Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The path to safe voting in an ailing democracy

Opinion

Domke and Douglas are co-founders of Common Power, a civic action organization based in Seattle working "to foster, support and amplify a democracy that is just and inclusive."


This November, millions of Americans will choose between their safety and their right to vote. Those hardest hit will be people of color. In a nation founded on the sanctity of self-government, this is unacceptable. With just four months until an unprecedented election, only five states offer universal mail-in voting.

This is not a new problem. It's a new symptom of a larger disease. Since 1776, this country has seen strategic efforts to control who votes — from wealth and gender restrictions, to Jim Crow discrimination, to today's voter ID laws and the targeted removal of polling opportunities.

It's a problem so immense that two years ago we both upended our lives to fight it. Charles left a corporate management role at Starbucks and David took leave from a tenured faculty post at the University of Washington. We brought together a group of Seattleites — mostly people of color — and founded an organization dedicated to the belief that all citizens have the right to vote and should be encouraged to exercise it.

And we have some good news. We all have the power to fight for safe voting right now, even from home. And we have the duty to do so, even if our ballot comes in the mail.

As a first step, Common Power has launched a national campaign to push leaders to make it easier and safer to vote this November. This means expanding early in-person voting and reducing barriers to voting by mail, like required rationales. We have forms, scripts, elected officials' contact information — everything needed to advocate safely.

So far this year, 11 states have reduced barriers to safe voting, with several more on the way. But we must keep pushing — as we just saw in Maryland, the transition to safer voting is simply a matter of political will, and it's up to all of us to continue fighting for everyone's voice in government.

Second, we've created tailored registration and mobilization methods that range from old-school letter-writing to texting voters. For example, in partnership with the Voter Participation Center and Sister District, our volunteers mailed 10,000 hand-written letters encouraging Pennsylvanians to register to vote. Matching this effort with actual registrations will give insight into civic action and engagement in an increasingly remote-only world.

We believe in the power of collective action. Wouldn't be in this fight otherwise. Together with 2,000 Seattle-area volunteers and nationwide partners like BlackPAC and New Virginity Majority, we've registered and mobilized 100,000 potential voters in 20 states through texting, calling, postcards and door-knocking.

Today, clearing the path to a "more perfect" democracy looks a lot like it did 100 years ago — collective, citizen-led activism leading to incremental progress, with the occasional great leap forward in policy.

Now is the moment for a leap.

Read More

​DCF Commissioner Jodi Hill-Lilly.

DCF Commissioner Jodi Hill-Lilly speaks to the gathering at an adoption ceremony in Torrington.

Laura Tillman / CT Mirror

What’s Behind the Smiles on National Adoption Day

In the past 21 years, I’ve fostered and adopted children with complex medical and developmental needs. Last year, after a grueling 2,205 days navigating the DCF system, we adopted our 7yo daughter. This year, we were the last family on the docket for National Adoption Day after 589 days of suspense. While my 2 yo daughter’s adoption was a moment of triumph, the cold, empty courtroom symbolized the system’s detachment from the lived experiences of marginalized families.

National Adoption Day often serves as a time to highlight stories of joy and family unification. Yet, behind the scenes, the obstacles faced by children in foster care and the families that support them tell a more complex story—one that demands attention and action. For those of us who have navigated the foster care system as caregivers, the systemic indifference and disparities experienced by marginalized children and families, particularly within BIPOC and disability communities, remain glaringly unresolved.

Keep Reading Show less
Framing "Freedom"

hands holding a sign that reads "FREEDOM"

Photo Credit: gpointstudio

Framing "Freedom"

The idea of “freedom” is important to Americans. It’s a value that resonates with a lot of people, and consistently ranks among the most important. It’s a uniquely powerful motivator, with broad appeal across the political spectrum. No wonder, then, that we as communicators often appeal to the value of freedom when making a case for change.

But too often, I see people understand values as magic words that can be dropped into our communications and work exactly the way we want them to. Don’t get me wrong: “freedom” is a powerful word. But simply mentioning freedom doesn’t automatically lead everyone to support the policies we want or behave the way we’d like.

Keep Reading Show less
Hands resting on another.

Amid headlines about Epstein, survivors’ voices remain overlooked. This piece explores how restorative justice offers CSA survivors healing and choice.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

What Do Epstein’s Victims Need?

Jeffrey Epstein is all over the news, along with anyone who may have known about, enabled, or participated in his systematic child sexual abuse. Yet there is significantly less information and coverage on the perspectives, stories and named needs of these survivors themselves. This is almost always the case for any type of coverage on incidences of sexual violence – we first ask “how should we punish the offender?”, before ever asking “what does the survivor want?” For way too long, survivors of sexual violence, particularly of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), have been cast to the wayside, treated like witnesses to crimes committed against the state, rather than the victims of individuals that have caused them enormous harm. This de-emphasis on direct survivors of CSA is often presented as a form of “protection” or “respect for their privacy” and while keeping survivors safe is of the utmost importance, so is the centering and meeting of their needs, even when doing so means going against the grain of what the general public or criminal legal system think are conventional or acceptable responses to violence. Restorative justice (RJ) is one of those “unconventional” responses to CSA and yet there is a growing number of survivors who are naming it as a form of meeting their needs for justice and accountability. But what is restorative justice and why would a CSA survivor ever want it?

“You’re the most powerful person I’ve ever known and you did not deserve what I did to you.” These words were spoken toward the end of a “victim offender dialogue”, a restorative justice process in which an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse had elected to meet face-to-face for a facilitated conversation with the person that had harmed her. This phrase was said by the man who had violently sexually abused her in her youth, as he sat directly across from her, now an adult woman. As these two people looked at each other at that moment, the shift in power became tangible, as did a dissolvement of shame in both parties. Despite having gone through a formal court process, this survivor needed more…more space to ask questions, to name the impacts this violence had and continues to have in her life, to speak her truth directly to the person that had harmed her more than anyone else, and to reclaim her power. We often talk about the effects of restorative justice in the abstract, generally ineffable and far too personal to be classifiable; but in that instant, it was a felt sense, it was a moment of undeniable healing for all those involved and a form of justice and accountability that this survivor had sought for a long time, yet had not received until that instance.

Keep Reading Show less