Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

50 global election veterans implore U.S. politicians to assure the vote

Christine Todd Whitman

Former Gov. Christine Todd Whitman of New Jersey signed the manifesto, calling for a bipartisan commitment to "enable participation by all citizens."

Cindy Ord/Getty Images

Fifty former foreign policy officials, politicians and experts at promoting democracy abroad have united behind a diplomatically worded but blunt warning: The coronavirus could rapidly incubate autocratic behavior that threatens the integrity of the presidential election.

In an open letter on Thursday, the bipartisan group urged President Trump, former Vice President Joe Biden and all other American political leaders to reaffirm their commitment to democratic principles and unite behind efforts at "ensuring that the 2020 elections can take place consistent with the Constitution and in an inclusive, transparent, secure and fair manner."

Their call comes at a time when the pandemic has dramatically complicated the conduct of primaries, with a partisan gap widening over how aggressively and expensively to reconfigure election procedures — especially to encourage more absentee voting.


The manifesto also was issued a week after Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, predicted without evidence that Trump, who is forcefully opposing efforts to expand voting by mail, would ultimately move to delay the November election — undoubtedly precipitating a constitutional crisis because presidents plainly do not have such authority.

The letter carefully avoids any references to those particulars. Instead, it asks for a bipartisan commitment to elections that "enable participation by all citizens," with Congress and the states coming up with "procedures that do not require a choice between protecting health and exercising the franchise."

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

That is essential not only for the preservation of American democracy, the group said, but also for maintaining the country's global credibility

"We now face a challenge greater than many of us have ever experienced, a pandemic that will destroy lives, threaten our basic institutions and test our character," the letter said. "To meet this challenge, we must live up to the great heritage that has helped the United States inspire freedom-loving people around the world."

Signers include former members of Congress of both parties and senior diplomats in both Republican and Democratic administrations. Few of the signatories are people with wide name recognition, but almost all are well-respected in the Washington world of think tanks, foreign policy conferences and good governance convenings. The most prominent person is Christine Todd Whitman, a former EPA administrator and GOP governor of New Jersey.

Read More

The Fragile Ceasefire in Gaza

A view of destruction as Palestinians, who returned to the city following the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, struggle to survive among ruins of destroyed buildings during cold weather in Jabalia, Gaza on January 23, 2025.

Getty Images / Anadolu

The Fragile Ceasefire in Gaza

Ceasefire agreements are like modern constitutions. They are fragile, loaded with idealistic promises, and too easily ignored. Both are also crucial to the realization of long-term regional peace. Indeed, ceasefires prevent the violence that is frequently the fuel for instability, while constitutions provide the structure and the guardrails that are equally vital to regional harmony.

More than ever, we need both right now in the Middle East.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money Makes the World Go Round Roundtable

The Committee on House Administration meets on the 15th anniversary of the SCOTUS decision on Citizens United v. FEC.

Medill News Service / Samanta Habashy

Money Makes the World Go Round Roundtable

WASHINGTON – On the 15th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and one day after President Trump’s inauguration, House Democrats made one thing certain: money determines politics, not the other way around.

“One of the terrible things about Citizens United is people feel that they're powerless, that they have no hope,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Ma.).

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Independents as peacemakers

Group of people waving small American flags at sunset.

Getty Images//Simpleimages

Independents as peacemakers

In the years ahead, independents, as candidates and as citizens, should emerge as peacemakers. Even with a new administration in Washington, independents must work on a long-term strategy for themselves and for the country.

The peacemaker model stands in stark contrast to what might be called the marriage counselor model. Independent voters, on the marriage counselor model, could elect independent candidates for office or convince elected politicians to become independents in order to secure the leverage needed to force the parties to compromise with each other. On this model, independents, say six in the Senate, would be like marriage counselors because their chief function would be to put pressure on both parties to make deals, especially when it comes to major policy bills that require 60 votes in the Senate.

Keep ReadingShow less