Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

New Yorkers defeat vote-by-mail proposal, but D.C. may move one forward

People voting in New York

Voters in New York rejected three proposal to change voting and redistricting.

Ed Jonesn/AFP via Getty Images

The past week has brought both positive and negative news for supporters of expanded access to voting by mail.

During last week's election, voters in New York rejected a ballot proposal that would have directed the Legislature to pass a bill allowing for no-excuse absentee ballots. The result caught many by surprise, as most states — especially those that tend to vote Democratic — have such policies in place. Instead, only 38 percent of voters in the nation's fourth most populous state supported the proposal.

Meanwhile, the D.C. City Council began the process this week for institutionalizing vote-by-mail for the nearly 700,000 residents of the nation's capital.


While Americans used mail-in voting at a historic rate in 2020, New York lagged behind most other states. According to a report issued this summer by the federal Election Assistance Commission, 43.1 percent of voters used mail-in ballots last year. But only 20.3 percent of New Yorkers selected that option, the 12th lowest rate.

According to Ballotpedia, 34 states either provide all voters with a mail ballot or allow the use of an absentee ballot without providing a reason. The remaining 16, primarily Republican-dominated states in the South, require voters to meet certain requirements in order to vote by absentee ballot.

Another proposal, which would have allowed people to register to vote and cast a ballot on Election Day, was also defeated. Proponents of such policies argue that same-day registration increases turnout, considered a key component of a strong democracy. And a third proposal, one that would have reformed the state's redistricting process, went down as well.

"The failure of props 1, 3, and 4 is a black eye for democracy," Common Cause New York's executive director, Susan Lerner, said in a statement. "These results are a cautionary tale showing that even in deep blue New York, we can't take pro-democracy outcomes for granted. Anti-democracy forces are drowning out common-sense reforms with fear mongering scare tactics, and voters are listening."

According to The Guardian, the Conservative and Republican parties vastly out-spent Democrats to fight those proposals and devoted significant on-the-ground resources as well.

While New York has settled these issues for the time being, some potential election reforms are just getting underway in Washington, D.C.

New legislation was introduced Tuesday to make a series of changes to D.C. election laws, including the establishment of a permanent vote-by-mail system. The city made a one-time decision to mail ballots to all voters for the 2020 general election, and this bill would codify such a system for future elections.

The bill would also increase the use of ballot drop boxes, establish voting centers and make Election Day a holiday.

"D.C. held a safe, secure, and accessible election by making it easier to vote and safe to vote from home," said the bill's sponsor, Councilmember Charles Allen. "These are common sense and popular changes we need to make a permanent part of our elections moving forward. In doing so, we will broaden the number of people who are able to participate in our elections and feel more invested in their government."

In addition, Allen will chair a hearing Nov. 18 on legislation to implement ranked-choice voting in Washington.

Read More

Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians

Capitol building, Washington, DC

Unsplash/Getty Images

Poll: 82% of Americans Want Redistricting Done by Independent Commission, Not Politicians

There may be no greater indication that voters are not being listened to in the escalating redistricting war between the Republican and Democratic Parties than a new poll from NBC News that shows 8-in-10 Americans want the parties to stop.

It’s what they call an "80-20 issue," and yet neither party is standing up for the 80% as they prioritize control of Congress.

Keep ReadingShow less
Nationalization by Stealth: Trump’s New Industrial Playbook

The White House and money

AI generated image

Nationalization by Stealth: Trump’s New Industrial Playbook

In the United States, where the free market has long been exalted as the supreme engine of prosperity, a peculiar irony is taking shape. On August 22, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced that the federal government had acquired a stake of just under 10% in Intel, instantly making itself the company’s largest shareholder. The stake - roughly 433 million shares, valued at about $8.9 billion, purchased at $20.47 each - was carved out of the Biden-era CHIPS Act subsidies and repackaged as equity. Formally, it is a passive, non-voting stake, with no board seat or governance rights. Yet symbolism matters: Washington now sits, however discreetly, in Intel’s shareholder register. Soon afterward, reports emerged that Samsung, South Korea’s industrial giant, had also been considered for similar treatment. What once would have been denounced as creeping socialism in Washington is now unfolding under Donald Trump, a president who boasts of his devotion to private enterprise but increasingly embraces tactics that blur the line between capitalism and state control.

The word “nationalization,” for decades associated with postwar Britain, Latin American populists, or Arab strongmen, is suddenly back in circulation - but this time applied to the citadel of capitalism itself. Trump justifies the intervention as a matter of national security and economic patriotism. Subsidies, he argues, are wasteful. Tariffs, in his view, are a stronger tool for forcing corporations to relocate factories to U.S. soil. Yet the CHIPS Act, that bipartisan legacy of the Biden years, remains in force and politically untouchable, funneling billions of dollars into domestic semiconductor projects. Rather than scrap it, Trump has chosen to alter the terms: companies that benefit from taxpayer largesse must now cede equity to the state. Intel, heavily reliant on those funds, has become the test case for this new model of American industrial policy.

Keep ReadingShow less