Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Conservatives attacking Americans’ First Amendment rights

Opinion

Conservatives attacking Americans’ First Amendment rights
Getty Images

Steve Corbin is Professor Emeritus of Marketing, University of Northern Iowa

I fondly recall my senior year in high school when Mary Beth Tinker, John Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt wore black armbands to their high school to protest the Vietnam War. Their suspension from school was cast around the thought that wearing armbands would disrupt learning. In a landmark Supreme Court case – Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) – justices agreed students’ rights should be protected plus they refuted the school’s stance by candidly stating, “Students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gates.”


Many of today’s GOP-oriented governors and legislators, far right-wing groups, conservative media and Republican presidential candidates have either passed or supported book banning, anti-LGBTQIA and anti-racist curriculum laws. It’s a blatant attack on the constitutional rights of students, parents, teachers, general public and book authors. Several organizations and politicians -- identified by a multitude of sources -- are named as a threat to Americans’ intellectual freedom and First Amendment rights.

Moms for Liberty (MFL) may be the most cited right-wing extremist group. Founded in 2021, MFL is referred by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) as an anti-government and conspiracy propagandist group of 120,000 members in 285 chapters throughout 44 states who, among many beliefs, are anti-LGBTQIA, anti-gender identity and anti-inclusive educational curriculum, which includes school pedagogy, social emotional learning and books. MFL has been featured on the Rush Limbaugh Show, Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight, Glenn Beck Program, Newsmax and Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly’s show. MFL is associated with several chapters of the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, 3 Percenters, Gays Against Groomers and GOP’s affiliated Heritage Foundation.

It’s quite ironic that MFL touts they are for liberty, yet are willing to strip others of their liberty to read books of interest. The American Library Association reveals of the 2,571 book titles banned for censorship in 2022, 58% were targeted for schools and 41% were aimed for adults in public libraries. Hence, the organization is not only attacking students’ First Amendment rights but also 78% of Americans who are adults. No Left Turn in Education (NLTIE) urges parents to ban LGBTQIA rights and books categorized as anti-racism, anti-police, critical race theory and comprehensive sexuality education since those concepts don’t align with their autocratic agenda. Nicole Neily, president of Parents Defending Education (PDE), has been described as a “veteran political operative affiliated with the Koch network.” PDE is a group of “corporate school privatizers going hard right to attack school boards, superintendents, principals and teachers” (Media Matters for America, Nov. 12, 2021).

According to the American Library Association’s Intellectual Freedom Blog, “No Left Turn in Education, PDE and Moms for Liberty share inflammatory claims about `radical agendas’ to disguise their desire to engage in censorship and government control of intellectual freedom.” Book banning narrows students’ cultural understanding, world view and critical thinking capability.

Finally, there’s the Goldwater Institute (GI) who proudly states their aim is to control public school’s K-12 curriculum. Individuals who are cited by multiple sources to be in concert with MFL, NLTIE, PDE and GI include: former president Donald Trump (R-FL), former U.N. Ambassador and Gov. Nikki Haley (R-SC), former Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R-AR), Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL), Gov. Kim Reynolds (R-IA), Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R-VA), Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC), Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL), Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy (OH).

America was founded on the value and importance of free expression. According to John Stuart Mill’s essay On Liberty (1859), free speech must be protected from political, economic and social tyranny. When our First Amendment rights are purposely being attacked by right-wing extremists, they are attempting to shackle the minds of children and adults plus America’s future. Bottom line: we are witnessing politicians and groups who want America to abandon its 1630’s New England Colonies democracy roots and become an authoritarian country like Russia, China and North Korea, “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves” (Matthew 7:15).

References:

  1. Jacqui Higgins-Dailey, The stakeholders of status quo, Intellectual Freedom Blog of American Library Association, March 10, 2022
  2. Moms for Liberty, Southern Poverty Law Center, 2023
  3. Olivia Little, Unmasking Moms for Liberty, Media Matters for America, Nov. 12, 2021
  4. R.J. Praker, Better dead than read: Moms for Liberty and book banking in America, David Political Review, July 19, 2023
  5. Kristina Watrobski, Parents’ rights orgs labeled `hate’ and `extremist’ groups by Southern Poverty Law Center, CBS Austin, June 7, 2023
  6. Laura Barron-Lopez and Matt Loffman, GOP presidential candidates appear at far-right Moms for Liberty event, PBS News Hour, June 30, 2023
  7. Andrew Atterbury, DeSantis names Moms for Liberty co-founder to Florida ethics panel, Politico, Sept. 6, 2023
  8. Paul Steinhauser, Moms for Liberty takes center stage again in 2024 Republican presidential race, Fox News, Sept. 6, 2023
  9. US Republican candidates woo controversial Moms for Liberty group, Al Jazeera, June 29, 2023
  10. Juan Perez, Jr., The parents group Republicans are banking on to win the White House, Politico, June 30, 2023
  11. Gregory Krieg, How `Moms for Liberty’ grew into a 2024 Republican power player, CNN Politics, June 30, 2023
  12. Ali Swenson, Moms for Liberty rises as power player in GOP politics after attacking schools over gender, race, Associated Press, June 11, 2023
  13. Francesca Block, Gov. Kim Reynolds pushed `parental rights’ to Moms for Liberty crows. Protesters pushed back, Des Moines Register, Feb. 3, 2023
  14. Republican presidential candidates canoodle with Moms for Liberty, The Economist, July 6, 2023
  15. Reuters, From schools to statehouses, conservative Moms for Liberty push to grow influence, NBC News, April 6, 2022
  16. Tyler Kingkade, Moms for Liberty’s conservative activists are planning their next move: Taking over school boards, NBC News, July 17, 2022
  17. Wikipedia, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, https://www.en.m.wikipedia.org
  18. Goldwater Institute, https://www.goldwaterinstitute.org
  19. Moms for Liberty, https://www.momsforliberty.org
  20. Parents Defending Education, https://www.defendinged.org No Left Turn in Education, https://www.noleftturn.us
  21. Gays Against Groomers, https://www.gaysagainstgroomers.com

Disclosure: Steve is a non-paid freelance opinion editor and guest columnist contributor (circa 2013) to 172 newspapers in 32 states who receives no remuneration, funding or endorsement from any for-profit business, not-for-profit organization, political action committee or political party.


Read More

Veterans Don’t Stop Being Veterans at the Prison Gate

Veterans often lose VA healthcare, disability benefits, and education access during incarceration, disrupting PTSD and addiction treatment when continuity matters most.

Getty Images

Veterans Don’t Stop Being Veterans at the Prison Gate

A veteran’s PTSD doesn’t disappear when they enter prison. Traumatic brain injuries don’t cure themselves. Addiction doesn't vanish behind bars. Yet many of the systems designed to help veterans manage those conditions stop at the prison gate.

When veterans are incarcerated, they often lose access to VA healthcare, struggle to use education benefits, and face major cuts to disability compensation. The problem is not eligibility. The problem is continuity.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why I’m Using My Influence to Defend Democracy Now

A group of people waving small American flags at sunset.

Getty stock photo

Why I’m Using My Influence to Defend Democracy Now

It was about this time of year in 1997 that I moved across the country and took my first job in the sector broadly known as “civil society.”

Since then, I have grown in my career. I have developed a profile. By dint of sheer survival and longevity, I have accumulated seniority.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs outside of the Idaho statehouse.

Protesters rally for abortion rights outside of the Idaho Statehouse in downtown Boise, Idaho, on May 14, 2022.

Sarah A. Miller/Idaho Statesman/AP

Idaho Voters Will Weigh In on One of the Strictest Abortion Bans in the Country

Idaho voters will weigh in on their state’s abortion laws this November. The secretary of state’s office certified a ballot measure that could, if passed, overturn one of the strictest bans in the country, the campaign to restore abortion rights in Idaho confirmed on Monday.

The measure would enact a new law establishing a state right to “reproductive freedom,” which it defines as allowing residents to make their own decisions in areas including fertility treatment, contraception and abortion. But it would not amend the state’s constitution, meaning it could still be overturned by the state’s Republican legislature. Currently, Idaho bans abortion in nearly all circumstances, with a narrow exception if staying pregnant threatens someone’s life.

Keep ReadingShow less
The New Fight Over Election Observation
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

The New Fight Over Election Observation

As a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the U.S. has signed the foundational agreement committing all participating states to open elections to external scrutiny and inviting fellow members to observe through the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). The 2024 ODIHR observation mission to the U.S. found the fundamentals reassuring—a well-run process, active engagement, free campaigning—but issued 31 recommendations to align U.S. elections with international standards and commitments. Four stand out: federal pre-clearance legislation against discriminatory election-law changes; reassessing the Electoral College; balanced representation in election administration; and guaranteed access for international and nonpartisan observers—notable, since 17 states still legally bar international observation, which is at odds with commitments made by all 57 OSCE states. Yet over a year later, follow-through is thin: no pre-clearance restoration, no Electoral College review, unchanged observer-access laws. Where movement exists—in disinformation tools, in financial disclosure—it remains piecemeal.

An uncomfortable convergence

Keep ReadingShow less