Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Latest lawsuit seeks to make Louisiana relax its voting rules for fall

Louisiana Gov. Jon Bel Edwards and President Donald Trump

Gov. Jon Bel Edwards, at the White House in April, says he's open to easing the regulations again for voting absntee.

Pool/Getty Images

The courthouse crusade to make it easier to vote in the presidential election has been revived in reliably red Louisiana.

Voting rights groups sued Monday to compel the state to allow sickness or fear of getting sick as a reason for using an absentee ballot and to extend its timetable for early in-person voting. They argue both easements are constitutionally required during the coronavirus pandemic, which by some measures has struck Louisiana as hard as any other state.

The odds of quick and clear success appear long, however. Previous state and federal lawsuits, seeking to make the rules even more permissive than the state agreed to for last month's presidential primary and municipal elections, went nowhere.


Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards and Republican Secretary of State Kyle Ardoin agreed to an emergency decree for the primary that added six days of early voting and said fear of Covid-19 or a positive test were sufficient reasons to vote through the mail.

The new suit was filed at the federal courthouse in Baton Rouge by the same groups that sued in the spring — the NAACP and the progressive Power Coalition for Equity and Justice. They suggested those arrangements would be only minimally sufficient for the general election.

But the state has said nothing about replicating that plan, or coming up with a different one, and the Legislature has signaled it is done for the year.

The governor's office responded to the suit by saying he'd be open to ordering a repeat of the July rules if the top elections official asks for that.

For now, Louisiana is among just seven states standing by their usual curbs on voting from home. Mail ballots are allowed only for those 65 and older, hospitalized or far from home on election day.

As a result, just 3 percent of the vote was cast absentee in the 2018 midterm.

While the democratic rights of the state's 2.9 million voters are in the balance, the outcome of Louisiana's marquee elections this fall are not. Republicans have carried the state with ease five straight times, including President Trump's 20-point win four years ago, and the GOP is essentially a lock to hold a Senate seat and five of six House districts. It's unlikely the state's unique December runoff system will need to be used, except for some legislative contests.


Read More

KY Advocates Continue to Push for Felony Voting Rights Restoration

As of April 2025, people convicted of a felony in Maine, Vermont, and Washington, D.C. retained the right to vote while incarcerated, according to Ballotpedia.

(Adobe Stock)

KY Advocates Continue to Push for Felony Voting Rights Restoration

Kentucky has barred more than 158,000 of its residents from voting.

Most have previous felony convictions and despite a 2019 executive order by Gov. Andy Beshear restoring the voting rights of some Kentuckians with past felonies, the Commonwealth still denies the right to vote to more prior felons than nearly any other state.

Keep ReadingShow less
American flag
American flag
SimpleImages/Getty Images

From the Ashes, What Would A ‘Re-Founding’ of American Democracy Look Like?

Things rarely change unless there is a crisis. The present administration has certainly precipitated unprecedented challenges at all levels of our government. With the likelihood that the crisis will only deepen, the more pertinent question is how far will the destruction go?

A society’s capacity for change is often proportionate to the disaster’s depth. From the ashes of the Civil War, the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments would go on to play such an important role in the American polity that their passage is considered by some to be a “Second Founding” of American democracy. Amidst the backdrop of decades of political decay and voter cynicism due to gerrymandering, inequities in voter representation, and political gridlock, we do not have the luxury of hoping after the current administration that “things will go back to normal.” Depending on the scale of the mounting assaults challenging our Constitutional system—made even more dire with concerns that future elections may be disrupted or manipulated—we must be prepared to harness a potential groundswell to pass reforms that update our democracy in the most concrete and durable ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
NRF Moves to Defend Utah’s Fair Map Against Gerrymandering Lawsuit

USA Election Collage With The State Map Of Utah.

Getty Images

NRF Moves to Defend Utah’s Fair Map Against Gerrymandering Lawsuit

On Wednesday, February 11, the National Redistricting Foundation (NRF) asked a federal court to join a newly filed lawsuit to protect Utah’s new, fair congressional map and defend our system of checks and balances.

The NRF is a non‑profit foundation whose mission is to dismantle unfair electoral maps and create a redistricting system grounded in democratic values. By helping to create more just and representative electoral districts across the country, the organization aims to restore the public’s faith in a true representative democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Maxwell Is the Prosecutable Person
Ghislaine Maxwell, September 20, 2013
(Photo by Paul Zimmerman/WireImage)

Maxwell Is the Prosecutable Person

A story like Jeffrey Epstein’s is easy to treat as an anomaly—one ambitious man, one grotesque circle, one horrific chapter of American life that many would rather seal shut and forget. But I keep coming back to a harder question underneath it: do we actually believe in equal accountability, or only in accountability for the people we can easily punish?

This isn’t a left-right question. It’s a legitimacy question. A democracy can’t function if power purchases are exempted and proximity is treated as guilt. The details change depending on the arena—policing, corruption, finance, exploitation—but a familiar pattern repeats: our institutions tend to prosecute what is simple, visible, and winnable, and struggle to reach what is complex, insulated, and costly.

Keep ReadingShow less