Leland R. Beaumont is an independent wisdom researcher who is seeking real good. He is currently developing the Applied Wisdom curriculum on Wikiversity.
Introduction
The United States, as a nation built by immigrants, has historically been a symbol of hope and opportunity for people seeking a better life. However, in recent times, the difficulties faced by the U.S. border control system have become a glaring indication of the failure to advance human rights worldwide. This essay delves into the various ways in which the challenges at the U.S. borders reflect the broader global failure to protect and promote human rights.
Escalating Migration and Asylum Crisis
The rising number of migrants and asylum-seekers attempting to enter the United States is a clear manifestation of the global human rights crisis. Individuals and families fleeing persecution, violence, and poverty in their home countries embark on perilous journeys in search of safety and dignity. The inability of their countries of origin to protect their basic human rights compels them to take extreme measures to secure a better future, often leading them to face harsh conditions at the U.S. borders.
Exploitation by Human Traffickers
Human trafficking, one of the gravest violations of human rights, thrives in regions with weak governance and lack of opportunities. Many migrants attempting to cross U.S. borders fall victim to human traffickers, who exploit their vulnerabilities and subject them to various forms of abuse and modern-day slavery. This crisis is a stark reminder of the global failure to combat trafficking and protect the rights of the most vulnerable populations.
Family Separation and Detention
The controversial practice of family separation and detention at the U.S. borders has garnered widespread condemnation, drawing attention to the impact of policies on human rights. The separation of children from their parents underlines the failure of governments worldwide to uphold the rights of families and children, especially those displaced by conflict and persecution.
Lack of Access to Asylum
The stringent immigration policies and limited access to asylum in the United States reflect the broader failure of the international community to provide safe havens for refugees. Many asylum-seekers are denied the opportunity to claim protection, leaving them exposed to further risks and human rights abuses.
Inadequate Support for Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)
Apart from those attempting to cross the U.S. borders, millions of people are internally displaced within their own countries due to conflicts, disasters, and human rights abuses. The inability of the international community to provide adequate support and protection for these IDPs exacerbates global human rights challenges.
Economic Inequalities and Lack of Opportunities
Economic inequalities and lack of opportunities in many regions contribute to the desperate quest for a better life in the United States and other developed countries. The failure to address global poverty and ensure equitable economic development perpetuates a cycle of migration driven by the pursuit of basic human rights such as food, shelter, and education.
Conclusion
The difficulties faced by the U.S. border control system serve as a stark reminder of the broader failure to advance human rights worldwide. Escalating migration and asylum crises, exploitation by human traffickers, family separation and detention, limited access to asylum, inadequate support for internally displaced persons, and economic inequalities all underscore the pressing need for greater global cooperation and commitment to human rights.
Addressing these challenges requires concerted efforts from governments, international organizations, and civil society. Advancing human rights worldwide demands comprehensive strategies to address the root causes of migration, promote equitable economic development, strengthen protections for vulnerable populations, combat human trafficking, and ensure that the rights and dignity of all individuals are upheld.
Only through collective action and a commitment to human rights as a universal value can we effectively address the difficulties at U.S. borders and build a more just and compassionate world for all.
This essay was written by ChatGPT responding to the prompt, “Write an essay describing the many ways that United States border control difficulties are symptoms of a failure to advance human rights worldwide”
A golden tray sits on the Resolute Desk as President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement on American nuclear innovation in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Trump is signing multiple executive orders targeting the nuclear energy sector and easing rules for new reactors and nuclear fuel supply chains.
Trump’s hubris rivals the fallen heroes of ancient Greek mythology
In January, the New York Times asked President Donald Trump if there were any limits on his global powers.
“Yeah,” the president responded, “there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
That was eight months ago, but fortunately Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster adaptation of “The Odyssey” has made ancient Greek literature newly relevant. Before that window closes, I’d like to talk about hubris.
Today, the term mostly means excessive pride or arrogance. That’s part of what the Greeks meant by it too, but the meaning was a bit richer and more specific. Hubris was an insolent or outrageous act that offended the gods, often because the transgressor was claiming abilities or authorities that solely belonged to supreme beings.
Nolan renamed and slightly modified the concept of xenia for the film, calling it “Zeus’ law.” In the director’s telling, mortals should follow the rules laid out by the gods, specifically the requirement to treat strangers with respect lest they be gods in disguise.
In a sense, hubris is the opposite, or at least the rejection, of xenia. The hubris of the suitors, and at times Odysseus himself, invites punishment by the gods and their mortal instruments.
Which brings me back to Donald Trump. His claim that there are no constraints on his personal power to dictate events on the global stage was one of the greatest expressions of hubris ever uttered by a political leader.
Trump’s claim was obviously false when he made it.
He vowed that he could end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours. He’s proved powerless to make that happen. If he had divine powers to work his will, why would he have balked at implementing his tariffs so often that Wall Street adopted the “TACO trade” term for his deals? “TACO” stands for “Trump always chickens out.”
And why would Trump have made so many embarrassing concessions to China — from rescinding tariffs on Chinese goods to allowing them to buy crucial and incredibly valuable computer chips?
But Trump saw his success at capturing Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro as proof of his ability to launch missiles to the same effect as Zeus’ lightning bolts. Trump believed he was the most powerful man who ever lived.
This is no exaggeration. In March, when the Iran invasion seemed successful, Trump gave a document penned by“Presidential Historian David King” to New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan purporting to prove that Trump was “the most powerful person to have EVER walked this planet.” King was, in fact, a businessman and occasional caddy for legendary golfer Gary Player.
King compared Trump favorably to many of history’s most powerful, and often heinous, figures: Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, William the Conqueror, Napoleon Bonaparte, Joseph Stalin, Genghis Khan, Mao Tse Tung, Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin. Many of these men thought they were the most powerful person in the world, too. And many were defeated precisely because they believed it.
At least Napoleon and Hitler had a string of truly impressive victories before they learned the folly of hubris. The limits on Trump’s power have been exposed by far less august forces than the combined might of the allies in World War II or the fearsome Russian winter.
Iran is a comparatively middling power. But the regime’s ability to absorb punishment while imposing its will on the Strait of Hormuz has proved to be a greater constraint on Trump’s power than his morality or mind. We should note that, at least rhetorically, his morality has not proved much of a constraint. He has repeatedly promised to destroy Iranian “civilization” if the regime refuses to capitulate.
But they haven’t — and won’t anytime soon — because the regime’s tolerance for pain far outstrips Trump’s. The combined fear of skyrocketing oil prices, outrage of Gulf state potentates, diminishing weapon supplies and domestic unpopularity is doing the work that international law, congressional oversight and the collective opinion of foreign policy experts can’t or won’t do.
If I considered Trump more heroic than reason and facts could allow, I would say his Sisyphean predicament has the whiff of Greek tragedy to it. Trump is vexed by the fact that the Iranians won’t honor deals or ratify his countless premature claims of victory — giving new meaning to his vow that his presidency would make people tired of winning. It’s almost like they’re out-Trumping Trump.
Things might have gone better if he’d heeded that great Greek tragedian Sophocles: “For Zeus utterly abhors the boasts of a proud tongue.”
____
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.