Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Democrats hit back at Trump campaign in Pennsylvania countersuit

Pennsylvania voting

Voters in Pennsylvania, including Philadelphians who participated in the June primary, are the subject of competing lawsuits by the Trump campaign and Democrats.

Bastiaan Slabbers/Getty Images

Two weeks after the Trump campaign filed its first voting-by-mail lawsuit, hoping for more restrictive absentee balloting rules in bellwether Pennsylvania, Democrats have struck back with a countersuit looking to loosen those same processes.

The state party, 15 politicians and Democratic Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, sued in state court to make the state relax five of its vote-by-mail rules in time for November — when turnout will shape who wins the state's 20 electoral votes.


The lawsuit would compel the state to:

  • Permit counties to collect absentee ballot envelopes at drop boxes.
  • Assure ballots postmarked before the polls closed get counted, whereas now they must be received at election offices by then.
  • Require the state to contact voters whose mail-in ballots were submitted incorrectly in order to give them an opportunity to fix their ballots by the end of Election Day.
  • Make the state count so-called naked ballots, those that do not arrive inside the secrecy envelope that's meant to shield the identity of voters.
  • Uphold the current residency requirement that voters may only serve as poll watchers in the county in which they live.

These changes are in direct opposition to the suit filed in federal court at the end of June by President Trump's re-election campaign, which seeks to block the use of mail-in ballot drop boxes, disqualify mail-in ballots that were not returned in the required secrecy envelope and expand the area voters can work as poll watchers to outside their home counties.

Pennsylvania Democrats argue in their suit that mail-in ballots are completely safe and an important health measure during the coronavirus pandemic.

The filing even included screenshots of Trump's recent tweets in which he made unsubstantiated claims about mail-in ballot fraud, argued the stakes in the upcoming general election "could not be higher," and wrote that inconsistencies in voting processes create "heightened space for mischievous havoc and genuine concern."

The Democrats acknowledged the primary in June didn't go down without a hitch, with local media reporting tens of thousands of mail ballots arriving at election offices as much as a week late. They argued that the primary was "the test run for the implementation of the Act 77 changes."

Act 77 was a historic reform to the state's election code, eliminating the excuse requirements for voting absentee and allowing mail-in ballot drop boxes that could be stationed in various public locations in each of the state's counties. It was enacted with bipartisan support in Harrisburg last fall.

The new law resulted in more than 1.8 million voters requesting a mail ballot, suggesting that the share of votes that will be cast by mail statewide in November is sure to increase.

Trump carried Pennsylvania by less than 1 percentage point, or about 44,000 votes, but he now trails former Vice President Joe Bien in recent polling. Even a slight change to the state's voting system could significantly impact a candidate's performance in November.

The countersuit comes as Democrats vowed to spend more than $10 million to fight for voting rights in battleground states that they say have been victim to decades-long voter suppression campaigns by Republicans. Republicans and Trump's re-election campaign responded with their own plan to fight to repel a series of voting rights lawsuits that Democrats have filed in battleground states across the nation.

Read More

The Responsibility of the First Vote

Primary voting, Michigan

Elaine Cromie/Getty Images

The Responsibility of the First Vote

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. To learn about the many NextGen initiatives we are leading, click HERE.

We asked Nathaly Suquinagua, a bilingual multimedia journalist with a B.A. in Journalism and a minor in Dance from Temple University, and a cohort member with the Fulcrum Fellowship, to share her thoughts on what democracy means to her and her perspective on its current health.

Keep ReadingShow less
From Red vs. Blue to Common Sense: Solving Money in Politics Together

United States flag, Red representing the Republican party, and the Blue representing the Democratic party.

Getty Images//Stock Photo

From Red vs. Blue to Common Sense: Solving Money in Politics Together

Despite the division in our politics, Americans across the aisle agree on two essential issues: there’s a problem with the role of money in politics (the public’s #1 concern), and there is too little cooperation between our leaders in solving the nation’s problems (the #5 concern). These two issues erode trust in our institutions and the integrity of our elections, and leave communities and voters across the country feeling sidelined.

That’s why we, two state legislators from opposite sides of the aisle, have come together. Unchecked political spending and partisan gridlock hurt government where it is intended to be most accessible: in our local communities.

Keep ReadingShow less
Defend Democracy Against Bombardments on the Elections Front –A Three-Part Series
Voted printed papers on white surface

Defend Democracy Against Bombardments on the Elections Front –A Three-Part Series

In Part 1, Pat Merloe examines the impact of the political environment, the necessity of constitutional defense against power-grabbing, and the detrimental effects of proof of citizenship on voting.

Part One: Bellicose Environment, Constitutional Infringements, and Disenfranchisement by Proof of Citizenship

The intense MAGA barrage against genuine elections, leading up to 2024’s voting, paused briefly after Election Day - not because there was diminished MAGA hostility towards typically trustworthy processes and results, but mainly because Donald Trump won. Much valuable work took place to protect last year’s polls, and much more will be needed as we head toward 2026, 2028, and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Against the Present: The Future of Feminism Is Now
silhouette of personr
Photo by Miguel Bruna on Unsplash

Against the Present: The Future of Feminism Is Now

Democracy in America is being driven into the shadows. Anyone in doubt need only pause to reflect on the events of June, when the military parade of the autocrat-in-chief in DC coincided with a manhunt for an assassin of lawmakers in Minnesota. Lawmakers who had stood up for reproductive freedom, as well as other progressive issues.

Let us say their names. Melissa Hortman. John Hoffman. They died by gun violence for what they believed in, and as a result of what they had worked for as elected officials. The gunman who robbed us of them also killed Hortman’s husband, Mark Hortman.

Keep ReadingShow less