Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Don’t get distracted, stupid!

Opinion

Don’t get distracted, stupid!

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks about the mid-air crash between American Airlines and a military helicopter at the White House on January 30, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chen Mengtong/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)

Politicians are skilled communicators, often employing rhetoric that resonates with their constituents' emotions and values. This ability to engage the public can lead to a heightened focus on personalities rather than policies. For instance, sensational statements or controversial behavior can dominate the news cycle, distracting us from substantive discussions about critical issues such as healthcare, education, or climate change.

“Republicans create a lot of distractions, and Democrats get distracted,” observed Democratic strategist James Carville in Carville: Winning Is Everything, Stupid!, a 2024 documentary about his life.


Carville recently warned Democrats about getting distracted in an interview on News Nation, “So he (Donald Trump) says Greenland, Panama Canal, Canada, the Gulf of America or whatever insane stuff he says, and we shouldn’t get distracted by that. “Your No. 1 thing was you were going to do something about high grocery prices.”

Trump made food prices a central campaign issue. At a September rally, he said, “We have to get them down,” reports the HuffPost. A month later, he promised the same thing at another rally: “We will cut your taxes and inflation” and “slash your prices.”

However, he reneged after winning the election, saying, “It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up.”

I draw inspiration from Carville, who famously coined the phrase, “It’s the economy, stupid!” in Bill Clinton's successful 1992 U.S. presidential election against incumbent George H. W. Bush, when I tell you, “Don’t get distracted, stupid!”

The art of distraction has always been one of Trump's most successful strategies. In 2019, Brian L. Ott, who spent two years studying President Trump’s rhetoric, particularly his use of Twitter (now X), found that Trump's posts typically served one of three purposes: dissembling, distracting, and discrediting. “Collectively, these three strategies make the president a master of misdirection,” Ott wrote in his column on Newsweek. “Quite simply, no president in the modern era has been more successful at shaping and manipulating the news cycle than Donald Trump.”

Then there’s Trump’s scapegoating, as demonstrated last week in a live briefing regarding the deadly American Airlines collision with a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopterover Washington, D.C.

"FAA's diversity push includes focus on hiring people with severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities," the president said. "And then it says, FAA says people with severe disabilities are most underrepresented segment of the workforce. And they want 'em in, and they want them. They can be air traffic controllers. I don't think so."

President Trump expressed his opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives introduced during the Biden administration, including the Federal Aviation Administration's current hiring policies.

"FAA is actively recruiting workers who suffer severe intellectual disabilities, psychiatric problems, and other mental and physical conditions under a diversity and inclusion hiring initiatives spelled out on the agency's website," Trump said.

When pressed on his baseless claim of DEI as a cause of the crash, Trump said: “It just could have been.” And when asked how he could so quickly decide diversity was to blame, he said: “Because I have common sense, OK, and unfortunately, a lot of people don’t.”

The plane crash in Washington, D.C., is the most recent disaster for which he and his allies have blamed DEI, even though the facts don’t support them.

This month, as wildfires swept through the hills of Los Angeles, some right-leaning commentators attributed the crisis to DEI initiatives, particularly in light of Mayor Karen Bass being the city's first female and second Black leader and Fire Chief Kristin Crowley being the first woman and openly queer individual to head the department.

Following the violent attack during New Year’s Day celebrations in New Orleans, GOP Rep. Dan Meuser remarked on Fox News that the focus of the past four years has been on DEI rather than public safety concerns, citing conversations with those within relevant agencies.

After a shipping vessel collided with Baltimore’s Key Bridge in March 2024, a gubernatorial candidate from Utah criticized "governors who prioritize diversity" despite the vessel reportedly having maintenance issues. This incident also sparked a wave of racist comments directed at Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, who, along with Maryland Governor Wes Moore, is a Black Democrat.

Former President Trump's 2016 campaign began with controversial statements about Mexican immigrants, and he has continued to face criticism for his remarks about various minority groups. While Trump and his supporters argue that their opposition to DEI initiatives is rooted in a commitment to fairness and merit, the ongoing discourse raises questions about the implications of their rhetoric regarding people of color within the broader context of the Trump movement.

Media’s Misstep In Disseminating One-Dimensional Narratives

In the age of rapid information dissemination, the role of news media in shaping public understanding of government has never been more critical. However, many commercial news outlets don’t adequately prioritize the issues that matter most to the electorate when covering elected officials.

Legacy media often prioritize stories that attract viewership or readership, which can lead to an emphasis on sensational political events over in-depth analyses of policy implications. This cycle perpetuates a focus on political drama rather than constructive dialogue about governance. As a result, audiences may find themselves more engaged in the latest political scandal than in understanding the complexities of legislative processes.

Social media has transformed the way political information is disseminated and consumed. Platforms like X and Facebook allow for rapid sharing of news and opinions, often leading to a focus on sound bites and viral moments. Politicians can leverage these platforms to create narratives that capture public attention, sometimes at the expense of more nuanced discussions. The immediacy of social media can create a culture of distraction, where users are more likely to react to sensational content rather than engage in thoughtful discourse.

Politicians, Republicans, and Democrats alike are very savvy about how to manipulate media to their advantage.

Nothing Up My Sleeve

As Ott wrote, “Misdirection is, of course, the basis of magic or illusion. The magician draws the audience's attention to something insignificant so that they do not notice the significant thing that is happening right before their eyes—the thing that would destroy the illusion. As a master of misdirection, Donald Trump is exceedingly good at shifting our attention away from things that matter.”

So, don’t get distracted by executive orders to “build more wall” on the southern border, and pay attention to a reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. It would end “birthright citizenship.”

Don’t get distracted by Trump Referring to oil and gas as “liquid gold,” the president claimed that maximizing their production will be key to making the US a “rich nation again.” The United States is already the largest oil and gas producer in the world. Pay attention to the fact that last year, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported that 27 extreme weather events exacerbated by these emissions resulted in nearly $183 billion in damages.

Don’t get distracted by the president signing an executive order putting an end to all federal DEI initiatives, calling them “illegal,” “immoral,” and “discriminatory.” Pay attention to how these orders indicate a potential shift away from efforts aimed at promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility, possibly leading to the establishment of new barriers to opportunity.

The tendency to be distracted by politicians has significant implications for public discourse. When attention is diverted to personalities and sensationalism, critical issues may go unaddressed. This can lead to a disengaged electorate, where citizens feel disillusioned or apathetic about political processes. Moreover, the lack of informed debate on essential issues can hinder effective governance and the development of policies that genuinely address societal challenges.

By fostering a more informed and engaged citizenry, our society can move towards a more productive and meaningful dialogue about the challenges we face.

SUGGESTION: Advance DEI, do not retreat from it

Fulcrum co-publishers David Nevins and Kristina Becvar and executive editor Hugo Balta discussed the challenges and opportunities of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

"Diversity," "Equity" and "Inclusion" on wood blocksDEI is worth saving if programs focus on expanding advantages Nora Carol Photography/Getty Images


. Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and a board member of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network and a trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.


Read More

AI, Reality, and the Pygmalion Effect: Why Human Judgment Still Matters
Woman typing on laptop at wooden table with breakfast.

AI, Reality, and the Pygmalion Effect: Why Human Judgment Still Matters

When the World goes Mad, one must accept Madness as Sanity, since Sanity is, in the last analysis, nothing but the Madness on which the Whole World happens to agree. (George Bernard Shaw)

Among the most prolific and famous playwrights of the 20th century, Shaw wrote “Pygmalion,” the play upon which “My Fair Lady” was based. Pygmalion was a Greek mythological figure, a sculptor from Cyprus, who fell in love with the statue he created. Aphrodite turned his sculpture into a real woman, promoting the idea that the “created” is greater than the “creator.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Humanoid Educators Will Widen Inequality—And Only Tech Overlords Will Benefit
a sign with a question mark and a question mark drawn on it

Humanoid Educators Will Widen Inequality—And Only Tech Overlords Will Benefit

In March, First Lady Melania Trump hosted an AI-powered humanoid robot at the White House during the Fostering the Future Together Global Coalition Summit, and introduced Plato, a humanoid educator marketed as a replacement for teachers that could homeschool children. A humanoid educator that speaks multiple languages, is always available, and draws on a vast store of information could expand access in meaningful ways. But the evidence suggests that the risks outweigh the benefits, that adoption will be uneven, and that the families most likely to adopt Plato will bear those risks disproportionately.

Research on excessive technology use in childhood has found consistent results. Young children and teenagers who spend too much time with screens are more likely to experience reduced physical activity, lower attention spans, depression, and social anxiety. On the same day that Melania Trump introduced Plato, a California jury ruled that Meta and YouTube contributed to anxiety and depression in a woman who began using social media at age 6, a reminder that the consequences of under-tested technology on children can be severe and long-lasting.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a block with the words, "AI," on it, surrounded by slightly smaller caution signs.

The future of AI should be measured by its impact on ordinary Americans—not just tech executives and investors. Exploring AI inequality, labor concerns, and responsible innovation.

Getty Images, J Studios

The Kayla Test: Exploring How AI Impacts Everyday Americans

We’re failing the Kayla Test and running out of time to pass it. Whether AI goes “well” for the country is not a question anyone in SF or DC can answer. To assess whether AI is truly advancing the interests of Americans, AI stakeholders must engage with more than power users, tokenmaxxers, and Fortune 500 CEOs. A better evaluation is to talk to folks like Kayla, my Lyft driver in Morgantown, WV, and find out what they think about AI. It's a test I stumbled upon while traveling from an AI event at the West Virginia University College of Law to one at Stanford Law.

Kayla asked me what I do for a living. I told her that I’m a law professor focused on AI policy. Those were the last words I said for the remainder of the ride to the airport.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close up of a person on their phone at night.

From “Patriot Games” to The Hunger Games, how spectacle, social media, and political culture risk normalizing violence and eroding empathy.

Getty Images, Westend61

The Capitol Is Counting on Us to Laugh

When the Trump administration announced the Patriot Games, many people laughed. Selecting two children per state for a nationally televised sports competition looked too much like Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games to take seriously. But that instinct, to laugh rather than look closer, is one the Capitol is counting on. It has always been easier to normalize violence when it arrives dressed as entertainment or patriotism.

Here’s what I mean: The Hunger Games starts with the reaping, the moment when a Capitol official selects two children, one boy and one girl, to fight to the death against tributes from every other district. The games were created as an annual reminder of a failed rebellion, to remind the districts that dissent has consequences. At first, many Capitol residents saw the games as a just punishment. But sentiments shifted as the spectacle grew—when citizens could bet on winners, when a death march transformed into a beauty pageant, when murder became a pathway to celebrity.

Keep ReadingShow less