Liberty and Justice for Some

Late February brought two stories that most Americans filed under separate categories. In Kansas, the state government invalidated the driver's licenses and birth certificates of transgender residents, erasing legal identities with the stroke of a pen. In New York, a Columbia University neuroscience student named Ellie Aghayeva was taken from her campus apartment by federal agents who misrepresented themselves to get through the door and held by ICE until the city's mayor personally petitioned for her release. Different people, different states, different mechanisms. The same message: for some of us, the promises of this nation were always conditional.

And yet, many Americans hold onto the lie of equality because acknowledging the truth would mean that the foundational promise we have repeated since childhood — liberty and justice for all — was never meant for all of us. It is far easier to accept comfortable fictions than to reckon with a truth that destabilizes everything you thought you knew. That meritocracy is real. That all are equal. That the documents we carry and the institutions we enter will protect us the same way they protect everyone else. But for many of us, there was never a fiction to hold onto. We were born into the conditions the lie was designed to obscure.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two individuals Skiing in the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Paralympic Games.

Oksana Masters of Team United States celebrates after winning gold in the Para Cross Country Skiing Sprint Sitting Final on day four of the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Paralympic Games at Tesero Cross-Country Skiing Stadium on March 10, 2026 in Val di Fiemme, Italy.

Getty Images, Buda Mendes

The Paralympics Challenge Everything We Think We Know About Sports

If you’re a sports fan, you likely watched coverage of the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milano Cortina. But will you watch the Paralympics when approximately 665 athletes are expected in Italy to compete in the Para sports of alpine skiing, biathlon, cross-country skiing, ice hockey, snowboarding, and wheelchair curling?

The Paralympics, so-called because they are “parallel” to the Olympics, stand alone as the globe’s premier sporting event for elite athletes with disabilities. According to the International Paralympic Committee, 4,400 disabled athletes competed in the 2024 Paris Summer Games in track and field, swimming, and twenty other sports.

Keep ReadingShow less