Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

A Contemporary Olive Branch Petition

Opinion

Voter receives a pen from poll worker at polling station.

A civic petition calling for constitutional restraint, civil discourse, bipartisan cooperation, and equal justice to strengthen American democracy and national unity.

SDI Productions/Getty Images

To the President of the United States, the Leaders of the Congress, and Our Fellow Americans Entrusted with the Powers of Government:

When, in the ordinary course of a free republic, disagreements arise among citizens concerning the proper exercise of power, it is neither unusual nor dishonorable that earnest convictions should differ. Such diversity has long been the strength of our nation, for liberty has never depended upon unanimity of opinion, but upon mutual respect under a common Constitution.


We write not as adversaries seeking triumph over our countrymen, but as fellow Americans who remain devoted to the enduring promise that this Republic belongs equally to all its people. We acknowledge that elections carry consequences, that the people have entrusted the present government with lawful authority, and that those who serve in office possess both the right and the responsibility to govern.

We also acknowledge our own imperfections. Those whose views are commonly described as Democratic, liberal, or progressive have not always listened with sufficient care to the concerns of those who differ from us. At times we have mistaken disagreement for malice, spoken with unnecessary contempt, or failed to appreciate the anxieties that have shaped the convictions of millions of our fellow citizens. We do not claim exclusive possession of wisdom, patriotism, or virtue.

Yet humility compels us equally to speak with candor.

Many among us fear that the extraordinary powers of government are now employed in ways that deepen division rather than heal it; that institutions intended to preserve equal justice are increasingly regarded as instruments of partisan advantage; that the rights, dignity, and security of political minorities may become dependent upon the favor of those who temporarily hold power rather than upon enduring constitutional principles.

We do not question the patriotism of those with whom we disagree. We recognize that many who support the present administration do so from sincere convictions regarding economic opportunity, national security, the rule of law, religious liberty, and the proper limits of government. We neither deny these concerns nor ask that they be abandoned.

We ask only that our own concerns receive equal regard.

We seek assurances that disagreement shall never be treated as disloyalty; that criticism of government shall remain the protected inheritance of every citizen; that no American shall fear retaliation for peaceful speech, lawful protest, independent journalism, academic inquiry, or participation in elections. We ask that the machinery of government be administered impartially, without preference for political friends or punishment of political opponents.

We further entreat that debates concerning immigration, public safety, taxation, health care, education, energy, foreign affairs, and the many difficult questions before the nation proceed not through the language of contempt, but through reasoned deliberation worthy of a constitutional republic. Let victories at the ballot box not become licenses for humiliation, nor electoral defeats occasions for despair.

History reminds us that the greatest dangers to free governments seldom arise from disagreement itself, but from the belief that one's opponents are enemies beyond redemption. Such a belief, once accepted, dissolves the bonds of citizenship and transforms neighbors into rivals for domination rather than partners in self-government.

Our Republic has endured civil war, economic calamity, acts of terror, and profound social transformation because generations before us understood that constitutional government requires restraint as well as strength. Those entrusted with power preserve their greatest honor not merely by exercising authority, but by exercising it with moderation toward those who opposed them.

We therefore respectfully petition that opportunities be sought for genuine bipartisan consultation upon matters affecting the long-term health of the nation; that public servants refrain from language that inflames hostility between Americans; that independent institutions be protected from improper political interference; and that every citizen, regardless of party, race, religion, region, or belief, be recognized as possessing equal claim to the blessings and protections of our Constitution.

We make these requests not because we seek advantage over our fellow citizens, nor because we desire to obstruct the lawful work of government, but because we believe that reconciliation is both possible and necessary. We would rather leave to our children a nation strengthened by mutual confidence than one exhausted by perpetual political warfare.

Should our appeals be received in the generous spirit in which they are offered, we stand ready to participate in sincere dialogue, to acknowledge legitimate differences, to compromise where conscience permits, and to defend together those constitutional principles that belong to neither party alone.

May those entrusted with authority remember that power is temporary, but the Republic endures. May those in opposition remember that criticism bears greater force when joined with humility. And may all Americans, whatever their political persuasion, preserve for future generations a Union in which liberty is secured not by the victory of one faction over another, but by the faithful observance of justice, restraint, and the equal dignity of every citizen.

With respect for our common country, and with hope that reconciliation may yet prevail, we submit this Petition in a spirit of peace.

Concerned Citizens of the United States of America.


Beau Breslin is the Joseph C. Palamountain Jr. Chair in Government at Skidmore College.


Read More

How an 1876 Massacre of Black Men in South Carolina Turned Racial Terror Into Political Power

This statue on the grounds of the South Carolina State House honors violent segregationist Ben Tillman, who also served as governor and U.S. senator.

How an 1876 Massacre of Black Men in South Carolina Turned Racial Terror Into Political Power

As the U.S. celebrates its 250th anniversary, its citizens commemorate a democracy more diverse, free and inclusive than it’s ever been. The path to this milestone was imperfect and paved in blood and suffering. Still, few of the revelers will likely pay heed to the anniversary of another historic event: the 150th anniversary of the July 1876 Hamburg massacre.

The massacre, which took place in Hamburg, South Carolina, began as a dispute between a local Black militia and two white citizens over whether the latter could cross the group’s centennial Fourth of July parade. The militia leader, Doc Adams, was later charged with blocking a public highway.

Keep ReadingShow less
A crowd of supporters holding signs behind Senate candidate Dr. Abdul El-Sayed as he stands and speaks at a podium outside in front of a crowd.

The crowd cheers as Senate candidate Dr. Abdul El-Sayed speaks during the "People vs. the Powerful" rally in Lansing, Michigan, on July 19, 2026.

Rosem Morton for The 19th

Who Is Electable? Michigan’s Senate Primary Asks a Familiar Question.

DETROIT — Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, a top Black House Democrat, was making the case for a moderate politician running on boosting jobs and manufacturing. Six years ago, it was to crowds in his home state, arguing that Joe Biden was the best positioned to win in a general election. This time, it was on a stage in Detroit, for a candidate in one of 2026’s most hotly contested Senate primaries.

“I know what it takes to energize Democratic voters. I know she has what it takes to energize Democratic voters, and we need that,” Clyburn said alongside Rep. Haley Stevens, a candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan, at a Teamsters hall in Detroit on Friday before the two rallied alongside Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

Keep ReadingShow less
Peace and Friendship Handshake During Mass in St Mary's Roman Catholic Church

Christian nationalism is shaping US policy and politics. Religious leaders and citizens can challenge extremism and rebuild democracy through peace, dialogue, and inclusion.

P Deliss/Getty Images

Calling all Peacemakers and Children of God

The official recruitment practices haven’t changed, but more than a year after the US State Department’s excavation, a new contract with Military Hire, a subsidiary of RedBalloon, aims to recruit candidates ideologically aligned with the current administration, including Christians. Not an isolated incident, this was just one example illustrating how a particular Christian nationalist ideology has been seeping into domestic and foreign policy. We should hear the clarion call warning of the dangers of extremism. But it should also invite us to a deeper understanding of one another and a reimagining of our democracy.

Journalists have described Secretary of War Hegseth’s membership in the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC), his invitations to clergy from this denomination to preach at the Pentagon, and proclamations of God’s will as he wages war against Iran. This ideology elevates the concept of our nation based on an extreme, narrow Christian identity.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of a Black woman's hands receiving a mail-in ballot to vote in a USA Presidential, Senatorial, Congressional, or local election

Federal investigators spent eight months reviewing the Allied Pilots Association election, examining ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and transparency before allowing the results to stand.

Jeremy Poland/Getty Images

What a Federal Investigation of a Union Election Can Teach Us About Democratic Trust

For eight months, federal investigators examined allegations involving ballot secrecy, observer rights, election records and reporting procedures in a contested union election before allowing the result to stand.

Following a disputed election within the Allied Pilots Association (APA), complaints led to a formal review by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Labor-Management Standards. Investigators spent months going through election records, audit logs, witness testimony and technical documentation before reaching their conclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less