Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Liberation Through the Womanist Perspective

Opinion

Liberation Through the Womanist Perspective

Two people reaching out for another.

Getty Images, Hiraman

Women's History Month finds us at a critical crossroads. Nearly three-quarters of the world's population faces increasing backlash against women's rights, while technological disruption and economic uncertainty threaten to deepen existing inequalities. Yet, within this challenging landscape lies an opportunity to radically reimagine our approach to gender equality through a womanist theological lens.

Womanist, a methodological approach centering on the experiences and perspectives of Black women, offers profound insights for diverse girls and women everywhere. It teaches us that liberation cannot be compartmentalized—the struggle for gender equality must be understood within the broader matrix of racial justice, economic empowerment, and spiritual transformation.


Womanist perspective, according to theologian Emilie Townes, is best described as "radical subjectivity," which is the courage to name one's reality and claim one's voice. In our current context, this means acknowledging that traditional avenues for women's advancement remain narrow, particularly for women of color and those at society's margins. The World Bank's projection that closing gender gaps in employment and entrepreneurship could increase global GDP by 20% tells only part of the story. The fuller truth lies in understanding how systems of oppression intersect and reinforce each other.

A womanist hermeneutic demands we look beyond surface-level solutions. While corporate diversity initiatives and political representation matter, progress requires addressing the more profound spiritual and cultural foundations perpetuating inequality. Womanist theology locates themes of God's liberation, justice, and freedom in biblical narratives but crucially roots from the liberation in the self-empowerment of marginalized communities. Unfortunately, our world devalues women's worth, particularly women of color, and claiming one's divine dignity becomes an act of resistance. This isn't mere self-help rhetoric. Instead, it's about recognizing that personal transformation and structural change are intimately connected.

Also, matriarchal activism emphasizes "traditional communalism," understanding that liberation is inherently a collective responsibility and benefit. Global challenges, ranging from democratic decay to economic instability, necessitate building robust solidarity networks.

Moreover, Theologian and Professor Delores Williams calls for "critical engagement" of religious traditions and contemporary institutions—which means questioning theological interpretations that are used to justify women's subordination while also challenging secular systems that perpetuate inequality under the guise of progress.

While artificial intelligence and automation risk exacerbating gender disparities, they also offer tools for amplifying marginalized voices and creating new pathways for economic empowerment. The key lies in ensuring these technologies are developed and deployed with an explicit commitment to equity and justice. Similarly, current political and economic upheavals call for a womanist response that goes beyond conventional policy solutions. When women participate in existing systems, they often find narrow avenues for advancement. Womanism encourages imagining new political and economic organization forms that center the experiences of those most impacted by multiple forms of oppression.

For example, Joy Reid consistently reminds us that women of color, in particular, have long been at the forefront of transformative social change, often serving as exemplars in each space they occupy, despite facing intersecting barriers. This reality calls us to recognize that accelerating progress toward gender equality requires not just removing obstacles but actively centering the leadership and wisdom of those who have been historically marginalized. From my peripheral perspective, the womanist vision for gender equality demands movement beyond incremental changes to pursue transformative justice. Thus, we must address visible manifestations of inequality and the deeper spiritual and cultural narratives that sustain them. It means recognizing that gender equality is inseparable from racial, economic, and environmental justice.

Woman-centered advocacy operates with "strategic hope." Strategic hope is neither naive optimism nor passive waiting but rather an active commitment to creating the world we envision. While current statistics suggest we are still 134 years away from global gender parity, a womanist perspective champions that transformation happens unexpectedly and through unforeseen agents.

May this Women's History Month accelerate progress toward greater equity through significant policy reformation, strategic solutions, and a fundamental reimagining of what liberation means and what it achieves. Womanist tradition teaches us that transformation is a promise—not despite our current challenges but through our collective response.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practitioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep ReadingShow less