Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump's "Politainment" showcased with Netanyahu

Opinion

Donald Trump
Trump’s win demands transformation, not just defense, of democracy
Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

President Donald Trump first became nationally famous on reality TV, and certainly, this has influenced his political style, described by some as “politainment,” the blending of entertainment with politics.

This week, that style was on full display in the White House briefing with Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when Trump announced he intends to relocate the Palestinian population from Gaza and turn it into “the Riviera of the Middle East.”


Really? Should we take this seriously? Did the President think this out beforehand, or was it pure political theatre?

Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) immediately responded: "This proposal is deranged and nuts. U.S. military presence in the region would be a magnet for trouble."

But is this exactly the response that Trump wants to his political theater? "Political theatre" is a term used to describe performances, plays, or theatrical productions that explore, critique, or represent political themes and are designed to provoke thought, spark debate, and inspire social change.

While most political theatre is just that– theatre performed on stage, President Trump regularly uses his form of political theatre to shock, provoke, and surprise and, yes, to negotiate.

The President's background as a reality TV star has influenced his political style, blending politics with entertainment. Trump's rallies, social media posts, and dramatic statements often turn political events into spectacles that capture widespread public attention. The facts and the specifics of the policy don’t really matter.

And, of course, Trump's "politainment" angers many who believe he is being serious and, of course, delights his supporters.

We have four more years of Trump “politainment” so distinguishing between the political theatre and serious proposals will be a challenge for us all, both politically and emotionally.......and a challenge for Democrats as they try to figure out how to respond.

A few indicators can help us distinguish between Trump's theatre and fantasy and substantive policy and allow us to avoid taking off-the-hand comments too seriously. Before getting worked up, it is best to wait until Trump's comments are accompanied by detailed plans, legislative efforts, and some follow-through by his team. His statements that involved grand gestures and grandiose promises are just Trump's political theatre to rile us up.

President Trump loves positive or negative attention, and his political theatre generates headlines and daily commentary. His love for being in the spotlight and his politainment rise to the top at his rallies energizing his adoring fans as he discredits his opponents rather than boring them with serious policy

It’s the reaction, not the policy, that is his first goal.

But don’t be fooled. And oftentimes, Trump's statements are a blend...not all theatre and not all policy. A perfect example is his executive orders on immigration and border security, which have been seen as political theatre and serious proposals. While they generated significant media coverage and public reaction, their implementation and long-term impact have serious consequences, with some orders facing legal challenges and others being rolled back or modified. Unfortunately, some of his theatre becomes a harsh reality, impacting the lives of millions of people who are at the receiving end of his theatre.

And don’t forget that everything President Trump does is a negotiation, further adding to the difficulty of determining what he is serious about. Combine his passion for political theatre with his love of attention and his penchant for negotiating everything, and it is little wonder that no one quite knows how to respond.

The similarity between theatre and negotiating is profound..... drawing attention to issues with outlandish statements and bold claims has worked masterfully in pushing topics of importance to him to the forefront.

It doesn’t matter if it is shocking or appalling. He gets attention and puts the issue in the headlines. A perfect example is the press conference the morning after the Washington DC plane crash when the President claimed that DEI policies were the cause of the crash without a single piece of evidence. As families grieved and bodies still had not been recovered, Trump couldn’t restrain himself.

Trump's negotiating style combines dramatic actions and statements so outlandish that opponents are forced to respond, or at least think they are.

Thus, it is best to take a step back and not become the pawn as he makes outlandish statements to create the leverage he needs to win. If we allow it, Trump's political theatre will enhance his negotiating position, mobilize his supporters, and influence political discourse.

Undoubtedly, it’s all a tactic that leverages the power of media and public attention to achieve his strategic goals. As Trump dances on the edge of what many of us deem as normal, we will be the clowns for the next four years as the political circus unfolds before our eyes.

SUGGESTION: Don’t get distracted, stupid!

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks about the mid-air crash between American Airlines and a military helicopter at the White House on January 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chen Mengtong/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)


David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

An illustration of a block with the words, "AI," on it, surrounded by slightly smaller caution signs.

The future of AI should be measured by its impact on ordinary Americans—not just tech executives and investors. Exploring AI inequality, labor concerns, and responsible innovation.

Getty Images, J Studios

The Kayla Test: Exploring How AI Impacts Everyday Americans

We’re failing the Kayla Test and running out of time to pass it. Whether AI goes “well” for the country is not a question anyone in SF or DC can answer. To assess whether AI is truly advancing the interests of Americans, AI stakeholders must engage with more than power users, tokenmaxxers, and Fortune 500 CEOs. A better evaluation is to talk to folks like Kayla, my Lyft driver in Morgantown, WV, and find out what they think about AI. It's a test I stumbled upon while traveling from an AI event at the West Virginia University College of Law to one at Stanford Law.

Kayla asked me what I do for a living. I told her that I’m a law professor focused on AI policy. Those were the last words I said for the remainder of the ride to the airport.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close up of a person on their phone at night.

From “Patriot Games” to The Hunger Games, how spectacle, social media, and political culture risk normalizing violence and eroding empathy.

Getty Images, Westend61

The Capitol Is Counting on Us to Laugh

When the Trump administration announced the Patriot Games, many people laughed. Selecting two children per state for a nationally televised sports competition looked too much like Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games to take seriously. But that instinct, to laugh rather than look closer, is one the Capitol is counting on. It has always been easier to normalize violence when it arrives dressed as entertainment or patriotism.

Here’s what I mean: The Hunger Games starts with the reaping, the moment when a Capitol official selects two children, one boy and one girl, to fight to the death against tributes from every other district. The games were created as an annual reminder of a failed rebellion, to remind the districts that dissent has consequences. At first, many Capitol residents saw the games as a just punishment. But sentiments shifted as the spectacle grew—when citizens could bet on winners, when a death march transformed into a beauty pageant, when murder became a pathway to celebrity.

Keep ReadingShow less
Technology and Presidential Election

Anthropic’s Mythos AI raises alarms about surveillance, deepfakes, and democracy. Why urgent AI regulation is needed as U.S. policy struggles to keep pace.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

How the Latest in AI Threatens Democracy

On April 24, America got a wake-up call from Anthropic, one of the nation’s leading artificial intelligence companies. It announced a new AI tool, called Mythos, that can identify flaws in computer networks and software systems that, as Politico puts it, “Even the brightest human minds have been unable to identify.”

A machine smarter than the “brightest human minds” sounds like a line from a dystopian science fiction movie. And if that weren’t scary enough, we now have a government populated by people who seem oblivious to the risks AI poses to democracy and humanity itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Who’s Responsible When AI Causes Harm?: Unpacking the Federal AI Liability Framework Debate
the letters are made up of different colors

Who’s Responsible When AI Causes Harm?: Unpacking the Federal AI Liability Framework Debate

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key takeaways

  • The U.S. has no national AI liability law. Instead, a patchwork of state laws has emerged which has resulted in legal protections being dependent on where an individual resides.
  • It’s often unclear who is legally responsible when AI causes harm. This gap leaves many people with no clear path to seek help.
  • In March 2026, the White House and Congress introduced major proposals to establish a federal standard, but there is significant disagreement about whether that standard should prioritize protecting innovation or protecting people harmed by AI systems.

Background: A Patchwork of State Laws

Without a national AI law, states have been filling in the gaps on their own. The result is an uneven landscape where a person’s legal protections depend entirely on which state they live in.

Keep ReadingShow less