Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

It's time for a campaign to turn the tide of political violence

People watching a TV

People watch news coverage of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.

Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Image

Merloe is a member of the Election Reformers Network Advisory Council and provides strategic advice on democracy and elections in the U.S. and internationally.

The United States is not alone in suffering political violence — nor is the despicable attempted assassination of Donald Trump the sole such incident in modern American history. The outpouring of prayers and calls to tone down rhetoric are laudable, but they are not enough to change the current political dynamics. Succumbing to a sense of futility and disengaging from politics will only make things worse.

We need something big, loud, positive and continuous to break through political negativity. The rising tide in support of political violence must be confronted by a strong public outcry against it.


Civic, religious, sports, entertainment, business and political leaders must step up. It is time for an all-out campaign for peaceful politics in America. Concerts for peaceful politics (national, like Live Aid, and local) and support by superstars of all sports and entertainment genres and by business leaders — individually and jointly — are required, as are inter-religious messaging for peaceful politics. Which companies will include peaceful politics in their ads? Who will do TikTok posts for it? And dare we imagine even the sports internet and the Zynternet embracing peaceful politics?

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

And, every one of us has the responsibility to engage in such messaging in our personal and digital worlds, including editorial board members, media personalities and influencers.

Such efforts positively affected countries in Africa, the Balkans and Latin America where political violence took horrific tolls and/or was threatening peaceful democratic political processes. Building pressure for peace adds incentives for parties and candidates to moderate and call on their supporters to eschew violence.

Candidate and political party anti-violence pledges are often a focus of attention. They are most effective when included in a broader public campaign to mobilize demand for peaceful politics. Voluntary anti-violence pledges can be particularly effectual where: the pledge is sponsored by an authoritative convening body or coalition that the political antagonists find difficult to refuse; the pledge requires the candidates to make regular public calls for supporters to eschew violence; supporter training repeats the pledge; and the accord includes a monitoring body to call for accountability should political violence occur.

Ghana’s current anti-political violence initiative is led by the highly influential National Peace Council. It includes a party code of conduct against vigilantism and electoral violence, with a commission to address violations of the pledge. The NPC and others are conducting a “national peace crusade” for the December 2024 elections. Such peace campaigns played important roles in mitigating political violence in Ghana’s past elections They provide just one positive country example.

There are current examples to draw upon in this country as well, including legislative enactments such as Utah’s voluntary “pledge of fair campaign practices.” Plus, there are calls like the multi-organization effort around the Candidate Principles for Trusted Elections, co-led by The Carter Center and the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation with complementary efforts by others, such as Team Democracy, which includes former U.S. military leaders. Such initiatives rightfully embrace anti-violence principles as part of broader election campaign ethics, because peaceful politics requires more than renouncing violence.

Peaceful politics extends beyond elections. It is part of a country’s political culture, which in America is trending toward greater anticipation and even acceptance of political violence. Studies show approximately 20 percent of the population see it as acceptable and approximately 60 percent do if the other party commits political violence first, which is up 20 percent from four years ago. Confronting and curtailing that tide requires demanding a shift in culture with action on numerous fronts.

A vigorous campaign for peaceful politics in America over the next several months can avert the damage to democracy and the decades of repair that politics by violence brings. It can also provide an antidote to political negativity. We will need to project its message in various forms to detoxify our political environment in the longer run.

Read More

Suzette Brooks Masters
Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

‘Democracy is something we have to fight for’: A conversation with Suzette Brooks Masters

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City, and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the seventh in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

Is polarization in the United States laying the groundwork for political violence? That is not a simple question to answer.

Affective polarization — the tendency of partisans to hate those who hold opposing political views — does seem to be growing in the United States. But as a recent report from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace makes clear, “many European countries show affective polarization at about the same level as that of the United States, but their democracies are not suffering as much, suggesting that something about the US political system, media, campaigns, or social fabric is allowing Americans’ level of emotional polarization to be particularly harmful to US democracy.”

Suzette Brooks Masters is someone whose job it is to think about threats to American democracy. The leader of the Better Futures Project at the Democracy Funders Network, Masters recently spent months studying innovations in resilient democracy from around the world. The resulting report, “Imagining Better Futures for American Democracy,” argues that one way to help protect American democracy from “authoritarian disruption” is to engage in a process of “reimagining our governance model for the future.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less
US Capitol surrounded by digital code

Some members of Congress use social media to disparage the system they’re part of.

traffic_analyzer/Getty Images

Members of Congress undermine the country – and their own legitimacy – with antidemocratic rhetoric

Miller is a visiting assistant professor of political science at the University of Richmond.

Blame was cast far and wide after the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump. Obviously, the shooter was to blame, but depending on your perspective, you also blamed Democrats, Republicans or both for the highly charged partisan rhetoric that has heated up American political life and, for at least some people, made violence seem like an option.

While the event was shocking, the underlying mood has been building for quite a while. The political times Americans are living through are increasingly described as a “crisis of democracy.” Much has been written about growing polarization, reduced public trust in small-d democratic institutions and long-standing principles of behavior often thought of as “democratic norms,” and increasing levels of public support for autocratic ideas and leaders.

Keep ReadingShow less
Joe Biden leaving Marine One
Kent Nishimura/Getty Images

Is replacing Biden as his party’s nominee an attack on democracy? Hardly.

Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.

Alas, the coronation of Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee is complete.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump at a podium

Former PresidentDonald Trump walks on stage at the New Holland Arena during a campaign event in Harrisburg, Pa., on July 31.

Tom Brenner for The Washington Post via Getty Images

Can’t we get back to solving problems?

Radwell is the author of “American Schism: How the Two Enlightenments Hold the Secret to Healing our Nation” and serves on the Business Council at Business for America. This is the 11th entry in what was intended to be a 10-part series on the American schism in 2024.

We are once again in the thick of a presidential election cycle at risk of being dominated by spectacle and far too light on substance. As in 2016 and 2020, sensationalist developments — most recently an attempted assassination of one candidate and the bowing out of another — have transfixed the media 24/7.

While these recent events were arguably worthy of the attention they received, too often even fairly mundane developments such as Donald Trump’s rants and Joe Biden’s gaffes seem to become a media obsession. Such coverage distracts us from the pressing consequential issues facing our country and indeed the world.

Keep ReadingShow less