Kazon Allen
Kazon Allen, a broadcast journalism student at Florida A&M University, said he hopes to grow into a more in‑depth storyteller with the power to inform the public and elevate voices that often go unheard. He explained that the Fulcrum Fellowship felt like a natural next step in his development as a journalist. “I applied to the fellowship to strengthen my journalism skills and continue growing as a storyteller. I’ve been studying communication and journalism from high school through college, and through this opportunity, I hope to advance my storytelling, gain new skills, and expand my opportunities as an upcoming journalist,” he said.
Shon Eric Hernandez
Shon Eric Hernandez, a journalism major at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, is interested in the intersections of media, politics, and entertainment. He said he is eager to deepen his understanding of solutions‑focused reporting—journalism that not only identifies problems but also examines how they can be addressed. “I want to move from critiquing media to practicing solutions‑focused reporting,” he said. “Through this experience, I hope to strengthen my investigative reporting, source‑building, and narrative skills so I can tell stories that critically examine problems and help readers become better informed and empowered.”
Daniela Mattson
Daniela Mattson, a journalism student at the University of Southern California, said she is eager to grow through mentorship from The Fulcrum’s editorial team and to further strengthen her reporting grounded in accuracy and ethics. "Through the fellowship, I hope to build meaningful connections with fellow student journalists and professional mentors who will push the boundaries of my storytelling and encourage me to do my best work," she said. "I look forward to being part of a community of journalists who understand and value the importance of ethical and impactful storytelling.”
Isabel Papp
Isabel Papp, a student at Northwestern University majoring in both journalism and political science, is a bilingual reporter who described herself as an “equity‑minded” storyteller committed to amplifying underrepresented voices and bringing cultural nuance to coverage of Latino communities. “I believe experimenting with my approach to journalism is the way to achieve the most robust writing possible,” she said. “Journalism should help people, and solutions journalism is the next step toward that goal.”
Gabriela Quintero
Gabriela Quintero, an incoming freshman at Barnard College of Columbia University, said she believes that reporting on democracy is a way of helping to uphold it. “Learning from experts in politics will allow me to develop the skills necessary to pursue a professional career in journalism,” she said. “I hope to become a better reporter through the fellowship by working on stories I wouldn’t have had the opportunity to report on otherwise and by developing meaningful connections with young journalists across the country.”
Alexis Tamm
Alexis Tamm, a recent graduate of Georgetown University, is passionate about multidimensional, human‑centered storytelling. She said she was drawn to The Fulcrum’s mission to counter divisive narratives and emphasized her commitment to producing journalism that challenges “us vs. them” mentalities and helps audiences better understand one another to spark meaningful change. “I'm excited to focus on solutions storytelling and to keep learning how to complicate the narrative and give voice to many different perspectives in my work," she said.
The fellows will receive training in op‑ed writing, climate‑solutions reporting in collaboration with the Solutions Journalism Network, and Complicating the Narrative techniques as core components of the fellowship curriculum.
The Fulcrum Fellowship continues to advance its mission of training journalists who can illuminate not only the challenges facing American democracy but also the solutions emerging across communities. The Fulcrum's Executive Editor and Publisher of the Latino News Network, Hugo Balta has described the program as one that empowers young reporters to tell “richer, more human stories” that move beyond one‑dimensional narratives.
“As the 2026 cohort begins its work this summer, these fellows will contribute reporting that expands the reach of their storytelling and strengthens journalism that informs, connects, and empowers communities,” Balta said.
Thanks in part to support from the Hortencia Zavala Foundation, the Fulcrum Fellowship will also host a Fall 2026 session. Applications will open later this summer, offering another opportunity to join the program’s growing national network of next‑generation civic storytellers.
“Growing the Fulcrum Fellowship from its inaugural session last summer to two full sessions this year is an exciting milestone for our newsroom” said David Nevins, publisher of The Fulcrum. “It reflects our commitment to expanding opportunities for emerging journalists and strengthening a pipeline of storytellers who are passionate about informing the public and elevating civic dialogue.”
Hugo Balta is an accredited Solutions Journalism and Complicating the Narratives trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.
The Fulcrum is deeply committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists, investing in emerging reporters who are driven to produce ethical, solutions‑focused storytelling and strengthen civic understanding through their work.
The Latino News Network's mission is to provide greater visibility to Hispanics, Latinos through community‑centered reporting that provides culturally nuanced, solutions‑driven coverage for underserved audiences.
Without such services provided by the Southwestern Illinois school, which could be threatened due to legislative funding cuts to the Medicaid program, McClure said her family would face a significant financial strain.
“These things aren’t cheap,” she said. “Especially with having a child on the spectrum, a lot of stuff that he’s doing in school would be hard for me to cover as a single parent, for him to do it outside of school and without Medicaid.”
The McClures aren’t alone. In fact, Medicaid is the fourth largest funding stream for schools, and it contributes over $8 billion annually to cover health services for students with disabilities and Medicaid-enrolled general education students.
But, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law on July 4, is estimated to cut federal Medicaid spending by approximately $1 trillion over the next decade. While that doesn't directly target school Medicaid programs, the strain on state budgets could lead to a reduction in education funding, fewer covered services, and greater barriers for students maintaining Medicaid coverage, all of which could negatively impact school health services and student outcomes, according to education advocates.
“People don't realize that Medicaid really supports student success,” said Jessie Mandle, the National Program Director at Healthy Schools Campaign, a national nonprofit based in Chicago that aims to improve student wellbeing by creating healthier schools.
“If a kid is uninsured, and they don't have Medicaid, that leads to worse health but also poor academic outcomes,” she continued. “But Medicaid funding is so critical in schools to help schools support the success of all students. And I think that kind of foundational layer that Medicaid provides in schools is something that a lot of people don't realize.”
According to McClure, Medicaid-supported therapy has helped Trent — who attends Franklin Elementary, has Autism and was nonverbal from ages 2 to 7 — to build his vocabulary, find his voice, and gain independence through writing and completing daily tasks. It has also assisted Trenity at Westhaven Elementary, who had a speech delay and a stutter, to slow down, articulate clearly, and express herself confidently, McClure said.
“If Medicaid was cut, it would be hard for them to have the services to actually learn and grow, to be successful in everything that they're trying to be,” McClure said about her kids.
Illinois schools rely on Medicaid
A survey of school administrators and staff conducted in early 2025 showed that 64 percent of Illinois schools' Medicaid reimbursements increased in the last five years.
School leaders statewide said Medicaid reductions would force schools to pull from general education funds, hurting all students, not just those on Medicaid, according to responses to the survey conducted by HSC, which received 1,440 responses, 87 of which were from school and district leaders in Illinois.
Cuts would reduce the availability of social workers, counselors, and psychologists and also limit districts' ability to provide technology that assists student learning and professional development, potentially threatening student wellbeing and academic progress, school staff and administrators said.
According to the National Alliance on Mental Health, more than one in seven U.S. students between the ages of 6 and 17 experience a mental health disorder each year. It is “irresponsible” to cut student health services during a youth “mental health crisis,” said Lena O’Rourke, founder of O’Rourke Health Policy Strategies and HSC’s school Medicaid consultant. This widely documented surge in mental health disorders among adolescents has been characterized by increasing rates of anxiety, depression and suicidal thoughts, and it is driven by numerous factors, including but not limited to the COVID-19 pandemic, social media and academic stress.
a widely documented surge in mental health disorders among adolescents, characterized by escalating rates of anxiety, depression, and suicidality. Driven by complex factors like the COVID-19 pandemic, social media, and academic stress, it has prompted national health emergencies across the globe.
“It is a short term and long term bad policy choice to do this,” she said during the February How to Protect Student Health & School Medicaid in Your State webinar.
Mandle said the survey gathered strong responses from rural districts, which would be especially impacted by potential Medicaid cuts because schools are often the primary and most accessible source of healthcare for students in those communities because long travel distances make it difficult for families to reach outside medical care. If Medicaid cuts reduce schools' ability to provide health services, rural students will have far fewer alternatives to turn to compared to their urban or suburban peers, she said.
“The cuts will be catastrophic to our students and diminish services to our most vulnerable students,” said a school business official at one rural Illinois district in response to the HSC survey.
Pulling all the levers
Since no direct cuts to school-based services have occurred yet, schools will not feel the immediate impacts of federal Medicaid cuts, but as states work to fill massive budget gaps over time, they will need to pull from other budgets, and schools will be part of that “ripple” effect, Mandle said.
“That's going to have an effect on the general fund overall, which could have an effect on education funding, which will then have an effect on school districts,” she said.
For districts that are already navigating financial difficulties – such as the state’s largest, Chicago Public Schools – this could add another stress to an already tight budget. CPS currently carries a nearly $10 billion debt and operates with a $734 million budget deficit due to declining enrollment and the end of federal COVID relief funding.
In order to mitigate impacts, Mandle said school districts should actively maximize Medicaid dollars. She suggested leveraging Medicaid to reimburse salaries for school nurses and psychologists or the services they provide.
“If they are kind of pulling all the levers they can now, they can bring more federal Medicaid dollars into their school district now to help buffer the impact of cuts in other areas,” she said.
Mary Ellen Ritter is a graduate student journalist in Medill's Chicago Investigative Lab and an education reporting fellow at Northwestern University. She previously served as a FOIA extern at The Chicago Reporter as well as an education reporter at The Daytona Beach News-Journal, where she covered about 76,000 students, nearly 10,000 employees and almost 100 K-12 schools in Florida’s Volusia and Flagler counties. Ritter has also worked for the Minnesota Star Tribune, Minnesota Daily, Los Angeles Magazine, Mpls.St.Paul Magazine, Minnesota Public Radio and Milwaukee Magazine. She grew up in Wisconsin and studied journalism and graphic design at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
The Democrats have gotten a pass on the issue of open primaries for years. For the most part, the media has bought in on (and propagated) the myth that when it comes to voting, the Republicans are into voter suppression while the Democrats stand solidly behind voting rights.
I wish we lived in such a simple world.
If you actually look at what’s happening in the country, both the Democrats and the Republicans are systematically attacking the right of independent voters - now 45% of the electorate - to fully participate. The Democrats are leading the charge in DC, Massachusetts, New York, Maryland, California, and Nevada, places where independent voters are surging. In Massachusetts, for example, 65% of registered voters have opted for “independent” on their voter registration form and 70% of state legislators run unopposed, but the Mass. Democratic Party strongly opposes the current effort to enact an all candidate primary system. And the Democratic Party of Maryland insists that Governor Wes Moore didn’t really mean it when he spoke out in favor of letting one million independents participate in Maryland primary elections.
Not to be outdone, the Republicans are on the warpath in Colorado, Tennessee, South Carolina, Alabama and Texas, where they are advancing bills and lawsuits to force voters to join a party if they want to participate in (taxpayer funded) primary elections. In Tennessee, the GOP legislature posts these signs on every poll in the state. No wonder primary turnout is 14% while general election turnout is 64% in the Volunteer State.
Both parties work overtime to rig the rules in their favor. But for some reason, the media has bought into this myth that the Republicans are the bad guys and the Democrats are the good guys, when in fact both parties, in different states and in different ways, lock the system down through gerrymandering and closed primaries. They definitely don’t want independent voices participating, and they want to make sure that their elected officials are completely loyal to the party, that they’re not going to represent their people that put them in there, but the party apparatus that gets them elected.
The other aspect of the Post editorial worth noting is more philosophical.
America is a competitive place. Good or bad, it’s a feature of our culture. And we Americans are accustomed to competition increasing as you get closer to naming a winner. Many people tune into the NBA playoffs, March Madness or the Olympics only after the preliminary rounds are over. That’s how competition works.
But the Democrats and Republicans have turned competition completely on its head. In 90% of America, competition actually decreases after the first round. The general election is an afterthought, predetermined by gerrymandering and other factors. For most of us, all the competition is in the primary - round one - and most of us are not paying attention and participating.
It’s a sorry state of affairs. And the open primaries movement has our work cut out for us.
We need to enact open and nonpartisan primaries in states that are closed. We need to defend open primaries from attacks from both major parties. And we have to educate the American people that voting in round one is how to exercise power. We can’t wait until November to make our voices heard. In most races, the game is up.
John Opdycke is the president of Open Primaries, a national election reform organization.
What Is It To You?