Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

One absentee ballot per voter is enough, Wisconsin decides

Madison, Wisconsin

Wisconsin has complex laws around absentee voting.

Coy St. Clair/Getty Images

Wisconsin has abandoned its plan to send voters two different absentee ballots for the presidential primary, deciding that minimizing confusion is more important than potentially violating state law.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission, with three members from each party who have deadlocked for months during an intense legal fight over culling the voter rolls, was unanimous in its decision Wednesday.


The decision reverses a plan unveiled last month by the commission staff for managing the state's unusually complex 2020 election calendar — with primaries for state and local offices before the Democratic presidential primary April 7, followed by congressional and legislative primaries Aug. 11 — in light of state laws' especially precise (and frequently skirted) deadlines for seeking and receiving absentee ballots.

The initial plan involved hundreds of town clerks printing and sending "A" ballots" (with just the presidential contenders) and "B" ballots (with the other offices and the presidential names) to 81,000 people statewide who've asked to vote absentee — then counting only the "B" forms if both of them got returned.

"This is insanity," said Democratic commissioner Ann Jacobs.

Now all the winter and spring contests will appear on one ballot — except for military and overseas voters, who will still get two to comply with federal law. The state law was similarly ignored in the last two presidential election years.

Read More

A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

The Supreme Court’s stay in Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem restores ICE authority in Los Angeles, igniting national debate over racial profiling, constitutional rights, and immigration enforcement.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

Public Safety or Profiling? Implications of Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem for Immigration Enforcement in the U.S.

Introduction

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in September 2025 to stay a lower court’s order in Vasquez Perdomo v. Noem marks a significant development in the ongoing debate over the balance between immigration enforcement and constitutional protections. The decision temporarily lifted a district court’s restrictions on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in the Los Angeles area, allowing agents to resume certain enforcement practices while litigation continues. Although the decision does not resolve the underlying constitutional issues, it does have significant implications for immigration policy, law enforcement authority, and civil liberties.

Keep ReadingShow less
For the Sake of Our Humanity: Humane Theology and America’s Crisis of Civility

Praying outdoors

ImagineGolf/Getty Images

For the Sake of Our Humanity: Humane Theology and America’s Crisis of Civility

The American experiment has been sustained not by flawless execution of its founding ideals but by the moral imagination of people who refused to surrender hope. From abolitionists to suffragists to the foot soldiers of the civil-rights movement, generations have insisted that the Republic live up to its creed. Yet today that hope feels imperiled. Coarsened public discourse, the normalization of cruelty in policy, and the corrosion of democratic trust signal more than political dysfunction—they expose a crisis of meaning.

Naming that crisis is not enough. What we need, I argue, is a recovered ethic of humaneness—a civic imagination rooted in empathy, dignity, and shared responsibility. Eric Liu, through Citizens University and his "Civic Saturday" fellows and gatherings, proposes that democracy requires a "civic religion," a shared set of stories and rituals that remind us who we are and what we owe one another. I find deep resonance between that vision and what I call humane theology. That is, a belief and moral framework that insists public life cannot flourish when empathy is starved.

Keep ReadingShow less