Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Voter ID laws pose significant barriers to transgender voters

Transgender and LGBTQ flags
Ben Hasty/Getty Images

In most parts of the country, transgender and nonbinary voters face significant barriers to the ballot box — which have only increased with the recent wave of restrictive voting laws.

In particular, requiring identification in order to cast a ballot can make voting inaccessible and even unsafe for trans and nonbinary people whose IDs don't match their name or gender. Many states also have strict and extensive processes for updating IDs, creating an additional obstacle.

To help trans and nonbinary voters navigate these rules, and in honor of Pride Month, HeadCount has partnered with VoteRiders to launch #TransPeopleVote. The initiative is part of the larger "Vote With Pride" campaign, aimed at supporting all LGBTQ voters.


HeadCount is known for encouraging voter registration at concerts and music festivals. For the Vote With Pride campaign, the organization wanted to bring that same event-based approach (plus online and social outreach) to the LGBTQ community, which is often underrepresented and disenfranchised in elections.

"HeadCount through this Vote With Pride initiative really aims to connect members of the LGBTQ community to the tools that they need to vote safely and actively engage in civic life," said Miranda Rosenblum, who is leading the campaign for HeadCount.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The campaign started last year, ahead of the 2020 election. This year HeadCount is highlighting the particular barriers trans and nonbinary voters face at the polls and providing resources to that community to help ease the voting process. During Pride Month, the #TransPeopleVote and the Vote With Pride campaigns will be front-and-center to bolster voter registration and participation for the LGBTQ community.

Thirty-six states require some form of identification in order to cast a ballot. Two dozen states have rules that impede a person's ability to update the name and gender marker on their ID. Twenty-two states have both types of laws, making it especially difficult for their trans and nonbinary residents to vote in elections.

Map of voter ID laws

In 14 states, trans and nonbinary people have to provide proof of gender affirmation surgery — an expensive operation that is inaccessible to many — in order to update the gender marker on their ID. Another 16 states require name changes to be published in newspapers, another costly ordeal.

"This kind of high barrier in order to update your identification to feel good about presenting your ID makes it really difficult for trans folks to be able to have an ID that really represents them," Rosenblum said.

Voting barriers can be even more insurmountable for people with criminal backgrounds, which disproportionately affects the LGBTQ community. Nearly one in six transgender Americans have been to prison, according to HeadCount. LGBTQ people are 2.25 times more likely to be incarcerated than other people, according to the Prison Policy Institute.

For Black transgender individuals, the incarceration rate is nearly one in two. Twenty-five states have additional restrictions around name changes for people with criminal records, often felony convictions.

If these barriers were lower, trans and nonbinary people could have a voice and make a bigger difference in elections at the local, state and federal level, especially ones with small margins of victory, Rosenblum said.

HeadCount's website provides an overview of state laws around voting and ID change requirements and recommends the steps trans and nonbinary people should take to get an updated ID before casting a ballot. If a person cannot update their ID in time for an election, the website also advises on what steps to take to ensure a safe and secure voting experience.

Because trans and nonbinary voters are more likely to experience harassment at the polls, on account of their name or gender marker not matching their gender presentation, voting by mail is often a safer option for them. But states like Arizona, Georgia and Florida have recently approved measures rolling back mail-in voting.

Through the organization's partnership with VoteRiders, there is also a free voter hotline people can text or call to receive additional assistance. The hotline is staffed by a team of voting experts who are trans-competent, Rosenblum said.

"The more education that we can provide for folks outside of the trans and nonbinary community to really understand how significant some of these barriers are — and then on the other side, the number of resources we can provide for trans and nonbinary people to have an affirming experience when they vote — it can change our democracy," Rosenblum said.

Read More

The Fragile Ceasefire in Gaza

A view of destruction as Palestinians, who returned to the city following the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, struggle to survive among ruins of destroyed buildings during cold weather in Jabalia, Gaza on January 23, 2025.

Getty Images / Anadolu

The Fragile Ceasefire in Gaza

Ceasefire agreements are like modern constitutions. They are fragile, loaded with idealistic promises, and too easily ignored. Both are also crucial to the realization of long-term regional peace. Indeed, ceasefires prevent the violence that is frequently the fuel for instability, while constitutions provide the structure and the guardrails that are equally vital to regional harmony.

More than ever, we need both right now in the Middle East.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money Makes the World Go Round Roundtable

The Committee on House Administration meets on the 15th anniversary of the SCOTUS decision on Citizens United v. FEC.

Medill News Service / Samanta Habashy

Money Makes the World Go Round Roundtable

WASHINGTON – On the 15th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and one day after President Trump’s inauguration, House Democrats made one thing certain: money determines politics, not the other way around.

“One of the terrible things about Citizens United is people feel that they're powerless, that they have no hope,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Ma.).

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Independents as peacemakers

Group of people waving small American flags at sunset.

Getty Images//Simpleimages

Independents as peacemakers

In the years ahead, independents, as candidates and as citizens, should emerge as peacemakers. Even with a new administration in Washington, independents must work on a long-term strategy for themselves and for the country.

The peacemaker model stands in stark contrast to what might be called the marriage counselor model. Independent voters, on the marriage counselor model, could elect independent candidates for office or convince elected politicians to become independents in order to secure the leverage needed to force the parties to compromise with each other. On this model, independents, say six in the Senate, would be like marriage counselors because their chief function would be to put pressure on both parties to make deals, especially when it comes to major policy bills that require 60 votes in the Senate.

Keep ReadingShow less