Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

50 global election veterans implore U.S. politicians to assure the vote

Christine Todd Whitman

Former Gov. Christine Todd Whitman of New Jersey signed the manifesto, calling for a bipartisan commitment to "enable participation by all citizens."

Cindy Ord/Getty Images

Fifty former foreign policy officials, politicians and experts at promoting democracy abroad have united behind a diplomatically worded but blunt warning: The coronavirus could rapidly incubate autocratic behavior that threatens the integrity of the presidential election.

In an open letter on Thursday, the bipartisan group urged President Trump, former Vice President Joe Biden and all other American political leaders to reaffirm their commitment to democratic principles and unite behind efforts at "ensuring that the 2020 elections can take place consistent with the Constitution and in an inclusive, transparent, secure and fair manner."

Their call comes at a time when the pandemic has dramatically complicated the conduct of primaries, with a partisan gap widening over how aggressively and expensively to reconfigure election procedures — especially to encourage more absentee voting.


The manifesto also was issued a week after Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, predicted without evidence that Trump, who is forcefully opposing efforts to expand voting by mail, would ultimately move to delay the November election — undoubtedly precipitating a constitutional crisis because presidents plainly do not have such authority.

The letter carefully avoids any references to those particulars. Instead, it asks for a bipartisan commitment to elections that "enable participation by all citizens," with Congress and the states coming up with "procedures that do not require a choice between protecting health and exercising the franchise."

That is essential not only for the preservation of American democracy, the group said, but also for maintaining the country's global credibility

"We now face a challenge greater than many of us have ever experienced, a pandemic that will destroy lives, threaten our basic institutions and test our character," the letter said. "To meet this challenge, we must live up to the great heritage that has helped the United States inspire freedom-loving people around the world."

Signers include former members of Congress of both parties and senior diplomats in both Republican and Democratic administrations. Few of the signatories are people with wide name recognition, but almost all are well-respected in the Washington world of think tanks, foreign policy conferences and good governance convenings. The most prominent person is Christine Todd Whitman, a former EPA administrator and GOP governor of New Jersey.


Read More

AI chip
a computer chip with the letter a on top of it
Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash

We Should Regulate AI to Make It Grow Faster

The debate over artificial intelligence has become divided between two powerful ideas: that we need a “moratorium” to slow AI until we can make it safe, and that regulating AI will slow the innovation we need for our economy and national security. Both concerns are legitimate. But “moratorium” and “slowing AI growth” are divisive terms: they reassure those concerned about AI's safety, economic and environmental consequences while alarming those who see AI competition and national security as urgent priorities. We need a different starting point—meaningful regulation that provides the safeguards necessary to protect people, communities and the environment while creating the conditions for AI to continue growing. The experiences of Europe and China challenge the assumption that regulation must slow AI.

China has combined increasingly detailed, technology-specific AI regulation with substantial government support for AI development. Recent studies provide evidence that this approach can promote innovation. One 2026 study of Chinese companies from 2017 through 2023 found that the creation of national AI innovation and development pilot zones significantly increased corporate digital transformation, in part through increased research and development, human capital and reduced transition costs. Another 2026 study, covering Chinese manufacturing companies from 2014 through 2024, found that the same policy significantly promoted the adoption of intelligent technologies.

Keep ReadingShow less
The History of U.S. Prevention Through Deterrence: Effective Border Policy or Humanitarian Risk?

The History of U.S. Prevention Through Deterrence: Effective Border Policy or Humanitarian Risk?

A Brief History of Prevention Through Deterrence

The U.S. Border Patrol agency has evolved greatly over the years, shifting its focus to address changing national security concerns. It was originally established in 1924 to restrict illegal immigration by Chinese and European immigrants before moving to restrict alcohol smuggling during Prohibition. The agency adopted its current focus on illegal immigration from Mexico during the 1970s, when immigration pressures coincided with a severe economic recession in the United States. In 1994, the Border Patrol released a strategy document with the support of the Clinton administration which introduced an approach to immigration known as Prevention Through Deterrence. This tactic aimed to discourage border crossings by funneling immigrants through border entry points with harsh terrain, in contrast with previous policies based on arrest and apprehension post-entry.

Successful Prevention Through Deterrence is measured by fewer encounters and apprehensions at the border, indicating that illegal attempts to enter the country have been prevented and deterred. Barriers to entry are policed by a range of physical infrastructure like fences, vehicle barriers, and other blockades designed to stop illegal foot and vehicle traffic. These measures are supported by camera- and thermal-based surveillance systems as well as measures like deportation and criminal charges which impose legal consequences on migrants. The focus of Prevention Through Deterrence operations themselves is twofold: establishing control of high-traffic border sectors and using security measures to enable the seizure of contraband.

Keep ReadingShow less
A microphone in the foreground and a crowd, blurry in the background.

INC ‘26 gathered independent leaders in D.C. to unveil a seven-candidate slate, a Fulcrum Caucus strategy and new tools for corruption-free governance.

Getty Images, uschools

Independent Movement Unites at INC ’26 to Build National Power

From September 23–25, leaders from across the American independent political movement gathered at the JW Marriott in Washington, D.C., for the fourth Independent National Convention (INC ’26). Produced by United Independents, the event brought together hundreds of participants representing political reform organizations, independent campaigns, alternative parties, civic initiatives and grassroots organizing efforts.

The gathering reflected the breadth of activity outside the traditional two-party system while addressing a persistent challenge: translating America's large independent constituency into greater political representation, institutional capacity, and coordinated action.

Keep ReadingShow less
Automobiles wait in line to cross the São Sebastião Channel in Brazil

Automobiles wait in line to cross the São Sebastião Channel in Brazil

Hugo Balta

How a Brazilian Island's Automation Model Offers a Blueprint for Overwhelmed U.S. Hotspots

Hugo Balta is currently reporting from Brazil, exploring how the country's efforts to strengthen democracy, expand civic participation, and address environmental challenges may hold valuable insights for the United States.

For decades, some of the world's most popular ecotourism destinations have faced a simple but persistent challenge: a relatively small local tax base must support infrastructure and environmental protection for millions of visitors. When tourism costs fall disproportionately on residents, roads, sanitation systems, and natural resources can become strained. Increasingly, governments are addressing that imbalance through "user-pays" conservation fees that shift a portion of those costs to travelers.

Keep ReadingShow less