Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

50 global election veterans implore U.S. politicians to assure the vote

Christine Todd Whitman

Former Gov. Christine Todd Whitman of New Jersey signed the manifesto, calling for a bipartisan commitment to "enable participation by all citizens."

Cindy Ord/Getty Images

Fifty former foreign policy officials, politicians and experts at promoting democracy abroad have united behind a diplomatically worded but blunt warning: The coronavirus could rapidly incubate autocratic behavior that threatens the integrity of the presidential election.

In an open letter on Thursday, the bipartisan group urged President Trump, former Vice President Joe Biden and all other American political leaders to reaffirm their commitment to democratic principles and unite behind efforts at "ensuring that the 2020 elections can take place consistent with the Constitution and in an inclusive, transparent, secure and fair manner."

Their call comes at a time when the pandemic has dramatically complicated the conduct of primaries, with a partisan gap widening over how aggressively and expensively to reconfigure election procedures — especially to encourage more absentee voting.


The manifesto also was issued a week after Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, predicted without evidence that Trump, who is forcefully opposing efforts to expand voting by mail, would ultimately move to delay the November election — undoubtedly precipitating a constitutional crisis because presidents plainly do not have such authority.

The letter carefully avoids any references to those particulars. Instead, it asks for a bipartisan commitment to elections that "enable participation by all citizens," with Congress and the states coming up with "procedures that do not require a choice between protecting health and exercising the franchise."

That is essential not only for the preservation of American democracy, the group said, but also for maintaining the country's global credibility

"We now face a challenge greater than many of us have ever experienced, a pandemic that will destroy lives, threaten our basic institutions and test our character," the letter said. "To meet this challenge, we must live up to the great heritage that has helped the United States inspire freedom-loving people around the world."

Signers include former members of Congress of both parties and senior diplomats in both Republican and Democratic administrations. Few of the signatories are people with wide name recognition, but almost all are well-respected in the Washington world of think tanks, foreign policy conferences and good governance convenings. The most prominent person is Christine Todd Whitman, a former EPA administrator and GOP governor of New Jersey.


Read More

Business meeting, blurred background and people in office for teamwork, collaboration and planning

Another recruitment drive won’t fix a nonprofit board. A practical guide to sharing real decision-making power with diverse members: acknowledge, affirm, act.

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images

Before Recruiting Diverse Board Members, Examine Who Holds Power

Nonprofit leaders keep asking me where they will find the next generation of diverse board talent. My question is what those leaders will be allowed to change once they arrive. In this piece, I outline concrete steps boards can take to ensure diverse members have real opportunities to shape organizational decision-making and to translate good intentions into meaningful progress.

In my board service and consulting work, I hear the concern from executives and grassroots activists alike. They worry about recruiting successors, sustaining funding, and governing organizations whose work increasingly depends on partnerships beyond their own walls. I share those concerns. I also wonder whether another recruitment initiative will solve what troubles them.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

jimfeng/Getty Images

Pennsylvania’s Bipartisan Exchange Is Rebuilding Trust in Governance

The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics has nearly 40 years of experience working with legislators from different political parties, and it is building on this history by drawing on lessons from the successful American Congressional Exchange model, begun in 2018 at the Bipartisan Policy Center, and from state exchanges now underway in Minnesota and Michigan. The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, in collaboration with the Bridge Alliance, has launched the Pennsylvania Legislative Exchange.

This state-based, systematic approach is designed to foster better relationships and build trust across the political aisle with the following guiding principles:

Keep ReadingShow less
Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection

DOJ lawsuits in Alaska and California preview post-Election Day fights over certification and seating winners. Here’s how officials and voters can prepare.

Aitor Diago / Getty Images

The Lawsuits Will Lose. The Delays Will Still Win.

Less than two weeks before Election Day, President Trump’s Justice Department asked a federal court to stop Alaska from certifying its U.S. Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses to Democrat Mary Peltola. The lawsuit claims that a second candidate on the ballot, Daniel J. Sullivan, will confuse voters. That argument went nowhere in June, when the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the state had no legal way to remove him from the ballot. Asked about the suit, the president took credit. “I’m the one that said do it,” he told reporters.

Alongside the Alaska suit, the Trump administration sued California to keep the state from counting mail ballots from 20,000 people it calls “likely” noncitizens. Over the summer, the Department of Homeland Security put that number at 190,000. Legal experts expect both suits to fail, as so many suits like them have. Still, Alaska and California give us an early look at what the weeks after November 3rd could bring: recount demands, calls to review or throw out ballots, and pressure to delay seating winners.

Keep ReadingShow less