Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Bloomberg joins other Democrats with broad plans for democracy reform

Former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg

The former New York mayor, above talking to reporters this week, is the last presidential candidate to detail his plan for fixing the system's ills.

Zach Gibson/Getty Images

Citizens would be automatically registered to vote, or they could register online or on Election Day, under a comprehensive voting rights proposal unveiled Friday by Mike Bloomberg.

He is the last of the prominent Democratic candidates for president to detail an agenda for making the democratic process work better. The plan was unveiled as Bloomberg took his campaign to Georgia for an appearance with Stacey Abrams, one of the most prominent civil rights advocates in the country.

"The right to vote is the fundamental right that protects all others, but in states around the country it is under attack," Bloomberg said in a statement released by his campaign.


Among several other elements, the plan by the billionaire media company owner and former New York City mayor would:

  • Block purging of voter registration rolls on the basis of inactivity, incomplete or improper cross-checks, or returned mail notices.
  • Require states to form independent redistricting commissions to eliminate partisan gerrymandering.
  • Provide a regular stream of federal funding for upgrading and maintaining election infrastructure.
  • Restore voting rights to felons after they are set free regardless of whether they have been able to pay all their fines and fees.

The package embraces all of the major voting proposals included in HR 1, the election and ethics overhaul the Democratic-controlled House passed last year. The Republican-controlled Senate has no interest in the legislation. All of the other Democratic presidential candidates have endorsed the voting rights provisions in that bill.

Bloomberg was scheduled to appear with Abrams at an Atlanta summit held Friday by her political action and voting rights group Fair Fight 2020, which she created after narrowly losing her 2018 bid to become the nation's first black female governor. Bloomberg last year gave $5 million to the group, which amounts to almost a quarter of its fundraising to date.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Abrams alleges that voting irregularities in 2018 included rejection of thousands of would-be voters at the polls because of minor discrepancies between their registration forms and other records.

The Bloomberg campaign's announcement touted that the "centerpiece of Mike's plan is a series of initiatives designed to tackle racial disparity in voting rights."

Eight percent of black adults are blocked from voting, it said, because of past convictions, which is four times the rate for other Americans. The announcement also noted that 36 states require voters to show some sort of ID before casting their ballots, which disproportionately prevents members of minority groups from getting to vote.

To deal with discrimination in voting, Bloomberg also proposed restoring the Voting Rights Act requirement of preapproval for any changes in areas with a history of discrimination and creating a nonpartisan commission to set federal standards for voting in federal elections to eliminate disparities across states, including voter ID requirements.

There will be no in-person explanation of his proposals at the next presidential debate, in Des Moines on Tuesday, because Bloomberg's decision to bankroll his own campaign rather than raise small-dollar donations from others has resulted in his not being invited. He is not contesting Iowa or the other early caucus and primary states but is instead investing heavily on winning delegates after that. Georgia's primary is March 24.

Read More

A better direction for democracy reform

Denver election judge Eric Cobb carefully looks over ballots as counting continued on Nov. 6. Voters in Colorado rejected a ranked choice voting and open primaries measure.

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

A better direction for democracy reform

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

This is the conclusion of a two-part, post-election series addressing the questions of what happened, why, what does it mean and what did we learn? Read part one.

I think there is a better direction for reform than the ranked choice voting and open primary proposals that were defeated on Election Day: combining fusion voting for single-winner elections with party-list proportional representation for multi-winner elections. This straightforward solution addresses the core problems voters care about: lack of choices, gerrymandering, lack of competition, etc., with a single transformative sweep.

Keep ReadingShow less
To-party doom loop
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America

Let’s make sense of the election results

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author of "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

Well, here are some of my takeaways from Election Day, and some other thoughts.

1. The two-party doom loop keeps getting doomier and loopier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting in Denver

A proposal to institute ranked choice voting in Colorado was rejected by voters.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Despite setbacks, ranked choice voting will continue to grow

Mantell is director of communications for FairVote.

More than 3 million people across the nation voted for better elections through ranked choice voting on Election Day, as of current returns. Ranked choice voting is poised to win majority support in all five cities where it was on the ballot, most notably with an overwhelming win in Washington, D.C. – 73 percent to 27 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Electoral College map

It's possible Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could each get 269 electoral votes this year.

Electoral College rules are a problem. A worst-case tie may be ahead.

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization. Keyssar is a Matthew W. Stirling Jr. professor of history and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His work focuses on voting rights, electoral and political institutions, and the evolution of democracies.

It’s the worst-case presidential election scenario — a 269–269 tie in the Electoral College. In our hyper-competitive political era, such a scenario, though still unlikely, is becoming increasingly plausible, and we need to grapple with its implications.

Recent swing-state polling suggests a slight advantage for Kamala Harris in the Rust Belt, while Donald Trump leads in the Sun Belt. If the final results mirror these trends, Harris wins with 270 electoral votes. But should Trump take the single elector from Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district — won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2016 — then both candidates would be deadlocked at 269.

Keep ReadingShow less