Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

No mail ballot arrived, so many Ohioans risk health and head to the polls

Ohio state flag
Patra Kongsirimongkolchai/Getty Images

The delayed finish of the Ohio primary is in a few hours, but many voters are grappling with a difficult decision at the last moment: Confront the health risks of heading out to vote in person Tuesday or else be forced to sit this one out.

Three weeks after Wisconsin earned global criticism for pushing ahead with its primary in the teeth of the coronavirus pandemic, Ohio is threatened with similar ridicule — because thousands never received ballots they requested for what was supposed to be an all vote-by-mail election.

The back-to-back problems point to the level of logistical and legal impediments the country must overcome for there to be a fair, complete and healthy presidential election in November.


After Gov. Mike DeWine cited a public health emergency and postponed the primary hours before it was to happen March 17, his fellow Republicans in charge of the Legislature said the finish would happen seven weeks later and entirely by mail, with only the disabled or homeless voting in person. That led to widespread confusion, frustration with the election process and some successful lawsuits from voting rights groups.

Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose called in reinforcements for the Postal Service after mail delivery slowed considerably last week. But despite these last-minute efforts, thousands lined up in person Tuesday to drop off ballots or vote provisionally at county offices before 7:30 p.m.

Voting rights groups opened a hotline for voters with troubles and at midday briefed reporters on what they'd heard: People waiting more than two weeks for a ballot that never came, and others who tried contacting their local elections board only to receive no answer or confusing, and sometimes incorrect, information.

"This process has been anything but smooth and clear to voters, and also election officials," said Mike Brickner of All Voting is Local, one of the hotline operators. "We want to make sure what's happening in Ohio will not happen again in another state."

Ohio's election is the first since Wisconsin's. While seven in 10 Wisconsinites were able to vote by mail, thousands said they had to don masks and gloves to vote because they never got the absentee paperwork they requested.

In order to be counted in Ohio, ballots had to be postmarked by Monday and received within 10 days. But the state plans to announce results Tuesday night.

LaRose announced Monday that almost 2 million Ohioans had requested a vote-by-mail ballot and more than 1.4 million had been returned.

"In a matter of weeks, we've done something that's taken other states years to do — transform our state into one capable of voting entirely by mail," he said in a statement.

Still, it's clear this primary will have had significantly less participation than four years ago when more than 3.2 million voted.

Several states have delayed their primaries or resorted to vote-by-mail due to concerns about the pandemic. New York on Monday canceled its presidential primary altogether. Voting rights activists are pushing Congress to spend at least $2 billion so states can provide easier access to voting by mail.

Former Vice President Joe Biden is expected to win the Ohio presidential primary with ease, so much of the suspense and turnout was driven by down-ballot contests for both parties' nominations for Congress, the Legislature, judgeships and local offices.

"No doubt the state could have, and should have, done more to make the balloting process easier," said Kristen Clarke, executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. For starters, she said, Ohio lawmakers should have decided to mail absentee ballot applications to all active voters.


Read More

A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

How 9/11’s Memory Continues to Shape American Citizenship

Twenty‑five years after September 11th, the burden of that day continues to affect us in ways that are difficult to express. It was a moment of profound loss, but also one that revealed both the vulnerability and resilience of our national fabric. The memories remain vivid for many of us: where we were, what we felt, and how the world appeared to change in an instant. Even now, a quarter century later, the impact of that morning continues to shape how we understand our country, our responsibilities, and our relationships with one another.

To help us all reflect on that day, I invited four contributors to the Fulcrum to share reflections not to revisit the tragedy, but to commemorate the ways it has persisted in our consciousness twenty-five years later.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

An immigrant's perspective on why America's election debate over security vs. access is a false choice — and how USPS mail ballot rules fit in.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

Ballot Security and Voter Access Are Not Opposites: What the USPS Ballot Rule Gets Right

I came to the United States from India in 1982. In Indian elections, I watched officials check voter identity and mark a voter’s finger with indelible ink. Party representatives observed the process. The system was imperfect, as every large democracy is, but it sent a simple message: casting one vote is a serious civic act, and the process should make that clear.

When I later became an American citizen and cast my first ballot, the experience felt very different. A poll worker found my name on a list and handed me a ballot. In my precinct, there was no photo identification check. I was surprised—not because I expected voting to be difficult, but because I expected a system as consequential as an election to have clear, visible safeguards.

Keep ReadingShow less
A group of people wait in line to get their ballots to vote in the election.

Uncontested elections are more common than you'd think. From open primaries to multi-member districts, here's what states like California and Alaska are doing to bring real competition back to the ballot — and what it'll take to change political culture, too.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

What America Can Do About Its Uncontested Elections

Politics nerds have many ideas about how to strengthen American democracy; however, few directly address silent elections. For example, ranked-choice voting does nothing to encourage more candidates to run if there are not enough. Term limits increase turnover, but even newcomers can frequently run uncontested in general elections if they have won competitive primaries.

Fortunately, the cause isn’t hopeless. For one, tightening campaign finance laws would put potential challengers on more even footing with corporate-backed politicians, encouraging more candidates to run. Independent redistricting would also help. The Cook Political Report, a poll aggregator, considers only 69 of America’s 435 House districts competitive. Fair redistricting means more competitive districts and therefore more contested elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Americans Vote In The 2024 Presidential Election

Voters cast their ballots on November 5, 2024 in Jefferson, New Hampshire.

John Tully/Getty Images

Non-Popular Vote Presidents: Conservatives’ Pathways for Abandoning Fiscal Responsibility

In political science and macroeconomic analysis, conservative administrations that win governance through the Electoral College without securing the national popular vote (historically exemplified by administrations like George W. Bush in 2000 and Donald Trump in 2016) navigate specific structural, ideological, and strategic pathways that often lead to the abandonment of traditional fiscal restraint.

Supply-Side Supremacy and "Starve the Beast"

Keep ReadingShow less