Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Governor suspends Tuesday's in-person voting in Wisconsin

Wisconsin voters

This is what voting in Milwaukee looked like in 2018. Now, there may not be any in-person voting there tomorrow.

Darren Hauck /Getty Images9

With just hours to go, there's still no certainty whether Wisconsinites will have to venture outside Tuesday for one of the most chaotic and potentially dangerous elections in memory.

Gov. Tony Evers issued an executive order Monday suspending the scheduled in-person voting, saying it would be irresponsible during what's projected to be the deadliest week yet in the coronavirus pandemic, which includes more than 2,300 cases across Wisconsin. Already, dozens of polling places had been abandoned and others were to be staffed by the National Guard because poll workers are staying home.

Whether the Democratic governor has the power to unilaterally postpone the election is unclear, and a Republican court challenge seemed certain.

Partisan operatives and voting rights advocates say what happens as Wisconsin conducts its voting and tabulates the results will shape elections for the rest of the year. It's been at least a century, they say, since a public health emergency has threatened to cripple the public's ability to participate in democracy and have confidence in the result.


Evers called for a day of in-person voting June 9. Until he acted, the main suspense looked to be whether the Supreme Court would step in at the last minute, not to postpone the election but to extend it — by permitting absentee ballots to be completed and delivered until next week.

Eleven mayors of Wisconsin cities have also urged state Health Services Secretary Andrea Palm to use her emergency powers to shutter all polling places Tuesday.

Of the 11 states that had primaries scheduled for this month, Wisconsin alone had been pressing ahead with in-person voting — even after the governor issued a statewide stay-at-home order. The main races are the Democratic presidential primary and a hotly contested battle for a state Supreme Court seat.

Democrats say the GOP's main interest in pressing ahead is to assure a suppressed turnout, which they are confident will help their incumbent, Daniel Kelly, fend off a well-financed challenge from liberals hoping to shift the court's ideological balance

The national and state Republican parties have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a judge's order allowing the return of absentee ballots through next Monday. Usually they must be received by election night to get counted.

The absentee extension, effectively postponing the end of the election by six days, was the biggest accommodation approved by District Judge William Conley in response to lawsuits filed by elderly and minority voters.

He also ruled last week that people who live alone did not have to get someone to witness their absentee ballots, as state law requires. But the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that decision and asserted that the Wisconsin Election Commission had offered several viable options for getting a ballot countersigned without risking health.

They include:

  1. Having the witness watch the voter mark their ballot through a window.
  2. Having people who deliver the mail or groceries sign the ballot.
  3. Having the witness watch the process over video chat and then leave the ballot outside the door or in the mailbox for the witness to come by and sign it.

Evers and the Republicans who run the Legislature initially agreed it was imperative for the election to proceed because hundreds of mayoralties, county executive posts and other local offices are on the ballot and those offices become vacant in two weeks weeks unless there's a winner.

After weeks of court challenges and partisan maneuvering as the pandemic worsened, it appeared that the election was finally going to be delayed when Evers changed course Friday and called the Legislature into a special session. But Republicans dismissed the governor's plan — which would have extended the period for absentee balloting several weeks but scrapped the in-person vote — adjoining the special meeting Saturday after a few minutes.

If the governor's order does not survive legal challenges, how many voters end up going to polling places on Tuesday and what they will find there remains unknown.

As of Monday, nearly 1.3 million absentee ballots had been requested and more than 724,000 had been returned, record-shattering numbers for the state that raised questions about the ability of election officials to process all the paper in anything close to a timely and reliable way — even if the deadlines aren't extended..

Meanwhile, a severe shortage of poll workers — who are often eldelry and therefore at risk if they catch the coronavirus — had already forced the closing of many voting sites.

In Milwaukee, which normally has 180 polling sites, officials announced Friday that there would be only five.

The National Guard was distributing supplies, including hand sanitizer, to polling sites across the state. In Madison, city workers were erecting plexiglass barriers to protect poll workers and voters were encouraged to bring their own pens to mark the ballots.


Read More

A person signing a piece of paper with other people around them.

Javon Jackson, center, was able to register to vote following passage of a 2019 Nevada law that restored voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals.

The Nation Is Missing Millions of Voters Due to Lack of Rights for Former Felons

If you gathered every American with a prison record into one contiguous territory and admitted it to the union, you would create the 12th-largest state. It would be home to at least 7 million to 8 million people and hold a dozen votes in the Electoral College.

In a close presidential race, this hypothetical state of the formerly incarcerated could decide who wins the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stickers with the words "I Voted Today."

Virginia is on its way to be the 19th jurisdiction to adopt the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, bringing the U.S. closer to electing presidents by the national popular vote.

Getty Images, EyeWolf

Virginia On The Path to Join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

NPVIC is an agreement among U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to the presidential ticket that wins the overall popular vote in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It is considered a pragmatic, voluntary state-based initiative because it aims to ensure the winner of the national popular vote wins the presidency without requiring a constitutional amendment, operating instead within the existing Electoral College framework by utilizing states' constitutional authority to appoint electors. If enough states join the NPVIC to reach a total of 270 electoral votes, the United States will effectively shift from a winner-take-all (WTA) regime to a national popular vote system for electing the President.

With Virginia's adoption, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact will be adopted by eighteen states and the District of Columbia, collectively holding 222 electoral votes. The compact requires 270 electoral votes (a majority of the 538 total) to take effect. It currently needs forty-eight more electoral votes to become active.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less