Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Bloomberg joins other Democrats with broad plans for democracy reform

Former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg

The former New York mayor, above talking to reporters this week, is the last presidential candidate to detail his plan for fixing the system's ills.

Zach Gibson/Getty Images

Citizens would be automatically registered to vote, or they could register online or on Election Day, under a comprehensive voting rights proposal unveiled Friday by Mike Bloomberg.

He is the last of the prominent Democratic candidates for president to detail an agenda for making the democratic process work better. The plan was unveiled as Bloomberg took his campaign to Georgia for an appearance with Stacey Abrams, one of the most prominent civil rights advocates in the country.

"The right to vote is the fundamental right that protects all others, but in states around the country it is under attack," Bloomberg said in a statement released by his campaign.


Among several other elements, the plan by the billionaire media company owner and former New York City mayor would:

  • Block purging of voter registration rolls on the basis of inactivity, incomplete or improper cross-checks, or returned mail notices.
  • Require states to form independent redistricting commissions to eliminate partisan gerrymandering.
  • Provide a regular stream of federal funding for upgrading and maintaining election infrastructure.
  • Restore voting rights to felons after they are set free regardless of whether they have been able to pay all their fines and fees.

The package embraces all of the major voting proposals included in HR 1, the election and ethics overhaul the Democratic-controlled House passed last year. The Republican-controlled Senate has no interest in the legislation. All of the other Democratic presidential candidates have endorsed the voting rights provisions in that bill.

Bloomberg was scheduled to appear with Abrams at an Atlanta summit held Friday by her political action and voting rights group Fair Fight 2020, which she created after narrowly losing her 2018 bid to become the nation's first black female governor. Bloomberg last year gave $5 million to the group, which amounts to almost a quarter of its fundraising to date.

Abrams alleges that voting irregularities in 2018 included rejection of thousands of would-be voters at the polls because of minor discrepancies between their registration forms and other records.

The Bloomberg campaign's announcement touted that the "centerpiece of Mike's plan is a series of initiatives designed to tackle racial disparity in voting rights."

Eight percent of black adults are blocked from voting, it said, because of past convictions, which is four times the rate for other Americans. The announcement also noted that 36 states require voters to show some sort of ID before casting their ballots, which disproportionately prevents members of minority groups from getting to vote.

To deal with discrimination in voting, Bloomberg also proposed restoring the Voting Rights Act requirement of preapproval for any changes in areas with a history of discrimination and creating a nonpartisan commission to set federal standards for voting in federal elections to eliminate disparities across states, including voter ID requirements.

There will be no in-person explanation of his proposals at the next presidential debate, in Des Moines on Tuesday, because Bloomberg's decision to bankroll his own campaign rather than raise small-dollar donations from others has resulted in his not being invited. He is not contesting Iowa or the other early caucus and primary states but is instead investing heavily on winning delegates after that. Georgia's primary is March 24.


Read More

With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
People voting at voting booths.

A little-known interstate compact could change how the U.S. elects presidents by 2028, replacing the Electoral College with the national popular vote.

Getty Images, VIEW press

The Quiet Campaign That Could Rewrite the 2028 Election

Most Americans are unaware, but a quiet campaign in states across the country is moving toward one of the biggest changes in presidential elections since the nation was founded.

A movement called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is happening mostly out of public view and could soon change how the United States picks its president, possibly as early as 2028.

Keep ReadingShow less