Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

How Pop Culture Can Save Democracy: Lessons From Just Do It to Designated Drive

From sitcoms to slogans, America’s most iconic campaigns show how metaphor and media can reignite civic participation. Every movement needs a phrase. A vibration. A cultural spark that turns passive awareness into active participation.

Opinion

How Pop Culture Can Save Democracy: Lessons From Just Do It to Designated Drive

Shoppers stand in line at a Nike outlet store on May 3, 2025 in San Diego, California.

Getty Images, Kevin Carter

In the late 1980s, the Harvard Alcohol Project did just that. By embedding the term designated driver into prime-time television—from Cheers to L.A. Law—they didn’t just coin a phrase. They changed people’s behavior. The campaign was credited with helping reduce alcohol-related traffic fatalities by nearly 30% over the following decade. President George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, along with organizations like Mothers Against Drunk Driving, endorsed the movement, amplifying its reach.

They made sober driving socially admirable, not awkward. And they proved that when language meets culture, norms shift.


A well-orchestrated communications campaign can seed a term into the national consciousness and catalyze behavioral change. It’s a strategy we must revisit in this era of deep civic fragmentation.

Nike’s Just Do It campaign followed a similar path. It wasn’t about sneakers—it was about identity. It told millions of Americans that athleticism wasn’t reserved for Olympians. It was for anyone willing to move. To try. To act.

Television sitcoms of the past played a similar role, entertaining us while holding up a mirror to society. Archie Bunker, from All in the Family (1971–1979), is a quintessential example. His bigoted, close-minded views were never celebrated; they were humanized. Audiences saw a man clinging to outdated beliefs, yet loving his family, fumbling through change, and occasionally revealing unexpected tenderness. That complexity made him relatable, even lovable, and it allowed viewers to confront their own biases without defensiveness.

It’s this understanding of America’s contradictions—its flaws and its potential—that we need to reclaim today.

As Norman Lear’s groundbreaking sitcom tackled racism, gender roles, and generational divides, Archie became a cultural touchstone. He didn’t preach progress but paradoxically helped create it. His flaws weren’t just punchlines—they were invitations for Americans to reconsider what they laughed at, what they tolerated, and what they believed.

We need that same energy now for Democracy.

At The Fulcrum, we’ve seen how pop culture can be a civic catalyst. One of our most-read sections this past year wasn’t policy analysis—it was music, poetry, and dance. Pop culture is the heartbeat of a nation searching for connection. Its popularity confirmed what we’ve long believed: culture isn’t a distraction from Democracy—it’s the gateway to it.

Actual change requires more than infrastructure—it requires inspiration. It requires a new kind of campaign that doesn’t just inform but moves.

History offers us a blueprint for remixing the civic narrative. Imagine a phrase like Just Show Up—a call to action, not for the gym, but for the town hall, or United We Band—a movement where music becomes the medium for civic renewal.

Other iconic slogans could be reimagined:

· A Diamond Is Forever becomes Democracy Forever—If We Can Keep It

· Got Milk? Becomes Got Democracy?

These campaigns didn’t just sell—they shifted. They used metaphor, emotion, and repetition to make language sticky and behavior malleable. If we want to seed terms like civic renewal or democracy ecosystem into public consciousness, we must reverse-engineer these strategies to build a new cultural imprint.

Art breaks boundaries. It overcomes distances. It multiplies energy. And it reminds us that democracy isn’t just a system—it’s a song we all contribute to.

So let’s think outside the ballot box. Let’s make civic engagement not just a duty but exciting. Because for true change to happen in our democratic republic, Americans must realize they already hold the mic. We’re just here to turn up the volume.

David Nevins is publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less
La Ventanita: Uniting Conservative Mothers and Liberal Daughters

Steph Martinez and Rachel Ramirez with their mothers after their last performance

Photo Provided

La Ventanita: Uniting Conservative Mothers and Liberal Daughters

When Northwestern theater and creative writing junior Lux Vargas wrote and brought to life La Ventanita, she created a space of rest and home for those who live in the grief of not belonging anywhere, yet still yearn for a sense of belonging together. By closing night, Vargas had mothers and daughters, once splintered by politics, in each other's arms. In a small, sold-out theater in Evanston, the story on stage became a mirror: centering on mothers who fled the country and daughters who left again for college.

Performed four times on May 9 and 10, La Ventanita unfolds in a fictional cafecito window inspired by the walk-up restaurant counters found throughout Miami. “The ventanita breeds conversations and political exchange,” said Vargas.

Keep ReadingShow less