Skip to content

Latest Stories

Top Stories

GOP hopes of evading partisan gerrymander verdict stalled by N.C. court

North Carolina draft congressional map

The Republican-majority General Assembly has enacted this congressional remap, which would reduce the number of safe GOP seats to eight from 10. Democrats say that's still not balanced enough.

North Carolina General Assembly

The official start of congressional campaigns in North Carolina has been postponed indefinitely by court order, a sign the most important partisan gerrymandering battle in the country is not close to ending.

Instead of candidates filing their paperwork for the primaries starting Dec. 2, the big political news that day will be another round of arguments before the three judges in Charlotte supervising the latest redistricting in the state.

In announcing that new timetable Wednesday, the judges made clear they were not ready to accept the first draft of a new map produced last week by the Republicans who control the General Assembly.

In hopes of settling a lawsuit arguing that the current map so favors Republicans that it violates that state constitutional rights of Democrats, the GOP mapmakers at the statehouse produced a new one. It effectively assures their party will win eight of the 13 seats next year — down from the 10 it holds now.

Democrats immediately told the judges that map was not nearly good enough because it almost assures a GOP majority in the delegation after 2020, even though the congressional vote in the state in recent elections has been just about evenly split.

The judges this fall threw out the state legislative boundaries that similarly favored the GOP and have signaled they are ready to apply the same rationale — that extreme efforts by the cartographers to hold on to power violates the fair elections clause of the constitution — to any House map that gives the GOP too much of an edge.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Their ruling has made North Carolina, so long the center of fights over racial gerrymandering, ground zero in the fight over partisan gerrymandering as well — especially now that the Supreme Court has ruled such fights cannot be settled in the federal courts

Delaying the start of the candidate filing period makes sense because the candidates do not yet know the contours of the districts where they would run. But if the final lines are not drawn soon, the judges will be under pressure to delay the March primaries.

Read More

Meat case at the grocery store
Mostafa Bassim/Anadolu via Getty Images

Soaring grocery prices are not acts of God

Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

Since the pandemic, going to the grocery store has become a jarring experience. On a recent visit, I packed my purchased items into my tote bag and then gawked at the receipt in disbelief.

I’m not alone. Griping about the high cost of groceries has become a national pastime. It’s not just a figment of our imaginations: Grocery prices have soared nearly 27 percent since 2020, higher than overall inflation.

Keep ReadingShow less
Project 2025: A federal Parents' Bill of Rights

Republican House members hold a press event to highlight the introduction in 2023.

Bill O'Leary/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Project 2025: A federal Parents' Bill of Rights

Biffle is a podcast host and contributor at BillTrack50.

This is part of a series offering a nonpartisan counter to Project 2025, a conservative guideline to reforming government and policymaking during the first 180 days of a second Trump administration. The Fulcrum's cross partisan analysis of Project 2025 relies on unbiased critical thinking, reexamines outdated assumptions, and uses reason, scientific evidence, and data in analyzing and critiquing Project 2025.

Project 2025, the conservative Heritage Foundation’s blueprint for a second Trump administration, includes an outline for a Parents' Bill of Rights, cementing parental considerations as a “top tier” right.

The proposal calls for passing legislation to ensure families have a "fair hearing in court when the federal government enforces policies that undermine their rights to raise, educate, and care for their children." Further, “the law would require the government to satisfy ‘strict scrutiny’ — the highest standard of judicial review — when the government infringes parental rights.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump and Joe Biden debating

Former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden at the debate on June 27.

Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images

Dems, Republicans and the death of common sense: We are stuck with Biden and Trump

Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.

Common sense. We all know what it means, but common as it is, definitions and ideas of it have changed over centuries.

Aristotle connected common sense directly to the senses, and the ways in which we use different tastes, colors, feelings, smells and sounds to collectively perceive and categorize things.

Descartes agreed with Aristotle that it linked the mind to the senses, but argued it was a less effective tool of judgment than mathematical and methodical reasoning.

I’m partial to Italian philosopher Giambattista Vico’s definition of common sense: “Judgment without reflection, shared by an entire class, an entire people, an entire nation, or the entire human race.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court
Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images

The Supreme Court is a threat to American democracy

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was a wake-up call for Americans who had grown complacent about their rights and freedoms. The court's decision was just the beginning of a series of rulings showcasing its alarming readiness to influence almost every facet of American life.

Keep ReadingShow less