• Home
  • Opinion
  • Quizzes
  • Redistricting
  • Sections
  • About Us
  • Voting
  • Events
  • Civic Ed
  • Campaign Finance
  • Directory
  • Election Dissection
  • Fact Check
  • Glossary
  • Independent Voter News
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Subscriptions
  • Log in
Leveraging Our Differences
  • news & opinion
    • Big Picture
      • Civic Ed
      • Ethics
      • Leadership
      • Leveraging big ideas
      • Media
    • Business & Democracy
      • Corporate Responsibility
      • Impact Investment
      • Innovation & Incubation
      • Small Businesses
      • Stakeholder Capitalism
    • Elections
      • Campaign Finance
      • Independent Voter News
      • Redistricting
      • Voting
    • Government
      • Balance of Power
      • Budgeting
      • Congress
      • Judicial
      • Local
      • State
      • White House
    • Justice
      • Accountability
      • Anti-corruption
      • Budget equity
    • Columns
      • Beyond Right and Left
      • Civic Soul
      • Congress at a Crossroads
      • Cross-Partisan Visions
      • Democracy Pie
      • Our Freedom
  • Pop Culture
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
      • American Heroes
      • Ask Joe
      • Celebrity News
      • Comedy
      • Dance, Theatre & Film
      • Diversity, Inclusion & Belonging
      • Faithful & Mindful Living
      • Music, Poetry & Arts
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Your Take
  • events
  • About
      • Mission
      • Advisory Board
      • Staff
      • Contact Us
Sign Up
  1. Home>
  2. Big Picture>
  3. election 2020>

Debate gives Bloomberg airtime to detail (and defend) his democracy reform ideas

Sara Swann
https://twitter.com/saramswann?lang=en
February 19, 2020
Mike Bloomberg

The Las Vegas debate will be Mike Bloomberg's first, giving him the opportunity to reveal his position on democracy reform.

Brett Carlsen/Getty Images

Mike Bloomberg's debate debut offers him an opportunity to explain where he stands on most of the main agenda items in the democracy reform movement, a topic on which he's revealed little so far.

And if he doesn't volunteer his views, starting with his attitude as a self-funding billionaire candidate toward regulating the campaign giving and spending by others, his presidential rivals will have every incentive to press him hard Wednesday night.

Of the 17 most prominent proposals for improving the way democracy works — not only on campaign finance but also on access to the ballot box, election security, political ethics and revamping our governing systems — Bloomberg has staked out a clear position on just 10.



Made with Flourish

That's fewer than any of the five others who qualified for the nationally televised two-hour forum, starting at 9 p.m. Eastern in Las Vegas. One of Bloomberg's main, albeit struggling, rivals for the more centrist lane in the Democratic primaries, former Vice President Joe Biden, has only revealed his stance on 11 of the issues.

The nationally televised forum comes as Bloomberg has surged into the top tier in national polling, almost entirely thanks to his more than $300 million spent selling himself on TV and online. The debate marks the first time he'll be confronted by many of his opponents in person, and they are sure to attack him over his record as mayor of New York and the muscular use of his enormous fortune to promote a varnished version of his views.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

While the range of areas for potential confrontation is vast, there's reason to believe the plight of the dysfunctional democracy will be discussed as it's seldom been in the eight previous debates.

Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont has become the front-runner in part by castigating the behavior of billionaires at every turn, and Bloomberg will be an obvious foil for a fresh barrage of angry talk about the corrupting influence of big money on both campaigning and governance.

The three remaining candidates on stage — former Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind., Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts — have all formally pledged that their opening legislative priority as president would be a bill revamping the political system and boosting government ethics. So any one of them could press Bloomberg on whether he would do the same.

Despite heavy criticism for tapping the $60 billion fortune he's amassed as a media mogul for the entirety of his campaign — he's not soliciting or accepting any donations — Bloomberg has been silent on what if anything he'd do to reduce the influence of money in politics.

All the other debaters, for example, support somehow "overturning" the Supreme Court's 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. FEC, which has allowed for virtually unlimited political spending. They also support robust programs of public financing for federal campaigns and requiring more transparency from the "dark money" groups who currently don't have to disclose their donors. But Bloomberg has not weighed in on any of these issues.

Since he is only spending his own money, Bloomberg boasts that his would be an administration completely insulated from the influence of special interests. And so, unlike the others on stage, he has made no promises about rebuffing the donations from lobbyists that normally pour into presidential coffers.

Bloomberg also has not embraced transparency the way many of the others have. On top of releasing their own federal tax returns, they favor requiring all presidential candidates to do so. Bloomberg has said he would make his IRS filings public only if he wins the Democratic nomination.

Presidential candidates also have to file personal financial disclosure reports with the Federal Election Commission that include in broad ranges their assets, income and debts. But the FEC has granted Bloomberg, who only entered the race in November, two deadline extensions, so his report won't be available until March 20. While such an extension is not uncommon, it means voters won't see details about Bloomberg's finances until more than halfway through the Democratic primaries.

Like all the others in the debate, Bloomberg wants to ease access to the ballot box two ways. He would revive the Voting Rights Act's system for making states with histories of electoral discrimination get federal permission before changing any voting rules. And he would nationalize the requirement, which is steadily spreading in the states, that eligible people are automatically registered to vote whenever they do business with another government agency, such as a motor vehicle bureau.

Bloomberg and the other candidates (except Biden) favor early voting and same-day voter registration.

He would restore voting rights to felons as soon as they have served their sentences — putting him in the same company as all the others except Sanders, who would allow people to vote while imprisoned.

To ensure election integrity and security, Bloomberg would mandate a voting paper trail and post-election audits in every state. He would also compel states to establish independent redistricting commissions to draw the congressional district boundaries after the census each decade. These stances are in line with the other Democrats.

As of Friday, Bloomberg's campaign website included a plan for political reform, which was noted as a "top priority." It mainly touted his 12-year record as mayor, ending in 2013, of increasing public campaign subsidies for local candidates and strengthening ethics laws. The brief was removed from his roster of more than 30 policy pages over the weekend. His campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

Bloomberg does set himself apart from his rivals on two issues, though. He is opposed to abolishing the Electoral College in favor of the popular vote. And he has no interest in changing the Supreme Court's makeup by adding justices to the bench or implementing term limits. Biden is the only other Democrat in agreement with Bloomberg on these issues, although some of the others say they are open to such proposals without making a firm endorsement.

The debate is being hosted by NBC, MSNBC and the Nevada Independent. Bloomberg's spot on stage is largely thanks to a rule change by the Democratic National Committee. Previously, candidates qualified by showing strength of support through donors and polls. But at the end of January, the DNC eliminated the unique donor threshold, opening the stage to Bloomberg as soon as he proved the viability of his candidacy in a series of national surveys.

Several Democrats claim the DNC made this change just to benefit Bloomberg. FEC data shows that just two days before entering the race, he gave $320,000 in three installments (the maximum amount allowed) to the national parry — his first donation to the committee in more than two decades. No one else on the debate stage has given to the DNC this election.

From Your Site Articles
  • Why Mike Bloomberg's candidacy is bad for democracy - The Fulcrum ›
  • Steyer, Bloomberg pledge $60 million to boost turnout ›
  • Ending voting discrimination key to Bloomberg reform plan - The ... ›
Related Articles Around the Web
  • Here's what Michael Bloomberg joining the debate stage means for ... ›
  • The stakes couldn't be higher for Mike Bloomberg at the next ... ›
  • What to expect from Mike Bloomberg's vital first debate - The ... ›
election 2020

Want to write
for The Fulcrum?

If you have something to say about ways to protect or repair our American democracy, we want to hear from you.

Submit
Get some Leverage Sign up for The Fulcrum Newsletter
Follow
Contributors

Reform in 2023: Leadership worth celebrating

Layla Zaidane

Two technology balancing acts

Dave Anderson

Reform in 2023: It’s time for the civil rights community to embrace independent voters

Jeremy Gruber

Congress’ fix to presidential votes lights the way for broader election reform

Kevin Johnson

Democrats and Republicans want the status quo, but we need to move Forward

Christine Todd Whitman

Reform in 2023: Building a beacon of hope in Boston

Henry Santana
Jerren Chang
latest News

Part IV: Reforming constitutional convention campaigns

J.H. Snider
15h

Winning GOP strategy in 2024 – back to business with immigration reform

Neil Hare
15h

Podcast: Separating news from noise

Our Staff
15h

Podcast: Deepening democracy in the states

Our Staff
27 January

Ask Joe: Fostering social activism

Joe Weston
27 January

With an eye on 2024, some states consider new protections for election workers

Barbara Rodriguez, The 19th
27 January
Videos

Video: We need more bipartisan commitment to democracy: Pennsylvania governor

Our Staff

Video: Meet the citizen activists championing primary reform

Our Staff

Video: Veterans for Political Innovation - Who we are

Our Staff

Video: Want to fight polarization? Take a vacation!

Our Staff

Video: Kevin McCarthy is Speaker, but he's got a tough job ahead

Our Staff

Video: #ListenFirst Friday End of Year

Our Staff
Podcasts

Podcast: Separating news from noise

Our Staff
15h

Podcast: Deepening democracy in the states

Our Staff
27 January

Podcast: How the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack impacted politics

Our Staff
26 January

Podcast: Why we misunderstand independent voters

Our Staff
25 January
Recommended
Part IV: Reforming constitutional convention campaigns

Part IV: Reforming constitutional convention campaigns

State
Winning GOP strategy in 2024 – back to business with immigration reform

Winning GOP strategy in 2024 – back to business with immigration reform

Big Picture
Podcast: Separating news from noise

Podcast: Separating news from noise

Podcasts
Video: We need more bipartisan commitment to democracy: Pennsylvania governor

Video: We need more bipartisan commitment to democracy: Pennsylvania governor

Podcast: Deepening democracy in the states

Podcast: Deepening democracy in the states

Podcasts
Ask Joe: Fostering social activism

Ask Joe: Fostering social activism

Pop Culture