Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Democratic hopefuls must answer: How they will save our democracy?

Democratic hopefuls must answer: How they will save our democracy?

"It's time for the remaining candidates to get serious about the task at hand," argues Helen Butler.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Butler is executive director of the Georgia Coalition for the Peoples' Agenda, a nonprofit organization that advocates for voting rights and civil rights.

Let's not sugar-coat the situation: Our democracy is under attack.

When President Trump disregards Congress' oversight authority, our democracy is under attack.

When state election officials suppress voter turnout in communities of color, our democracy is under attack.

When corporate donors anonymously funnel untold millions of dollars into campaigns, our democracy is under attack.

As Atlanta prepares to host Wednesday night's Democratic presidential debate, it's time to put the national spotlight on one topic that hasn't received enough attention during this campaign: What are the candidates going to do to protect and strengthen our democracy?


So, while topics such as health care, national security, immigration and where the candidates stand on impeachment are critical and worthy of discussion, none of those issues will matter much in the long run if this great 243-year-old American experiment in democracy fails.

Our democracy is facing grave challenges at both the national and local levels. In Georgia, we've seen the secretary of state announce plans to purge 330,000 infrequent voters from the rolls under the guise of "routine maintenance." We've seen polling places in communities of color shut down, making it more difficult for residents in those areas to vote. We've seen thousands of legitimate absentee ballots suppressed because they didn't meet an "exact match" standard — an unjust requirement that violates the Voting Rights Act and the National Voter Registration Act and as well as the First and 14th amendments.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

It is well past time for the candidates to talk about how they will fix our broken political system. When the candidates take the stage at Tyler Perry Studios in Atlanta, it will be the first time that they'll appear together with less than a year until Election Day.

This is no time for grandstanding and trying to create a debate "moment."

It's time for the remaining candidates to get serious about the task at hand. It's time for them to talk frankly about our country's greatest existential threat.

Moderators Rachel Maddow, Andrea Mitchell, Kristen Welker and Ashley Parker are not representing debate hosts MSNBC and The Washington Post. They are standing in for all of us, their fellow citizens.

The moderators have a responsibility to ask the candidates: How will they protect and expand access to voter rights and ensure that everyone's voice is heard?

How will they stem the undue influence of wealthy and corporate interests in our elections?

How will they restore the checks and balances so important to our system of government?

Our democracy is under attack. How will these men and women defend it?

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less