Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Liberation Through the Womanist Perspective

Opinion

Liberation Through the Womanist Perspective

Two people reaching out for another.

Getty Images, Hiraman

Women's History Month finds us at a critical crossroads. Nearly three-quarters of the world's population faces increasing backlash against women's rights, while technological disruption and economic uncertainty threaten to deepen existing inequalities. Yet, within this challenging landscape lies an opportunity to radically reimagine our approach to gender equality through a womanist theological lens.

Womanist, a methodological approach centering on the experiences and perspectives of Black women, offers profound insights for diverse girls and women everywhere. It teaches us that liberation cannot be compartmentalized—the struggle for gender equality must be understood within the broader matrix of racial justice, economic empowerment, and spiritual transformation.


Womanist perspective, according to theologian Emilie Townes, is best described as "radical subjectivity," which is the courage to name one's reality and claim one's voice. In our current context, this means acknowledging that traditional avenues for women's advancement remain narrow, particularly for women of color and those at society's margins. The World Bank's projection that closing gender gaps in employment and entrepreneurship could increase global GDP by 20% tells only part of the story. The fuller truth lies in understanding how systems of oppression intersect and reinforce each other.

A womanist hermeneutic demands we look beyond surface-level solutions. While corporate diversity initiatives and political representation matter, progress requires addressing the more profound spiritual and cultural foundations perpetuating inequality. Womanist theology locates themes of God's liberation, justice, and freedom in biblical narratives but crucially roots from the liberation in the self-empowerment of marginalized communities. Unfortunately, our world devalues women's worth, particularly women of color, and claiming one's divine dignity becomes an act of resistance. This isn't mere self-help rhetoric. Instead, it's about recognizing that personal transformation and structural change are intimately connected.

Also, matriarchal activism emphasizes "traditional communalism," understanding that liberation is inherently a collective responsibility and benefit. Global challenges, ranging from democratic decay to economic instability, necessitate building robust solidarity networks.

Moreover, Theologian and Professor Delores Williams calls for "critical engagement" of religious traditions and contemporary institutions—which means questioning theological interpretations that are used to justify women's subordination while also challenging secular systems that perpetuate inequality under the guise of progress.

While artificial intelligence and automation risk exacerbating gender disparities, they also offer tools for amplifying marginalized voices and creating new pathways for economic empowerment. The key lies in ensuring these technologies are developed and deployed with an explicit commitment to equity and justice. Similarly, current political and economic upheavals call for a womanist response that goes beyond conventional policy solutions. When women participate in existing systems, they often find narrow avenues for advancement. Womanism encourages imagining new political and economic organization forms that center the experiences of those most impacted by multiple forms of oppression.

For example, Joy Reid consistently reminds us that women of color, in particular, have long been at the forefront of transformative social change, often serving as exemplars in each space they occupy, despite facing intersecting barriers. This reality calls us to recognize that accelerating progress toward gender equality requires not just removing obstacles but actively centering the leadership and wisdom of those who have been historically marginalized. From my peripheral perspective, the womanist vision for gender equality demands movement beyond incremental changes to pursue transformative justice. Thus, we must address visible manifestations of inequality and the deeper spiritual and cultural narratives that sustain them. It means recognizing that gender equality is inseparable from racial, economic, and environmental justice.

Woman-centered advocacy operates with "strategic hope." Strategic hope is neither naive optimism nor passive waiting but rather an active commitment to creating the world we envision. While current statistics suggest we are still 134 years away from global gender parity, a womanist perspective champions that transformation happens unexpectedly and through unforeseen agents.

May this Women's History Month accelerate progress toward greater equity through significant policy reformation, strategic solutions, and a fundamental reimagining of what liberation means and what it achieves. Womanist tradition teaches us that transformation is a promise—not despite our current challenges but through our collective response.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practitioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.


Read More

​Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer.

Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer arrives to the chambers of the U.S. House of Representatives ahead of President Trump's State of the Union address on February 24, 2026. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu/Getty Images)

Nathan Posner/Anadolu/Getty Images

In Two Months, Trump’s Cabinet Has Lost Three Women

President Donald Trump’s second Cabinet was never exceptionally diverse from the start. And in the past two months, three women have been fired or resigned.

The first to go, on March 5, was ex-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, the face of the Trump administration’s mass deportation agenda. Then, less than a month later, Trump ousted former Attorney General Pam Bondi. And on Monday, embattled Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer announced her resignation.

Keep ReadingShow less
American flag on a military uniform

Amid rising tensions with Iran, critics warn Trump-era military policies, discrimination, and leadership decisions are weakening U.S. readiness and national security.

adamkaz/Getty Images

Uncle Sam Wants You—Just Not Women or People of Color

As Trump’s War in Iran causes unprecedented global volatility, revealing significant weaknesses in our military, the President and his Secretary of War can’t seem to stop playing the politics of prejudice. A year ago, without explanation, Hegseth fired the first ever female Chief of Naval Operations and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a Black man. The latter was an F-16 pilot who once said in a recruitment commercial: “When I’m flying…You don’t know…whether I’m African American…You just know I’m an American Airman, kicking your butt.” Turns out when he wasn’t flying his boss figured out his race and kicked him off his post. Now, Hegseth has interfered with promotions for over a dozen Black and female senior officers across all branches, including blocking four outstanding Army officers–two Black men and two women–from becoming one-star generals. What was presented as "anti-woke" posturing is clearly little more than a thinly-veiled and targeted culture war. These racist, sexist, superficial “leaders” gotta go.

The war against wokeness is morally and strategically wrong, distracting us all from real missions. Instead of swiftly ending an ill-defined, illegal, indefinite war with Iran (that is not going well, to say the least) or addressing an ongoing manpower shortage, Hegseth went out of his way to unilaterally stop the advancement of four diverse officers with long careers of “exemplary service,” despite questionable legal authority to do so and against the counsel of the Secretary of the Army. Allegations of racial and gender bias are apropos, but it’s also just plain stupid. Roughly 43% of active duty troops are people of color while their leadership is overwhelmingly white, and women are leaving the military at a rate 28% higher than men. At a time when the military could use all the talent it can get, why is Hegseth keeping competent leaders from leading and disqualifying and disenfranchising over half the talent pool?

Keep ReadingShow less
America at 250: Patriotic Lament From Her Darker Sons

As the United States nears its 250th anniversary, Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson explores the nation’s founding contradictions, enduring racial inequalities, and the ongoing struggle to align democratic ideals with reality.

Getty Images

America at 250: Patriotic Lament From Her Darker Sons

As the United States approaches its 250th birthday, the nation confronts a moment that should stir both celebration and sober reflection. A quarter millennium is no small achievement in the long arc of human governance. Republics have faltered far sooner. Yet anniversaries, especially ones of this magnitude, are not merely commemorations of survival. These observances are invitations to take inventory. Thus, demanding that we ask not only what we have built, but what we have become.

The American story is told in two intertwined registers. One is triumphant: a daring rebellion reshaping political thought, expanding liberty. The other is quieter and often suppressed: a republic professing universal rights while sanctioning human bondage, preaching equality but benefiting only a select few. In our 250th year, we are invited to see these two narratives as inseparable, each shaping and challenging the other.

Keep ReadingShow less
Liberty and Justice for Some

Stephanie Toliver examines book bans, transgender rights in Kansas, the impacts of ICE detentions, and the history of conditional equality in America’s schools, libraries, and churches.

Getty Images, Catherine McQueen

Liberty and Justice for Some

Late February brought two stories that most Americans filed under separate categories. In Kansas, the state government invalidated the driver's licenses and birth certificates of transgender residents, erasing legal identities with the stroke of a pen. In New York, a Columbia University neuroscience student named Ellie Aghayeva was taken from her campus apartment by federal agents who misrepresented themselves to get through the door and held by ICE until the city's mayor personally petitioned for her release. Different people, different states, different mechanisms. The same message: for some of us, the promises of this nation were always conditional.

And yet, many Americans hold onto the lie of equality because acknowledging the truth would mean that the foundational promise we have repeated since childhood — liberty and justice for all — was never meant for all of us. It is far easier to accept comfortable fictions than to reckon with a truth that destabilizes everything you thought you knew. That meritocracy is real. That all are equal. That the documents we carry and the institutions we enter will protect us the same way they protect everyone else. But for many of us, there was never a fiction to hold onto. We were born into the conditions the lie was designed to obscure.

Keep ReadingShow less