Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Americans much more unified because of the virus, poll finds

Pandemic in the United States
Peter Zelei Images/Getty Images

Times of crisis often bring people together. And American solidarity has grown in the face of the coronavirus outbreak, a new poll shows.

A vast majority of Americans feel the country has become more unified by its most serious public health emergency in a century, according to a survey released Friday by the nonprofit More in Common, which is focused on combating polarization. But most are also scared about their health and an impending economic depression.

Given how fractured and tribal the country's politics have become in recent decades, the survey offers the slimmest of silver linings: The electorate is capable of finding common ground — it just may take them first confronting a life-altering pandemic.


"While these findings are encouraging, there is nothing inevitable about this new trajectory," Stephen Hawkins, More in Common's research director, said in releasing the findings. "As the pandemic worsens, whether we come together or fall apart will depend on steady leadership, clear values, and considerate choices by all of us."

More in Common partnered with YouGov to survey 2,000 Americans of various backgrounds to see how the coronavirus has affected their perceptions of polarization. The group then compared the results to findings of its widely praised and often cited "Hidden Tribes" report on the American electorate from two years ago.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The new study found 90 percent believe "we're all in this together" — compared to 63 percent in 2018 — rather than "it's everyone for themselves." Almost half (46 percent) of those surveyed described the country as more unified now than before Covid-19 became the nation's almost singular focus.

Similarly, in the past two years, the share of people who say the United States is "very divided" has shrunk to 22 percent — a huge drop of 40 points. More than four-fifths of Americans agree we have "more in common than what divides us."

But this greater feeling of unity has not assuaged fears of an economic collapse. More than three-quarters believe a depression is more likely than not. Democrats are more fearful, with 88 percent seeing such a severe downturn compared to 62 percent of Republicans.

Through its 2018 report, More in Common identified seven "Hidden Tribes" to describe the country's political makeup. Two-thirds fall within one of the four tribes in the "exhausted majority" — traditional liberals, passive liberals, politically disengaged and moderates. The rest are represented in "the wings," or the extreme ends of the political spectrum: progressive activists, traditional conservatives and devoted conservatives.

More in Common's recent poll found those in the progressive and conservative extremes perceive the coronavirus crisis very differently. Progressive activists are three times more likely to believe they will contract Covid-19 than devoted conservatives. On the other hand, two-thirds of conservatives feel more grateful to live in the United States. Only 4 percent of progressive activists said the same.

Hawkins described the rapid shift in the public's perception of its own divisions.

"This could be a moment that brings Americans together to the extent that we can start working on harder problems," he said. "Can we preserve these dynamics with the focus on the right priorities? If we can do that, we might be on a new trajectory."

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less
Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Peter Wood is an anthropologist and president of the National Association of Scholars. He believes—like many Americans on the right—that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and the January 6th riots were incited by the left in collusion with the FBI. He’s also the author of a new book called Wrath: America Enraged, which wrestles with our politics of anger and counsels conservatives on how to respond to perceived aggression.

Where does America go from here? In this episode, Peter joins Ciaran O’Connor for a frank conversation about the role of anger in our politics as well as the nature of truth, trust, and conspiracy theories.

Keep ReadingShow less